H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 22:32 UTC
Petra Martic vs Yafan Wang H2H: 1-1
Petra Martic and Yafan Wang are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Petra Martic leads 1–0 on clay, while Yafan Wang leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Petra Martic won the 2018 Roland Garros first round 6-2 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CRO
Age 35
Right-Handed
181 cm / 5'11"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
CHN
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 29, 2018* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R128 | Clay | Petra Martic | 6-2 6-3 | Yafan Wang | Match data |
| Sep 19, 2014* | Guangzhou | WTA 250 | R16 | Hard | Yafan Wang | 7-6(5) 6-3 | Petra Martic | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Petra Martic | #349 | #14 | 2,850 | 1,942 | 212 | 214 | 49.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Yafan Wang | #358 | #47 | 1,185 | 1,784 | 71 | 89 | 44.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Petra Martic | Yafan Wang | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 2007 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #330 | 1,480 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 3–1 | 75.0% | #180 | 1,549 | 0 | 0 |
| 2008 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #215 | 1,506 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #136 | 1,546 | 0 | 0 |
| 2009 | 6–7 | 46.2% | #82 | 1,538 | 0 | 0 | 2016 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #116 | 1,535 | 0 | 0 |
| 2010 | 5–14 | 26.3% | #142 | 1,512 | 0 | 0 | 2017 | 5–5 | 50.0% | #170 | 1,544 | 0 | 0 |
| 2011 | 16–14 | 53.3% | #50 | 1,613 | 0 | 0 | 2018 | 11–12 | 47.8% | #70 | 1,617 | 0 | 0 |
| 2012 | 18–18 | 50.0% | #59 | 1,690 | 0 | 0 | 2019 | 24–21 | 53.3% | #48 | 1,718 | 0 | 1 |
| 2013 | 7–12 | 36.8% | #107 | 1,606 | 0 | 0 | 2020 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #95 | 1,664 | 0 | 1 |
| 2014 | 1–8 | 11.1% | #186 | 1,515 | 0 | 0 | 2021 | 1–9 | 10.0% | #309 | 1,495 | 0 | 1 |
| 2015 | 0–8 | 0.0% | #148 | 1,435 | 0 | 0 | 2023 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #100 | 1,627 | 0 | 1 |
| 2016 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #262 | 1,525 | 0 | 0 | 2024 | 15–16 | 48.4% | #61 | 1,719 | 0 | 1 |
| 2017 | 6–4 | 60.0% | #89 | 1,612 | 0 | 0 | 2025 | 4–8 | 33.3% | #279 | 1,697 | 0 | 1 |
| 2018 | 26–17 | 60.5% | #32 | 1,795 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2019 | 36–17 | 67.9% | #15 | 1,903 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2020 | 14–11 | 56.0% | #18 | 1,805 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2021 | 15–21 | 41.7% | #54 | 1,658 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2022 | 25–17 | 59.5% | #38 | 1,794 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2023 | 20–19 | 51.3% | #40 | 1,808 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2024 | 9–18 | 33.3% | #122 | 1,649 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2025 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #209 | 1,611 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |