H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Qinwen Zheng vs Emiliana Arango H2H: 2-0
Qinwen Zheng holds a 2–0 lead over Emiliana Arango in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Qinwen Zheng leads 1–0 on clay and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Qinwen Zheng won the 2025 Beijing second round 6-3 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CHN
Age 23
Right-Handed
178 cm / 5'10"
H2H
2
–
0
2 main draw meetings
COL
Age 25
Right-Handed
172 cm / 5'8"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 27, 2025 | Beijing | WTA 1000 | R64 | Hard | Qinwen Zheng | 6-3 6-2 | Emiliana Arango | Match data |
| May 28, 2025 | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R64 | Clay | Qinwen Zheng | 6-2 6-3 | Emiliana Arango | Match data |
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Qinwen Zheng | #135 | #5 | 5,340 | 2,075 | 131 | 79 | 62.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 4 |
| Emiliana Arango | #96 | #46 | 1,229 | 1,700 | 30 | 46 | 39.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Qinwen Zheng | Emiliana Arango | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2016 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #825 | 1,484 | 0 | 0 |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2017 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #502 | 1,467 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2018 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #405 | 1,488 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 2021 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #126 | 1,559 | 0 | 0 | 2019 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #545 | 1,475 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2022 | 22–17 | 56.4% | #28 | 1,829 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2023 | 35–19 | 64.8% | #15 | 1,983 | 0 | 2 | 2021 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #240 | 1,480 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2024 | 42–17 | 71.2% | #5 | 2,060 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2025 | 20–12 | 62.5% | #24 | 1,996 | 0 | 4 | 2023 | 7–4 | 63.6% | #116 | 1,623 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2026 | 11–11 | 50.0% | #135 | 1,882 | 0 | 4 | 2024 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #169 | 1,557 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2025 | 11–15 | 42.3% | #49 | 1,649 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2026 | 7–15 | 31.8% | #96 | 1,602 | 0 | 0 |