H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 07:17 UTC
Qinwen Zheng vs Barbora Krejcikova H2H: 2-1
Qinwen Zheng holds a 2–1 lead over Barbora Krejcikova in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Qinwen Zheng leads 2–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Barbora Krejcikova won the 2026 Athens quarterfinal 6-4 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CHN
Age 23
Right-Handed
178 cm / 5'10"
H2H
2
–
1
3 main draw meetings
CZE
Age 30
Right-Handed
178 cm / 5'10"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 17, 2026 | Athens | WTA 250 | QF | Hard | Barbora Krejcikova | 6-4 6-4 | Qinwen Zheng | Match data |
| Nov 8, 2024* | Riyadh Finals | WTA Finals | SF | Hard | Qinwen Zheng | 6-3 7-5 | Barbora Krejcikova | Match data |
| Oct 15, 2023 | Zhengzhou | WTA 500 | F | Hard | Qinwen Zheng | 2-6 6-2 6-4 | Barbora Krejcikova | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Qinwen Zheng | #135 | #5 | 5,340 | 2,075 | 131 | 79 | 62.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 4 |
| Barbora Krejcikova | #32 | #2 | 5,533 | 2,028 | 167 | 101 | 62.3% | 2 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 8 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Qinwen Zheng | Barbora Krejcikova | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 2021 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #126 | 1,559 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #174 | 1,503 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2022 | 22–17 | 56.4% | #28 | 1,829 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #188 | 1,488 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2023 | 35–19 | 64.8% | #15 | 1,983 | 0 | 2 | 2016 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #252 | 1,507 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2024 | 42–17 | 71.2% | #5 | 2,060 | 0 | 4 | 2017 | 7–6 | 53.8% | #126 | 1,580 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2025 | 20–12 | 62.5% | #24 | 1,996 | 0 | 4 | 2018 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #204 | 1,553 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2026 | 11–11 | 50.0% | #135 | 1,882 | 0 | 4 | 2019 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #131 | 1,553 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2020 | 9–5 | 64.3% | #65 | 1,707 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 42–15 | 73.7% | #5 | 1,955 | 1 | 3 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2022 | 26–15 | 63.4% | #22 | 1,928 | 1 | 5 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2023 | 32–18 | 64.0% | #10 | 1,910 | 1 | 7 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2024 | 18–15 | 54.5% | #10 | 1,893 | 2 | 8 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2025 | 14–9 | 60.9% | #65 | 1,895 | 2 | 8 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2026 | 13–7 | 65.0% | #32 | 1,943 | 2 | 8 |