H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 04:30 UTC
Petra Martic vs Julia Goerges H2H: 0-3
Julia Goerges holds a 3–0 lead over Petra Martic in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Julia Goerges leads 2–0 on hard courts and 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Julia Goerges won the 2020 Australian Open second round 4-6 6-3 7-5.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CRO
Age 35
Right-Handed
181 cm / 5'11"
H2H
0
–
3
3 main draw meetings
GER
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 23, 2020* | Australian Open | Grand Slam | R64 | Hard | Julia Goerges | 4-6 6-3 7-5 | Petra Martic | Match data |
| Jun 22, 2019* | Birmingham | WTA 250 | SF | Grass | Julia Goerges | 6-4 6-3 | Petra Martic | Match data |
| Jul 26, 2008* | Portoroz | WTA 250 | QF | Hard | Julia Goerges | 6-3 4-6 6-4 | Petra Martic | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Petra Martic | #349 | #14 | 2,850 | 1,942 | 212 | 214 | 49.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Julia Goerges | #45 | #9 | 3,980 | 1,940 | 304 | 249 | 55.0% | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 4 | 7 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Petra Martic | Julia Goerges | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 2007 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #330 | 1,480 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 4–5 | 44.4% | #126 | 1,543 | 0 | 0 |
| 2008 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #215 | 1,506 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 6–7 | 46.2% | #108 | 1,557 | 0 | 0 |
| 2009 | 6–7 | 46.2% | #82 | 1,538 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 9–11 | 45.0% | #77 | 1,588 | 0 | 0 |
| 2010 | 5–14 | 26.3% | #142 | 1,512 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 29–22 | 56.9% | #40 | 1,760 | 0 | 1 |
| 2011 | 16–14 | 53.3% | #50 | 1,613 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 36–24 | 60.0% | #21 | 1,772 | 0 | 2 |
| 2012 | 18–18 | 50.0% | #59 | 1,690 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 34–25 | 57.6% | #18 | 1,751 | 0 | 2 |
| 2013 | 7–12 | 36.8% | #107 | 1,606 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 14–27 | 34.1% | #72 | 1,535 | 0 | 2 |
| 2014 | 1–8 | 11.1% | #186 | 1,515 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 15–18 | 45.5% | #74 | 1,596 | 0 | 2 |
| 2015 | 0–8 | 0.0% | #148 | 1,435 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 17–20 | 45.9% | #50 | 1,612 | 0 | 2 |
| 2016 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #262 | 1,525 | 0 | 0 | 2016 | 22–20 | 52.4% | #53 | 1,671 | 0 | 2 |
| 2017 | 6–4 | 60.0% | #89 | 1,612 | 0 | 0 | 2017 | 42–22 | 65.6% | #14 | 1,880 | 0 | 4 |
| 2018 | 26–17 | 60.5% | #32 | 1,795 | 0 | 0 | 2018 | 44–22 | 66.7% | #14 | 1,861 | 0 | 6 |
| 2019 | 36–17 | 67.9% | #15 | 1,903 | 0 | 1 | 2019 | 26–20 | 56.5% | #28 | 1,799 | 0 | 7 |
| 2020 | 14–11 | 56.0% | #18 | 1,805 | 0 | 1 | 2020 | 6–6 | 50.0% | #45 | 1,761 | 0 | 7 |
| 2021 | 15–21 | 41.7% | #54 | 1,658 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2022 | 25–17 | 59.5% | #38 | 1,794 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2023 | 20–19 | 51.3% | #40 | 1,808 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2024 | 9–18 | 33.3% | #122 | 1,649 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2025 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #209 | 1,611 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |