H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Raquel Giscafre vs Ilana Kloss H2H: 3-0
Raquel Giscafre holds a 3–0 lead over Ilana Kloss in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Raquel Giscafre leads 1–0 on carpet and 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Raquel Giscafre won the 1975 Sarasota third round 6-3 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ARG
Age 77
H2H
3
–
0
3 main draw meetings
RSA
Age 70
Left-Handed
164 cm / 5'5"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 16, 1975* | Sarasota | WTA 250 | R32 | Carpet | Raquel Giscafre | 6-3 6-3 | Ilana Kloss | Match data |
| Jun 9, 1972* | Manchester | WTA 250 | R16 | Grass | Raquel Giscafre | 6-4 3-6 6-3 | Ilana Kloss | Match data |
| Mar 28, 1972* | Johannesburg | WTA 250 | R128 | Hard | Raquel Giscafre | 6-2 2-6 7-6 | Ilana Kloss | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Raquel Giscafre | — | — | — | 1,797 | 86 | 120 | 41.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
| Ilana Kloss | — | — | — | 1,888 | 135 | 144 | 48.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 8 | 8 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Raquel Giscafre | Ilana Kloss | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 14 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1970 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,491 | 0 | 0 |
| 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1971 | 5–4 | 55.6% | — | 1,559 | 0 | 1 |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1972 | 13–12 | 52.0% | — | 1,591 | 0 | 3 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1973 | 38–18 | 67.9% | — | 1,869 | 0 | 8 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1974 | 19–16 | 54.3% | — | 1,811 | 0 | 8 |
| 19 | 1968 | 5–8 | 38.5% | — | 1,496 | 0 | 0 | 1975 | 9–20 | 31.0% | — | 1,690 | 0 | 8 |
| 20 | 1969 | 9–15 | 37.5% | — | 1,490 | 0 | 0 | 1976 | 18–15 | 54.5% | — | 1,781 | 0 | 8 |
| 21 | 1970 | 3–2 | 60.0% | — | 1,505 | 0 | 0 | 1977 | 4–13 | 23.5% | — | 1,667 | 0 | 8 |
| 22 | 1971 | 5–13 | 27.8% | — | 1,471 | 0 | 0 | 1978 | 14–11 | 56.0% | — | 1,740 | 0 | 8 |
| 23 | 1972 | 6–16 | 27.3% | — | 1,490 | 0 | 0 | 1979 | 15–26 | 36.6% | — | 1,697 | 0 | 8 |
| 24 | 1973 | 11–11 | 50.0% | — | 1,607 | 0 | 1 | 1980 | 0–7 | 0.0% | — | 1,619 | 0 | 8 |
| 25 | 1974 | 26–17 | 60.5% | — | 1,744 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 1975 | 15–18 | 45.5% | — | 1,727 | 0 | 4 | 1982 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,599 | 0 | 8 |
| 27 | 1976 | 2–3 | 40.0% | — | 1,710 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 1977 | 2–6 | 25.0% | — | 1,658 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 1978 | 1–8 | 11.1% | — | 1,560 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 1979 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,566 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 1980 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,540 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |