H2H data updated: 2026-07-17 22:32 UTC

Polona Hercog vs Angelique Kerber H2H: 3-3

Polona Hercog and Angelique Kerber are tied 3–3 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 6 main-draw meetings, Angelique Kerber leads 3–2 on hard courts, while Polona Hercog leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Polona Hercog won the 2019 Beijing third round 6-4 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Polona Hercog
SLO Age 35 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
3 – 3
6 main draw meetings
Angelique Kerber
GER Age 38 Left-Handed 173 cm / 5'8"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Oct 1, 2019 Beijing WTA 1000 R32 Hard Polona Hercog #51 6-4 6-2 Angelique Kerber #13 Match data
Jan 16, 2019* Australian Open Grand Slam R128 Hard Angelique Kerber #2 6-2 6-2 Polona Hercog #92 Match data
Aug 31, 2016* US Open Grand Slam R128 Hard Angelique Kerber #2 6-0 1-0 (ret.) Polona Hercog #120 Match data
Mar 3, 2011* Monterrey WTA 500 R32 Hard Polona Hercog #62 6-3 6-3 Angelique Kerber #66 Match data
Oct 23, 2010* Luxembourg WTA 250 QF Hard Angelique Kerber #52 6-4 6-2 Polona Hercog #47 Match data
May 20, 2010* Warsaw WTA 500 R32 Clay Polona Hercog #55 6-2 6-3 Angelique Kerber #64 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Polona Hercog #228 #35 1,605 1,768 170 212 44.5% 0 0 0 0 3 3
Angelique Kerber #205 #1 9,080 2,045 461 270 63.1% 3 0 0 10 1 14

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Polona Hercog Angelique Kerber
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 2007 0–1 0.0% #375 1,488 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 2008 0–2 0.0% #245 1,470 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 2009 6–8 42.9% #68 1,501 0 0 2006 1–1 50.0% #172 1,515 0 0
19 2010 26–24 52.0% #47 1,671 0 0 2007 6–10 37.5% #88 1,548 0 0
20 2011 27–25 51.9% #36 1,699 0 1 2008 7–14 33.3% #100 1,504 0 0
21 2012 14–20 41.2% #76 1,676 0 2 2009 3–6 33.3% #117 1,512 0 0
22 2013 10–10 50.0% #65 1,701 0 2 2010 23–19 54.8% #46 1,668 0 0
23 2014 12–16 42.9% #97 1,647 0 2 2011 17–20 45.9% #32 1,675 0 0
24 2015 19–23 45.2% #73 1,609 0 2 2012 57–20 74.0% #5 1,983 0 2
25 2016 10–16 38.5% #143 1,573 0 2 2013 45–22 67.2% #9 1,947 0 3
26 2017 2–2 50.0% #101 1,584 0 2 2014 43–22 66.2% #9 1,895 0 3
27 2018 15–19 44.1% #85 1,626 0 2 2015 51–22 69.9% #10 1,917 0 7
28 2019 19–21 47.5% #49 1,714 0 3 2016 54–16 77.1% #1 2,024 2 10
29 2020 6–8 42.9% #49 1,683 0 3 2017 28–23 54.9% #21 1,767 2 10
30 2021 4–15 21.1% #134 1,590 0 3 2018 43–16 72.9% #2 1,924 3 12
31 — — — — — — — 2019 28–19 59.6% #20 1,800 3 12
32 2023 0–1 0.0% #267 1,565 0 3 2020 7–6 53.8% #25 1,764 3 12
33 — — — — — — — 2021 29–15 65.9% #16 1,933 3 13
34 — — — — — — — 2022 13–9 59.1% #104 1,878 3 14
35 2026 0–1 0.0% #228 1,628 0 3 — — — — — — —
36 — — — — — — — 2024 6–10 37.5% #205 1,788 3 14