H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC

Qinwen Zheng vs Lesia Tsurenko H2H: 0-1

Lesia Tsurenko holds a 1–0 lead over Qinwen Zheng in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Lesia Tsurenko leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Lesia Tsurenko won the 2021 Moscow first round 6-4 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Qinwen Zheng
China Age 23 Right-Handed 178 cm / 5'10"
H2H
0 – 1
1 main-draw meetings
Lesia Tsurenko
Ukraine Age 37 Right-Handed 174 cm / 5'9"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Lesia Tsurenko #145 6-4 6-3 Qinwen Zheng #158 Match data Oct 21, 2021* R32 Moscow WTA 500 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS Olympics 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Qinwen Zheng #121 #4 5,340 2,105 141 82 63.2% 0 1 0 0 2 2 5
Lesia Tsurenko #386 #23 2,030 1,898 180 202 47.1% 0 0 0 0 0 4 4

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Qinwen Zheng Lesia Tsurenko
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 2021 1–3 25.0% #126 1,560 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 2022 22–17 56.4% #28 1,829 0 0 — — — — — — —
20 2023 35–20 63.6% #15 1,964 0 2 2009 0–1 0.0% #284 1,483 0 0
21 2024 48–17 73.8% #5 2,089 0 5 2010 1–3 25.0% #155 1,468 0 0
22 2025 20–12 62.5% #24 2,005 0 5 2011 3–7 30.0% #113 1,467 0 0
23 2026 15–13 53.6% #121 1,925 0 5 2012 7–12 36.8% #116 1,484 0 0
24 — — — — — — — 2013 11–18 37.9% #68 1,505 0 0
25 — — — — — — — 2014 4–8 33.3% #92 1,510 0 0
26 — — — — — — — 2015 22–17 56.4% #33 1,720 0 1
27 — — — — — — — 2016 19–20 48.7% #57 1,724 0 2
28 — — — — — — — 2017 22–24 47.8% #42 1,688 0 3
29 — — — — — — — 2018 26–19 57.8% #27 1,808 0 4
30 — — — — — — — 2019 14–14 50.0% #73 1,735 0 4
31 — — — — — — — 2020 1–3 25.0% #146 1,766 0 4
32 — — — — — — — 2021 6–10 37.5% #118 1,746 0 4
33 — — — — — — — 2022 10–11 47.6% #137 1,765 0 4
34 — — — — — — — 2023 24–15 61.5% #31 1,870 0 4
35 — — — — — — — 2024 10–20 33.3% #115 1,697 0 4

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Qinwen Zheng Lesia Tsurenko
Yr HardClayGrass Yr HardClayGrass
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
18 2021 0 2 2 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2022 16 11 27 59.3% 4 3 7 57.1% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 2023 24 13 37 64.9% 11 4 15 73.3% 0 3 3 0.0% 2009 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
21 2024 30 11 41 73.2% 17 4 21 81.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 2010 0 1 1 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
22 2025 8 6 14 57.1% 10 4 14 71.4% 2 2 4 50.0% 2011 1 3 4 25.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
23 2026 10 6 16 62.5% 3 3 6 50.0% 2 4 6 33.3% 2012 4 7 11 36.4% 3 4 7 42.9% 0 1 1 0.0%
24 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2013 7 10 17 41.2% 1 5 6 16.7% 3 3 6 50.0%
25 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2014 3 6 9 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
26 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2015 20 12 32 62.5% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 3 4 25.0%
27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2016 14 11 25 56.0% 4 6 10 40.0% 1 3 4 25.0%
28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2017 14 15 29 48.3% 3 5 8 37.5% 5 4 9 55.6%
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2018 20 14 34 58.8% 3 3 6 50.0% 3 2 5 60.0%
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2019 10 6 16 62.5% 2 4 6 33.3% 2 4 6 33.3%
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2020 0 2 2 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2021 5 9 14 35.7% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2022 2 5 7 28.6% 3 3 6 50.0% 5 3 8 62.5%
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2023 13 10 23 56.5% 8 4 12 66.7% 3 1 4 75.0%
35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2024 9 15 24 37.5% 1 4 5 20.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
Career — 88 49 137 64.2% 46 19 65 70.8% 7 14 21 33.3% — 122 127 249 49.0% 34 48 82 41.5% 24 27 51 47.1%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 206/223 of Qinwen Zheng's and 353/383 of Lesia Tsurenko's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Qinwen Zheng Lesia Tsurenko
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
18 2021 4/4 4.0 6.0 44.2% 76.6% 41.4% 64.5% 49.6% 56.8% 34.5% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
19 2022 37/39 6.8 5.7 52.2% 76.1% 45.3% 61.3% 43.8% 61.5% 42.9% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
20 2023 52/55 6.6 4.2 51.4% 74.7% 45.7% 59.8% 48.0% 60.6% 43.5% 2009 1/1 0.0 0.0 67.3% 54.3% 41.2% 55.6% 16.7% 50.0% 38.6%
21 2024 59/65 6.7 3.6 52.9% 76.9% 47.4% 57.6% 49.0% 63.0% 44.1% 2010 4/4 1.0 3.8 61.0% 59.3% 41.5% 45.5% 53.9% 52.3% 39.6%
22 2025 26/32 4.5 3.8 55.3% 70.7% 46.4% 49.9% 55.0% 59.9% 45.6% 2011 10/10 1.0 4.5 66.1% 57.8% 37.4% 47.0% 48.7% 50.7% 44.4%
23 2026 28/28 8.2 4.7 52.8% 74.5% 47.8% 56.6% 46.6% 61.8% 38.3% 2012 17/19 0.6 6.3 61.4% 56.3% 38.9% 40.3% 55.0% 49.7% 45.7%
24 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2013 27/29 1.3 5.2 61.6% 59.8% 45.0% 44.2% 53.6% 54.0% 45.8%
25 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2014 12/12 2.3 5.6 58.7% 59.9% 45.7% 52.5% 41.0% 54.5% 42.5%
26 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2015 31/39 1.5 4.3 69.1% 63.2% 53.5% 55.0% 49.7% 59.5% 44.8%
27 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2016 35/39 1.6 5.0 64.8% 60.5% 44.8% 50.5% 53.2% 54.9% 45.5%
28 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2017 44/46 1.6 4.1 65.6% 61.5% 44.4% 49.1% 52.0% 55.6% 45.4%
29 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2018 41/45 1.8 4.5 64.4% 61.8% 46.5% 54.0% 47.5% 56.2% 46.0%
30 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2019 28/28 1.6 3.3 69.7% 59.1% 43.8% 51.0% 54.3% 54.4% 44.8%
31 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2020 3/4 1.0 4.0 65.0% 53.6% 42.6% 35.2% 43.8% 50.0% 42.8%
32 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2021 16/16 0.0 3.0 65.8% 55.1% 43.1% 45.6% 55.2% 51.2% 49.3%
33 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2022 19/21 0.3 3.2 64.4% 53.7% 43.8% 49.8% 49.2% 49.9% 45.1%
34 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2023 37/40 0.1 3.1 66.2% 57.5% 43.0% 47.8% 54.7% 52.7% 50.3%
35 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2024 28/30 0.2 4.9 63.5% 55.1% 40.2% 47.0% 46.8% 49.5% 43.7%
Career — 206/223 6.6 4.3 52.5% 75.1% 46.4% 57.8% 48.2% 61.5% 42.9% — 353/383 1.1 4.3 65.1% 59.1% 44.4% 49.2% 51.1% 53.9% 45.7%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Qinwen Zheng Lesia Tsurenko
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 2019 1493 105.9 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 2021 1560 120.6 +0.23 -1.61 0.799 46.5% — — — 25.0% -1.25 — 0–1 — -0.10 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2022 1830 148.1 +4.12 +1.19 1.114 52.1% -26 -69 -222 52.9% +0.10 9–8 (53%) 9–5 (64%) 108.5 -0.97 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 2023 1965 158.6 +3.42 +1.11 1.104 51.9% +22 -50 -426 59.4% +0.73 16–6 (73%) 7–4 (64%) 110.5 -0.43 2009 1483 96.1 -0.16 -0.74 0.771 43.4% — — — 0.0% -3.50 — — — +0.15
21 2024 2090 165.0 +5.64 +2.11 1.193 53.3% +1 +11 -537 66.0% +1.35 19–5 (79%) 7–7 (50%) 108.7 +0.04 2010 1468 101.2 -1.44 -1.76 0.831 46.3% — +62 — 25.0% -1.88 — 1–0 — +0.08
22 2025 2006 154.2 +2.79 +2.67 1.138 52.7% +23 +110 -458 62.5% +0.82 3–5 (38%) 4–4 (50%) 96.8 -0.14 2011 1468 104.4 -3.16 -0.61 0.900 47.5% +23 +64 — 23.5% -1.41 1–0 0–2 — -0.34
23 2026 1926 146.7 +3.33 -2.30 1.002 49.9% +102 +128 -369 50.0% +0.04 10–6 (63%) 4–2 (67%) 104.2 -1.12 2012 1485 109.3 -4.45 +0.03 0.909 47.7% 0 +73 — 40.9% -0.71 4–4 (50%) 3–1 (75%) 102.4 +0.05
24 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2013 1505 119.0 -1.69 +1.15 0.995 49.9% +10 -7 +46 40.6% -0.36 4–6 (40%) 1–4 (20%) 97.5 +0.31
25 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2014 1510 105.5 -1.40 -0.49 0.933 48.6% -11 — — 36.7% -0.70 3–3 (50%) 2–2 (50%) 100.7 +0.32
26 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2015 1721 139.7 +1.11 +2.63 1.105 52.2% +8 — -177 59.3% +0.80 5–6 (45%) 6–5 (55%) 102.2 +0.25
27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2016 1725 125.5 -0.94 +1.32 1.009 50.2% +25 -190 -217 50.6% +0.07 7–3 (70%) 3–6 (33%) 103.6 +1.38
28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2017 1689 134.1 -0.08 +2.63 1.024 50.6% +20 -134 -107 47.9% -0.10 5–7 (42%) 7–6 (54%) 100.9 -1.57
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2018 1808 142.9 -0.18 +2.84 1.051 51.2% +2 -219 -158 60.4% +0.77 8–3 (73%) 5–3 (63%) 106.6 +0.69
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2019 1736 136.2 -1.34 +1.80 0.981 49.5% +99 -130 -117 46.6% -0.22 3–1 (75%) 1–3 (25%) 100.6 -0.24
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2020 1767 118.5 +0.32 +2.54 0.856 46.8% — — — 42.9% -1.14 0–1 — — -0.91
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2021 1746 128.4 -2.98 +2.74 1.009 50.1% +22 — — 43.8% -0.44 0–4 (0%) 1–1 — -0.04
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2022 1766 127.9 -3.73 +2.57 0.901 47.5% -41 -82 -3 57.5% +0.18 5–3 (63%) 2–2 (50%) 102.9 -1.59
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2023 1870 139.4 -2.54 +6.34 1.063 51.5% -23 -32 -93 62.0% +0.68 7–2 (78%) 3–1 (75%) 107.3 -1.77
35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2024 1697 119.9 -5.55 +0.83 0.866 46.6% +16 +33 — 41.4% -0.93 4–4 (50%) 1–0 — +0.10
Career — 2106 160.3 +4.03 +1.09 1.114 52.1% +16 +21 -383 58.8% +0.69 57–30 (66%) 31–23 (57%) 113.3 -1.23 — 1898 136.0 -1.67 +2.21 0.991 49.8% +13 -65 -90 49.5% -0.03 56–47 (54%) 36–36 (50%) 105.0 -0.84

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.