H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC
Qinwen Zheng holds a 3–2 lead over Maria Sakkari in their WTA head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, Maria Sakkari leads 2–1 on hard courts, while Qinwen Zheng leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Qinwen Zheng won the 2026 Nottingham Open first round 4-6 7-6(1) 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
| Player | Score | Player | Match Data | Date | Round | Tournament | Category | Surface |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Qinwen Zheng | 4-6 7-6(1) 6-4 | Maria Sakkari | Match data | Jun 15, 2026 | R32 | Nottingham Open | WTA 250 | Grass |
| Qinwen Zheng | 6-4 6-1 | Maria Sakkari | Match data | Apr 2, 2025 | R32 | Charleston Open | WTA 500 | Clay |
| Qinwen Zheng | 7-6(2) 6-3 | Maria Sakkari | Match data | Oct 13, 2023* | R16 | Zhengzhou | WTA 500 | Hard |
| Maria Sakkari | 6-2 3-6 6-3 | Qinwen Zheng | Match data | Feb 15, 2023* | R32 | Qatar Open | WTA 500 | Hard |
| Maria Sakkari | 6-1 6-4 | Qinwen Zheng | Match data | Jan 20, 2022* | R64 | Australian Open | Grand Slam | Hard |
Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | Olympics | 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories | Finals | 500 including documented historical predecessor categories | 250 including documented historical predecessor categories | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Qinwen Zheng | #121 | #4 | 5,340 | 2,105 | 141 | 82 | 63.2% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 5 |
| Maria Sakkari | #35 | #3 | 5,085 | 2,034 | 266 | 211 | 55.8% | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Qinwen Zheng | Maria Sakkari | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 2021 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #126 | 1,560 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2022 | 22–17 | 56.4% | #28 | 1,829 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #169 | 1,479 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2023 | 35–20 | 63.6% | #15 | 1,964 | 0 | 2 | 2016 | 5–12 | 29.4% | #98 | 1,497 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2024 | 48–17 | 73.8% | #5 | 2,089 | 0 | 5 | 2017 | 18–17 | 51.4% | #53 | 1,681 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2025 | 20–12 | 62.5% | #24 | 2,005 | 0 | 5 | 2018 | 22–24 | 47.8% | #41 | 1,682 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2026 | 15–13 | 53.6% | #121 | 1,925 | 0 | 5 | 2019 | 29–22 | 56.9% | #23 | 1,801 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2020 | 20–11 | 64.5% | #22 | 1,884 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 38–20 | 65.5% | #6 | 1,955 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2022 | 40–23 | 63.5% | #6 | 1,919 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2023 | 35–24 | 59.3% | #9 | 1,883 | 0 | 2 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2024 | 21–15 | 58.3% | #32 | 1,838 | 0 | 2 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2025 | 20–25 | 44.4% | #52 | 1,782 | 0 | 2 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2026 | 18–17 | 51.4% | #35 | 1,820 | 0 | 2 |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.
| Age | Qinwen Zheng | Maria Sakkari | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | |||||||||||||||||||
| W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | |||
| 18 | 2021 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2022 | 16 | 11 | 27 | 59.3% | 4 | 3 | 7 | 57.1% | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% | 2015 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2023 | 24 | 13 | 37 | 64.9% | 11 | 4 | 15 | 73.3% | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.0% | 2016 | 2 | 9 | 11 | 18.2% | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% |
| 21 | 2024 | 30 | 11 | 41 | 73.2% | 17 | 4 | 21 | 81.0% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 2017 | 9 | 7 | 16 | 56.3% | 5 | 8 | 13 | 38.5% | 4 | 2 | 6 | 66.7% |
| 22 | 2025 | 8 | 6 | 14 | 57.1% | 10 | 4 | 14 | 71.4% | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | 2018 | 15 | 17 | 32 | 46.9% | 7 | 4 | 11 | 63.6% | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.0% |
| 23 | 2026 | 10 | 6 | 16 | 62.5% | 3 | 3 | 6 | 50.0% | 2 | 4 | 6 | 33.3% | 2019 | 11 | 13 | 24 | 45.8% | 13 | 5 | 18 | 72.2% | 5 | 4 | 9 | 55.6% |
| 24 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2020 | 18 | 9 | 27 | 66.7% | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 28 | 15 | 43 | 65.1% | 9 | 4 | 13 | 69.2% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2022 | 25 | 14 | 39 | 64.1% | 8 | 5 | 13 | 61.5% | 7 | 4 | 11 | 63.6% |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2023 | 26 | 17 | 43 | 60.5% | 5 | 4 | 9 | 55.6% | 4 | 3 | 7 | 57.1% |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2024 | 10 | 7 | 17 | 58.8% | 9 | 5 | 14 | 64.3% | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2025 | 11 | 16 | 27 | 40.7% | 6 | 6 | 12 | 50.0% | 3 | 3 | 6 | 50.0% |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2026 | 13 | 9 | 22 | 59.1% | 3 | 5 | 8 | 37.5% | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% |
| Career | — | 88 | 49 | 137 | 64.2% | 46 | 19 | 65 | 70.8% | 7 | 14 | 21 | 33.3% | — | 168 | 134 | 302 | 55.6% | 69 | 50 | 119 | 58.0% | 29 | 27 | 56 | 51.8% |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 206/223 of Qinwen Zheng's and 452/476 of Maria Sakkari's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.
| Age | Qinwen Zheng | Maria Sakkari | ||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Sample | Aces/M | DFs/M | 1st Sv% | 1st Pts% | 2nd Pts% | BP Saved% | BP Conv% | Svc Pts% | Ret Pts% | Yr | Sample | Aces/M | DFs/M | 1st Sv% | 1st Pts% | 2nd Pts% | BP Saved% | BP Conv% | Svc Pts% | Ret Pts% | |
| 18 | 2021 | 4/4 | 4.0 | 6.0 | 44.2% | 76.6% | 41.4% | 64.5% | 49.6% | 56.8% | 34.5% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2022 | 37/39 | 6.8 | 5.7 | 52.2% | 76.1% | 45.3% | 61.3% | 43.8% | 61.5% | 42.9% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2023 | 52/55 | 6.6 | 4.2 | 51.4% | 74.7% | 45.7% | 59.8% | 48.0% | 60.6% | 43.5% | 2016 | 17/17 | 2.2 | 1.9 | 70.8% | 59.0% | 39.3% | 49.2% | 38.2% | 53.2% | 43.5% |
| 21 | 2024 | 59/65 | 6.7 | 3.6 | 52.9% | 76.9% | 47.4% | 57.6% | 49.0% | 63.0% | 44.1% | 2017 | 34/35 | 2.0 | 2.3 | 66.5% | 59.8% | 45.7% | 47.5% | 48.3% | 55.0% | 43.1% |
| 22 | 2025 | 26/32 | 4.5 | 3.8 | 55.3% | 70.7% | 46.4% | 49.9% | 55.0% | 59.9% | 45.6% | 2018 | 45/46 | 2.5 | 3.8 | 58.6% | 63.6% | 47.3% | 54.1% | 49.5% | 56.8% | 42.6% |
| 23 | 2026 | 28/28 | 8.2 | 4.7 | 52.8% | 74.5% | 47.8% | 56.6% | 46.6% | 61.8% | 38.3% | 2019 | 51/51 | 4.0 | 4.1 | 58.3% | 65.3% | 47.4% | 54.0% | 48.7% | 58.1% | 44.7% |
| 24 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2020 | 31/31 | 4.6 | 3.9 | 60.8% | 67.5% | 50.3% | 52.5% | 44.3% | 60.6% | 43.3% |
| 25 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 51/58 | 4.3 | 3.8 | 56.7% | 70.7% | 47.6% | 60.0% | 45.4% | 60.6% | 44.7% |
| 26 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2022 | 63/63 | 4.1 | 3.7 | 58.5% | 68.7% | 49.4% | 56.8% | 43.5% | 60.7% | 43.4% |
| 27 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2023 | 59/59 | 3.7 | 3.3 | 59.6% | 67.2% | 48.5% | 61.6% | 44.4% | 59.5% | 43.0% |
| 28 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2024 | 32/36 | 3.3 | 3.4 | 59.1% | 68.5% | 46.1% | 58.0% | 46.4% | 59.4% | 42.9% |
| 29 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2025 | 35/45 | 3.0 | 3.5 | 60.2% | 63.2% | 46.5% | 50.3% | 42.9% | 56.3% | 42.9% |
| 30 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2026 | 34/35 | 2.9 | 2.4 | 61.6% | 64.1% | 51.0% | 52.1% | 52.4% | 58.6% | 42.2% |
| Career | — | 206/223 | 6.6 | 4.3 | 52.5% | 75.1% | 46.4% | 57.8% | 48.2% | 61.5% | 42.9% | — | 452/477 | 3.5 | 3.4 | 60.1% | 65.9% | 47.7% | 55.1% | 46.0% | 58.5% | 43.4% |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.
| Age | Qinwen Zheng | Maria Sakkari | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | |
| 16 | 2019 | 1493 | 105.9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2021 | 1560 | 120.6 | +0.23 | -1.61 | 0.799 | 46.5% | — | — | — | 25.0% | -1.25 | — | 0–1 | — | -0.10 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2022 | 1830 | 148.1 | +4.12 | +1.19 | 1.114 | 52.1% | -26 | -69 | -222 | 52.9% | +0.10 | 9–8 (53%) | 9–5 (64%) | 108.5 | -0.97 | 2015 | 1480 | 95.8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0.0% | -3.00 | — | — | — | +0.33 |
| 20 | 2023 | 1965 | 158.6 | +3.42 | +1.11 | 1.104 | 51.9% | +22 | -50 | -426 | 59.4% | +0.73 | 16–6 (73%) | 7–4 (64%) | 110.5 | -0.43 | 2016 | 1498 | 118.0 | -1.88 | -0.74 | 0.929 | 48.0% | -42 | +76 | — | 39.5% | -0.84 | 2–7 (22%) | 1–2 (33%) | — | -0.27 |
| 21 | 2024 | 2090 | 165.0 | +5.64 | +2.11 | 1.193 | 53.3% | +1 | +11 | -537 | 66.0% | +1.35 | 19–5 (79%) | 7–7 (50%) | 108.7 | +0.04 | 2017 | 1682 | 121.4 | -0.82 | -0.68 | 0.959 | 49.1% | -31 | -161 | -2 | 50.0% | -0.47 | 7–5 (58%) | 6–2 (75%) | 106.7 | +0.44 |
| 22 | 2025 | 2006 | 154.2 | +2.79 | +2.67 | 1.138 | 52.7% | +23 | +110 | -458 | 62.5% | +0.82 | 3–5 (38%) | 4–4 (50%) | 96.8 | -0.14 | 2018 | 1683 | 137.5 | +0.35 | +0.12 | 0.988 | 50.0% | -28 | -6 | -50 | 50.0% | -0.06 | 4–8 (33%) | 6–3 (67%) | 99.9 | +0.34 |
| 23 | 2026 | 1926 | 146.7 | +3.33 | -2.30 | 1.002 | 49.9% | +102 | +128 | -369 | 50.0% | +0.04 | 10–6 (63%) | 4–2 (67%) | 104.2 | -1.12 | 2019 | 1802 | 145.4 | +1.49 | +2.58 | 1.067 | 51.3% | -77 | +60 | -130 | 54.6% | +0.29 | 10–9 (53%) | 6–6 (50%) | 103.4 | -0.39 |
| 24 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2020 | 1885 | 152.6 | +2.80 | +1.40 | 1.098 | 51.8% | +7 | -62 | — | 61.8% | +0.51 | 7–7 (50%) | 9–1 (90%) | 106.7 | +0.50 |
| 25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 1955 | 163.4 | +4.17 | +3.15 | 1.135 | 52.3% | +3 | -36 | — | 64.3% | +0.98 | 8–11 (42%) | 5–8 (38%) | 94.2 | -1.76 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2022 | 1919 | 155.0 | +3.75 | +1.73 | 1.104 | 51.9% | +44 | +18 | -164 | 61.6% | +0.74 | 12–12 (50%) | 7–10 (41%) | 93.6 | +1.65 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2023 | 1884 | 156.5 | +2.61 | +1.63 | 1.060 | 51.1% | +44 | +25 | -123 | 55.9% | +0.47 | 12–8 (60%) | 6–8 (43%) | 99.9 | +0.82 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2024 | 1839 | 149.7 | +2.38 | +0.63 | 1.058 | 51.4% | +92 | +66 | -85 | 58.4% | +0.87 | 4–5 (44%) | 2–4 (33%) | 97.5 | +2.20 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2025 | 1782 | 142.5 | +0.02 | -0.02 | 0.982 | 49.5% | +21 | +84 | -66 | 44.4% | -0.39 | 5–5 (50%) | 7–6 (54%) | 99.1 | -1.36 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2026 | 1820 | 146.8 | +1.96 | +0.37 | 1.021 | 50.5% | +45 | +1 | -112 | 50.6% | +0.12 | 6–5 (55%) | 4–6 (40%) | 98.2 | +0.37 |
| Career | — | 2106 | 160.3 | +4.03 | +1.09 | 1.114 | 52.1% | +16 | +21 | -383 | 58.8% | +0.69 | 57–30 (66%) | 31–23 (57%) | 113.3 | -1.23 | — | 2034 | 152.6 | +1.91 | +1.20 | 1.046 | 50.9% | +11 | +8 | -103 | 55.0% | +0.30 | 77–82 (48%) | 59–56 (51%) | 99.5 | +0.60 |
Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aryna Sabalenka | 1 | 8 | 9 | Mar 23, 2026 | H2H |
| Iga Swiatek | 2 | 6 | 8 | Sep 7, 2026 | H2H |
| Liudmila Samsonova | 3 | 4 | 7 | Jun 1, 2025 | H2H |
| Elena Rybakina | 1 | 5 | 6 | Sep 9, 2026 | H2H |
| Katerina Siniakova | 1 | 4 | 5 | Jun 29, 2026 | H2H |
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jessica Pegula | 5 | 7 | 12 | Jul 30, 2025 | H2H |
| Coco Gauff | 5 | 6 | 11 | Aug 7, 2026 | H2H |
| Anett Kontaveit | 5 | 6 | 11 | Feb 13, 2022 | H2H |
| Iga Swiatek | 4 | 6 | 10 | Aug 17, 2026 | H2H |
| Aryna Sabalenka | 3 | 7 | 10 | Oct 30, 2023 | H2H |