H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 04:32 UTC

Polona Hercog vs Ekaterina Makarova H2H: 2-4

Ekaterina Makarova holds a 4–2 lead over Polona Hercog in their WTA head-to-head. Across 6 main-draw meetings, Ekaterina Makarova leads 4–2 on hard courts. Most recently, Polona Hercog won the 2015 Toronto third round 6-2 6-7(2) 7-5.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Polona Hercog
SLO Age 35 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
2 – 4
6 main draw meetings
Ekaterina Makarova
RUS Age 38 Left-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Aug 13, 2015* Toronto WTA 1000 R32 Hard Polona Hercog #71 6-2 6-7(2) 7-5 Ekaterina Makarova #12 Match data
Oct 2, 2014* Beijing WTA 1000 R32 Hard Ekaterina Makarova #14 7-5 6-0 Polona Hercog #73 Match data
Aug 28, 2014* US Open Grand Slam R64 Hard Ekaterina Makarova #18 6-1 6-2 Polona Hercog #76 Match data
Aug 28, 2013* US Open Grand Slam R128 Hard Ekaterina Makarova #25 6-2 6-4 Polona Hercog #89 Match data
Oct 4, 2012* Beijing WTA 1000 R32 Hard Polona Hercog #90 7-6(5) 3-6 7-6(3) Ekaterina Makarova #20 Match data
Sep 20, 2012* Seoul WTA 250 R32 Hard Ekaterina Makarova #28 6-4 6-1 Polona Hercog #76 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Polona Hercog #228 #35 1,605 1,768 170 212 44.5% 0 0 0 0 3 3
Ekaterina Makarova #1,000 #8 3,620 1,940 248 222 52.8% 0 0 0 2 1 3

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Polona Hercog Ekaterina Makarova
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 2007 0–1 0.0% #375 1,488 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 2008 0–2 0.0% #245 1,470 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 2009 6–8 42.9% #68 1,501 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 2010 26–24 52.0% #47 1,671 0 0 2007 2–2 50.0% #110 1,536 0 0
20 2011 27–25 51.9% #36 1,699 0 1 2008 17–20 45.9% #46 1,626 0 0
21 2012 14–20 41.2% #76 1,676 0 2 2009 19–22 46.3% #60 1,634 0 0
22 2013 10–10 50.0% #65 1,701 0 2 2010 14–20 41.2% #49 1,662 0 1
23 2014 12–16 42.9% #97 1,647 0 2 2011 15–23 39.5% #53 1,604 0 1
24 2015 19–23 45.2% #73 1,609 0 2 2012 26–19 57.8% #20 1,757 0 1
25 2016 10–16 38.5% #143 1,573 0 2 2013 24–18 57.1% #24 1,838 0 1
26 2017 2–2 50.0% #101 1,584 0 2 2014 39–21 65.0% #11 1,837 0 2
27 2018 15–19 44.1% #85 1,626 0 2 2015 26–16 61.9% #23 1,784 0 2
28 2019 19–21 47.5% #49 1,714 0 3 2016 23–18 56.1% #30 1,782 0 2
29 2020 6–8 42.9% #49 1,683 0 3 2017 27–21 56.2% #33 1,836 0 3
30 2021 4–15 21.1% #134 1,590 0 3 2018 16–19 45.7% #57 1,750 0 3
31 — — — — — — — 2019 0–3 0.0% #997 1,700 0 3
32 2023 0–1 0.0% #267 1,565 0 3 — — — — — — —
35 2026 0–1 0.0% #228 1,628 0 3 — — — — — — —