H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 22:32 UTC

Qinwen Zheng vs Venus Williams H2H: 1-0

Qinwen Zheng holds a 1–0 lead over Venus Williams in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Qinwen Zheng leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Qinwen Zheng won the 2023 Cincinnati third round 1-6 6-2 6-1.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Qinwen Zheng
CHN Age 23 Right-Handed 178 cm / 5'10"
H2H
1 – 0
1 main draw meetings
Venus Williams
USA Age 46 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Aug 17, 2023* Cincinnati WTA 1000 R32 Hard Qinwen Zheng #24 1-6 6-2 6-1 Venus Williams #533 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Qinwen Zheng #135 #5 5,340 2,075 131 79 62.4% 0 0 0 2 2 4
Venus Williams #467 #1 7,452 2,362 768 288 72.7% 7 9 1 20 10 47

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Qinwen Zheng Venus Williams
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 — — — — — — — 1994 1–1 50.0% — 1,525 0 0
15 — — — — — — — 1995 2–3 40.0% #205 1,561 0 0
16 — — — — — — — 1996 2–5 28.6% #216 1,571 0 0
17 — — — — — — — 1997 20–13 60.6% #22 1,851 0 0
18 2021 1–3 25.0% #126 1,559 0 0 1998 50–13 79.4% #5 2,094 0 2
19 2022 22–17 56.4% #28 1,829 0 0 1999 57–11 83.8% #3 2,258 0 8
20 2023 35–19 64.8% #15 1,983 0 2 2000 35–4 89.7% #3 2,321 2 13
21 2024 42–17 71.2% #5 2,060 0 4 2001 46–6 88.5% #3 2,338 4 19
22 2025 20–12 62.5% #24 1,996 0 4 2002 63–9 87.5% #2 2,297 4 26
23 2026 11–11 50.0% #135 1,882 0 4 2003 24–5 82.8% #11 2,257 4 27
24 — — — — — — — 2004 40–13 75.5% #9 2,072 4 29
25 — — — — — — — 2005 34–10 77.3% #10 2,085 5 31
26 — — — — — — — 2006 13–6 68.4% #46 2,007 5 31
27 — — — — — — — 2007 46–10 82.1% #8 2,048 6 34
28 — — — — — — — 2008 37–10 78.7% #6 2,133 7 37
29 — — — — — — — 2009 38–16 70.4% #6 1,981 7 39
30 — — — — — — — 2010 38–7 84.4% #5 2,057 7 41
31 — — — — — — — 2011 8–4 66.7% #102 1,994 7 41
32 — — — — — — — 2012 22–8 73.3% #24 2,007 7 42
33 — — — — — — — 2013 15–11 57.7% #47 1,889 7 42
34 — — — — — — — 2014 33–15 68.8% #18 1,874 7 43
35 — — — — — — — 2015 39–14 73.6% #7 1,957 7 46
36 — — — — — — — 2016 24–14 63.2% #17 1,830 7 47
37 — — — — — — — 2017 38–15 71.7% #5 1,935 7 47
38 — — — — — — — 2018 15–11 57.7% #39 1,867 7 47
39 — — — — — — — 2019 20–15 57.1% #52 1,827 7 47
40 — — — — — — — 2020 1–8 11.1% #79 1,717 7 47
41 — — — — — — — 2021 3–9 25.0% #318 1,649 7 47
42 — — — — — — — 2022 0–4 0.0% #1000 1,603 7 47
43 — — — — — — — 2023 3–7 30.0% #412 1,594 7 47