H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 10:32 UTC
Polona Hercog vs Zarina Diyas H2H: 1-0
Polona Hercog holds a 1–0 lead over Zarina Diyas in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Polona Hercog leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Polona Hercog won the 2015 US Open first round 6-2 7-5.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
SLO
Age 35
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
KAZ
Age 32
Right-Handed
172 cm / 5'8"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 2, 2015* | US Open | Grand Slam | R128 | Hard | Polona Hercog | 6-2 7-5 | Zarina Diyas | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Polona Hercog | #228 | #35 | 1,605 | 1,768 | 170 | 212 | 44.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
| Zarina Diyas | #437 | #31 | 1,495 | 1,751 | 99 | 127 | 43.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Polona Hercog | Zarina Diyas | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2009 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #242 | 1,527 | 0 | 0 |
| 16 | 2007 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #375 | 1,488 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #172 | 1,539 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | 2008 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #245 | 1,470 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #227 | 1,503 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 2009 | 6–8 | 42.9% | #68 | 1,501 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #264 | 1,476 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2010 | 26–24 | 52.0% | #47 | 1,671 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #163 | 1,477 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2011 | 27–25 | 51.9% | #36 | 1,699 | 0 | 1 | 2014 | 20–14 | 58.8% | #33 | 1,683 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2012 | 14–20 | 41.2% | #76 | 1,676 | 0 | 2 | 2015 | 20–27 | 42.6% | #52 | 1,576 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2013 | 10–10 | 50.0% | #65 | 1,701 | 0 | 2 | 2016 | 8–12 | 40.0% | #150 | 1,558 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2014 | 12–16 | 42.9% | #97 | 1,647 | 0 | 2 | 2017 | 7–4 | 63.6% | #66 | 1,667 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 2015 | 19–23 | 45.2% | #73 | 1,609 | 0 | 2 | 2018 | 13–19 | 40.6% | #89 | 1,718 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 2016 | 10–16 | 38.5% | #143 | 1,573 | 0 | 2 | 2019 | 7–14 | 33.3% | #77 | 1,697 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 2017 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #101 | 1,584 | 0 | 2 | 2020 | 5–6 | 45.5% | #80 | 1,655 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 2018 | 15–19 | 44.1% | #85 | 1,626 | 0 | 2 | 2021 | 13–16 | 44.8% | #102 | 1,688 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 2019 | 19–21 | 47.5% | #49 | 1,714 | 0 | 3 | 2022 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1031 | 1,680 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | 2020 | 6–8 | 42.9% | #49 | 1,683 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2021 | 4–15 | 21.1% | #134 | 1,590 | 0 | 3 | 2024 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #382 | 1,632 | 0 | 1 |
| 32 | 2023 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #267 | 1,565 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 35 | 2026 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #228 | 1,628 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |