H2H data updated: 2026-09-13 00:00 UTC

Petra Martic vs Misaki Doi H2H: 1-2

Misaki Doi holds a 2–1 lead over Petra Martic in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Misaki Doi leads 2–0 on hard courts, while Petra Martic leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Misaki Doi won the 2023 Pan Pacific Open first round 7-5 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Petra Martic
Croatia Age 35 Right-Handed 181 cm / 5'11"
H2H
1 – 2
3 main-draw meetings
Misaki Doi
Japan Age 35 Left-Handed 159 cm / 5'3"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Misaki Doi #331 7-5 6-2 Petra Martic #49 Match data Sep 28, 2023* R32 Pan Pacific Open WTA 500 Hard
Petra Martic #17 7-6(2) 7-5 Misaki Doi #81 Match data Sep 29, 2020* R128 Roland Garros Grand Slam Clay
Misaki Doi #92 6-3 6-4 Petra Martic #62 Match data Jan 16, 2013* R128 Australian Open Grand Slam Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Petra Martic #349 #14 2,850 1,938 212 215 49.6% 0 0 0 0 2 2
Misaki Doi #258 #30 1,555 1,734 99 167 37.2% 0 0 0 0 1 1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Petra Martic Misaki Doi
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 2007 0–1 0.0% #330 1,480 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 2008 2–1 66.7% #215 1,505 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 2009 6–7 46.2% #82 1,538 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 2010 5–14 26.3% #142 1,516 0 0 2010 0–3 0.0% #132 1,475 0 0
20 2011 16–14 53.3% #50 1,621 0 0 2011 6–11 35.3% #120 1,492 0 0
21 2012 18–18 50.0% #59 1,691 0 0 2012 10–9 52.6% #93 1,552 0 0
22 2013 7–12 36.8% #107 1,607 0 0 2013 9–15 37.5% #90 1,569 0 0
23 2014 1–8 11.1% #186 1,515 0 0 2014 5–10 33.3% #124 1,553 0 0
24 2015 0–8 0.0% #148 1,435 0 0 2015 13–14 48.1% #54 1,657 0 1
25 2016 3–3 50.0% #262 1,525 0 0 2016 20–27 42.6% #40 1,668 0 1
26 2017 6–4 60.0% #89 1,613 0 0 2017 9–17 34.6% #122 1,530 0 1
27 2018 26–17 60.5% #32 1,798 0 0 2018 1–3 25.0% #128 1,571 0 1
28 2019 36–17 67.9% #15 1,901 0 1 2019 8–14 36.4% #82 1,644 0 1
29 2020 14–11 56.0% #18 1,804 0 1 2020 1–8 11.1% #83 1,572 0 1
30 2021 15–21 41.7% #54 1,656 0 1 2021 11–21 34.4% #105 1,588 0 1
31 2022 25–17 59.5% #38 1,796 0 2 2022 5–13 27.8% #173 1,457 0 1
32 2023 20–19 51.3% #40 1,806 0 2 2023 1–2 33.3% #258 1,488 0 1
33 2024 9–19 32.1% #122 1,635 0 2 — — — — — — —
34 2025 3–4 42.9% #209 1,606 0 2 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Petra Martic Misaki Doi
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
16 2007 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 2008 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 2009 3 4 7 42.9% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2010 3 7 10 30.0% 0 5 5 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 2010 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
20 2011 11 9 20 55.0% 4 4 8 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 2011 3 8 11 27.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — —
21 2012 12 12 24 50.0% 5 4 9 55.6% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 2012 7 7 14 50.0% — — — — 3 2 5 60.0% — — — —
22 2013 1 6 7 14.3% 4 5 9 44.4% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — 2013 7 10 17 41.2% 2 4 6 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
23 2014 1 5 6 16.7% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2014 4 8 12 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
24 2015 0 4 4 0.0% 0 4 4 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2015 9 9 18 50.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
25 2016 0 1 1 0.0% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — — — — — 2016 11 19 30 36.7% 4 5 9 44.4% 5 3 8 62.5% — — — —
26 2017 0 2 2 0.0% 3 1 4 75.0% 3 1 4 75.0% — — — — 2017 4 10 14 28.6% 5 6 11 45.5% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
27 2018 18 10 28 64.3% 7 5 12 58.3% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 2018 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 2019 14 12 26 53.8% 16 3 19 84.2% 6 2 8 75.0% — — — — 2019 8 12 20 40.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — —
29 2020 8 7 15 53.3% 6 4 10 60.0% — — — — — — — — 2020 0 5 5 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — —
30 2021 7 13 20 35.0% 6 5 11 54.5% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — 2021 9 12 21 42.9% 1 6 7 14.3% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — —
31 2022 11 9 20 55.0% 11 5 16 68.8% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — 2022 4 7 11 36.4% 1 4 5 20.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
32 2023 12 13 25 48.0% 4 4 8 50.0% 4 2 6 66.7% — — — — 2023 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2024 5 11 16 31.3% 3 6 9 33.3% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2025 1 2 3 33.3% 2 1 3 66.7% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 109 129 238 45.8% 77 63 140 55.0% 24 21 45 53.3% 2 2 4 50.0% — 68 113 181 37.6% 17 36 53 32.1% 14 18 32 43.8% — — — —

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 406/427 of Petra Martic's and 241/267 of Misaki Doi's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Petra Martic Misaki Doi
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
16 2007 1/1 4.0 3.0 51.0% 75.5% 55.3% 50.0% 33.3% 65.6% 38.4% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
17 2008 2/3 3.0 5.5 66.8% 69.2% 33.8% 56.3% 66.7% 57.6% 48.6% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
18 2009 12/13 2.0 3.0 60.5% 63.9% 45.2% 60.5% 50.2% 57.0% 40.2% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
19 2010 18/19 2.4 4.3 62.9% 60.8% 45.8% 55.5% 38.6% 55.0% 37.5% 2010 3/3 0.0 2.0 68.2% 56.7% 42.6% 55.7% 13.9% 52.3% 34.8%
20 2011 27/30 3.8 5.3 56.2% 64.5% 47.1% 50.8% 38.7% 56.7% 41.6% 2011 15/17 1.1 3.4 62.4% 60.0% 40.7% 49.6% 40.7% 52.3% 41.7%
21 2012 35/36 4.6 4.3 57.8% 65.0% 45.4% 53.3% 48.4% 56.5% 40.2% 2012 19/19 1.7 3.0 62.4% 62.6% 48.8% 48.0% 42.8% 57.5% 45.5%
22 2013 16/19 4.2 5.4 60.1% 62.7% 45.0% 52.2% 33.9% 55.5% 40.1% 2013 20/24 1.3 3.2 59.3% 61.4% 48.6% 41.7% 39.2% 56.2% 42.1%
23 2014 7/9 3.7 4.0 53.2% 61.9% 39.2% 50.3% 47.2% 51.5% 35.3% 2014 15/15 1.7 2.7 60.4% 62.4% 40.8% 53.7% 46.0% 53.5% 41.4%
24 2015 6/8 4.2 5.3 56.0% 64.0% 40.8% 47.3% 50.6% 54.3% 30.8% 2015 18/27 2.4 2.5 62.7% 61.7% 46.2% 51.4% 59.2% 56.2% 42.3%
25 2016 6/6 4.0 4.7 66.0% 62.8% 47.5% 57.2% 40.4% 57.6% 39.3% 2016 42/47 1.9 2.2 59.9% 61.9% 47.1% 57.8% 41.6% 56.1% 39.3%
26 2017 10/10 3.4 2.7 68.9% 66.1% 50.3% 55.1% 51.5% 61.0% 45.4% 2017 24/26 1.1 1.9 62.7% 59.0% 46.8% 46.7% 40.3% 54.1% 40.0%
27 2018 43/43 3.2 2.2 62.8% 66.7% 48.8% 56.4% 43.9% 60.2% 42.8% 2018 4/4 0.8 2.3 63.7% 59.6% 42.9% 57.1% 52.2% 53.6% 42.4%
28 2019 52/53 2.6 2.7 64.0% 66.8% 49.8% 59.9% 49.1% 60.7% 44.2% 2019 22/22 0.9 3.1 59.9% 60.8% 46.1% 50.0% 54.7% 54.8% 40.3%
29 2020 25/25 3.2 2.6 61.7% 65.2% 50.7% 64.0% 39.1% 59.6% 41.7% 2020 9/9 0.7 4.1 63.4% 58.5% 41.4% 54.0% 41.3% 51.8% 39.5%
30 2021 36/36 3.8 2.8 58.8% 66.3% 46.7% 51.1% 43.6% 58.1% 39.1% 2021 29/33 0.9 2.7 61.8% 58.0% 45.0% 44.7% 51.9% 53.2% 39.3%
31 2022 42/42 4.5 3.3 60.1% 67.7% 49.2% 48.0% 43.3% 60.1% 40.9% 2022 18/18 1.2 3.6 60.4% 60.0% 39.4% 56.5% 46.6% 52.0% 37.7%
32 2023 38/39 4.8 3.4 57.1% 68.6% 47.9% 56.2% 40.1% 60.0% 39.8% 2023 3/3 2.0 1.7 68.4% 64.7% 49.6% 56.6% 34.7% 60.3% 35.7%
33 2024 27/28 4.4 3.5 58.8% 67.3% 42.8% 47.6% 49.7% 57.1% 37.9% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
34 2025 3/7 1.7 3.7 62.1% 57.5% 38.4% 45.6% 35.6% 50.5% 41.2% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 406/427 3.7 3.4 60.3% 65.9% 47.2% 54.3% 44.1% 58.4% 40.8% — 241/267 1.4 2.8 61.4% 60.6% 45.2% 50.8% 45.4% 54.6% 40.5%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Petra Martic Misaki Doi
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 2007 1480 97.4 -1.36 -1.85 1.117 51.0% — — — 33.3% -0.33 0–1 0–1 — +0.22 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 2008 1506 104.8 -0.42 +0.18 1.145 53.2% +19 — — 62.5% +0.63 1–1 1–0 — +0.27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 2009 1539 112.1 +0.24 -2.39 0.933 48.5% +1 +22 — 50.0% -0.21 0–2 2–1 (67%) — +0.36 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2010 1517 116.5 -0.78 -3.50 0.832 46.5% +35 -37 — 31.8% -1.23 4–4 (50%) 4–4 (50%) 102.7 -0.85 2010 1475 100.7 -0.02 -0.90 0.729 43.5% — — — 14.3% -2.71 0–1 — — -0.27
20 2011 1622 125.1 +0.45 -1.86 0.961 48.9% +17 -104 — 51.4% +0.07 10–4 (71%) 4–0 (100%) 111.1 +0.97 2011 1492 110.6 -2.09 -1.38 0.872 46.9% +9 — +124 35.3% -0.85 2–0 0–3 (0%) — +0.29
21 2012 1692 131.0 +0.67 -2.20 0.926 48.6% -8 -98 — 48.8% -0.17 8–4 (67%) 3–6 (33%) 104.8 -1.21 2012 1552 111.2 +0.40 -0.63 1.068 51.3% -14 — +104 48.9% +0.38 5–2 (71%) 0–3 (0%) 102.4 +1.74
22 2013 1607 115.3 -1.25 -2.67 0.900 48.0% -10 -6 +18 41.9% -0.47 3–4 (43%) 2–3 (40%) 99.1 -0.05 2013 1570 117.8 -0.57 -1.00 0.962 48.8% +1 -75 — 41.8% -0.62 2–5 (29%) 2–2 (50%) 96.5 -0.40
23 2014 1516 93.7 -1.25 -4.62 0.729 43.8% +28 — — 17.6% -2.53 0–1 1–1 — +0.24 2014 1553 112.0 -1.33 -1.10 0.890 47.5% -8 — — 35.3% -1.15 2–4 (33%) 2–1 (67%) 99.7 -0.48
24 2015 1435 105.3 -1.11 -3.28 0.673 43.0% +70 +50 — 0.0% -3.06 — — — -0.11 2015 1658 123.9 -1.42 +0.28 0.967 49.9% -22 -122 -54 48.4% -0.26 4–6 (40%) 4–3 (57%) 101.8 -0.92
25 2016 1525 114.6 -0.08 -2.76 0.925 48.4% — +9 — 46.7% -0.53 2–1 (67%) 1–0 — -0.05 2016 1669 124.6 +0.05 -2.56 0.894 47.9% -39 -94 0 42.7% -0.70 5–8 (38%) 6–3 (67%) 101.2 -0.95
26 2017 1613 126.9 +3.55 +1.52 1.162 53.0% — +3 +54 60.0% +0.96 2–3 (40%) 1–2 (33%) — +0.03 2017 1531 112.4 -1.70 -2.51 0.872 47.2% -31 +75 — 32.1% -1.02 4–3 (57%) 1–4 (20%) 99.5 +0.29
27 2018 1798 139.6 +3.00 +0.36 1.076 51.1% -18 -100 -125 58.3% +0.55 8–4 (67%) 6–4 (60%) 106.6 -0.04 2018 1571 111.0 -0.62 -0.93 0.914 48.6% +3 — — 36.4% -0.27 1–2 (33%) 1–1 — -0.14
28 2019 1901 146.2 +3.96 +1.65 1.124 52.4% -93 +30 -139 58.5% +0.79 15–3 (83%) 4–6 (40%) 110.1 -0.27 2019 1645 124.7 -1.10 -1.27 0.892 47.9% -30 — — 40.4% -0.65 3–5 (38%) 2–4 (33%) 97.6 +0.04
29 2020 1805 132.1 +1.70 -1.09 1.032 50.6% -35 +79 — 56.7% +0.28 4–6 (40%) 7–3 (70%) 98.0 +1.15 2020 1573 110.0 -2.38 -1.23 0.819 45.8% -9 +73 — 29.2% -1.38 1–5 (17%) 0–3 (0%) — +0.58
30 2021 1657 123.5 +1.00 -2.75 0.932 48.5% -33 +198 +99 43.7% -0.22 7–8 (47%) 4–8 (33%) 94.0 +2.13 2021 1589 123.1 -2.40 -2.77 0.841 46.3% -9 -27 +70 35.3% -1.09 4–4 (50%) 2–1 (67%) 102.6 -0.58
31 2022 1796 134.2 +2.70 -0.72 1.026 50.4% -88 +143 -60 56.3% +0.31 8–4 (67%) 10–5 (67%) 107.9 +0.20 2022 1458 108.2 -3.32 -3.02 0.784 45.3% +75 -2 — 29.3% -1.46 3–2 (60%) 3–0 (100%) — +1.02
32 2023 1807 141.5 +3.00 -1.92 0.994 49.7% -62 +90 +3 47.1% -0.20 8–5 (62%) 5–6 (45%) 103.2 -0.59 2023 1489 114.0 -0.38 -0.81 0.899 47.3% +67 — — 42.9% -0.86 0–1 — — +0.08
33 2024 1636 121.5 +0.25 -3.87 0.883 47.5% -6 +131 +180 35.4% -0.94 4–5 (44%) 3–3 (50%) 97.0 +0.09 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2025 1607 111.0 -0.30 -0.75 0.832 45.5% -40 +116 — 47.4% -0.53 2–3 (40%) 0–1 — +0.57 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1938 136.0 +1.65 -1.36 0.980 49.5% -28 +38 -14 48.7% -0.08 86–63 (58%) 58–54 (52%) 109.3 +0.72 — 1734 122.8 -1.24 -1.72 0.894 47.7% -11 -23 +50 38.9% -0.77 36–48 (43%) 23–28 (45%) 98.3 +0.11

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.