H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 22:32 UTC
Qinwen Zheng vs Vera Zvonareva H2H: 2-0
Qinwen Zheng holds a 2–0 lead over Vera Zvonareva in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Qinwen Zheng leads 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Qinwen Zheng won the 2022 Indian Wells first round 6-3 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CHN
Age 23
Right-Handed
178 cm / 5'10"
H2H
2
–
0
2 main draw meetings
RUS
Age 41
Right-Handed
172 cm / 5'8"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 11, 2022* | Indian Wells | WTA 1000 | R128 | Hard | Qinwen Zheng | 6-3 6-2 | Vera Zvonareva | Match data |
| Jan 7, 2022* | Melbourne 1 | WTA 250 | R16 | Hard | Qinwen Zheng | 5-7 6-3 6-4 | Vera Zvonareva | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Qinwen Zheng | #135 | #5 | 5,340 | 2,075 | 131 | 79 | 62.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 4 |
| Vera Zvonareva | #307 | #2 | 7,935 | 2,077 | 459 | 268 | 63.1% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 5 | 6 | 12 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Qinwen Zheng | Vera Zvonareva | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2000 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #349 | 1,512 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2002 | 19–11 | 63.3% | #45 | 1,680 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 2021 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #126 | 1,559 | 0 | 0 | 2003 | 45–22 | 67.2% | #13 | 1,849 | 0 | 1 |
| 19 | 2022 | 22–17 | 56.4% | #28 | 1,829 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 54–27 | 66.7% | #11 | 1,935 | 0 | 2 |
| 20 | 2023 | 35–19 | 64.8% | #15 | 1,983 | 0 | 2 | 2005 | 21–21 | 50.0% | #42 | 1,683 | 0 | 3 |
| 21 | 2024 | 42–17 | 71.2% | #5 | 2,060 | 0 | 4 | 2006 | 37–22 | 62.7% | #24 | 1,884 | 0 | 5 |
| 22 | 2025 | 20–12 | 62.5% | #24 | 1,996 | 0 | 4 | 2007 | 30–14 | 68.2% | #22 | 1,935 | 0 | 5 |
| 23 | 2026 | 11–11 | 50.0% | #135 | 1,882 | 0 | 4 | 2008 | 58–22 | 72.5% | #7 | 2,005 | 0 | 7 |
| 24 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2009 | 34–14 | 70.8% | #9 | 1,916 | 0 | 9 |
| 25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2010 | 49–18 | 73.1% | #2 | 2,051 | 0 | 10 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2011 | 54–22 | 71.1% | #7 | 1,946 | 0 | 12 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2012 | 9–9 | 50.0% | #95 | 1,808 | 0 | 12 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2014 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #251 | 1,743 | 0 | 12 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2015 | 7–8 | 46.7% | #185 | 1,671 | 0 | 12 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2017 | 3–1 | 75.0% | #200 | 1,676 | 0 | 12 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2018 | 6–9 | 40.0% | #109 | 1,702 | 0 | 12 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2019 | 6–7 | 46.2% | #159 | 1,680 | 0 | 12 |
| 35 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2020 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #164 | 1,731 | 0 | 12 |
| 36 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 11–11 | 50.0% | #81 | 1,753 | 0 | 12 |
| 37 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2022 | 3–8 | 27.3% | #357 | 1,711 | 0 | 12 |
| 38 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2023 | 4–8 | 33.3% | #272 | 1,683 | 0 | 12 |
| 41 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2026 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #307 | 1,646 | 0 | 12 |