H2H data updated: 2026-09-13 00:00 UTC

Richel Hogenkamp vs Natalie Proese

Compare the head-to-head record, career totals, season-by-season performance, and match log for Richel Hogenkamp vs Natalie Proese.

The Netherlands Age 34 Right-Handed 168 cm / 5'6"
H2H
0 0
0 main-draw meetings
Germany Age 35 Right-Handed

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Richel Hogenkamp #141 3-6 6-2 7-5 Natalie Proese Match data Apr 8, 2017 Q1 Q Biel International modern equivalent WTA 250 Hard

1 qualifying meeting shown in the table; qualifying is excluded from the H2H score. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Richel Hogenkamp #1,297 #94 654 1,581 14 28 33.3% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Natalie Proese 1,500 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Richel Hogenkamp Natalie Proese
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
20 2012 1–1 50.0% #197 1,513 0 0
21 2013 2–2 50.0% #213 1,524 0 0
22 2014 1–1 50.0% #138 1,530 0 0
23 2015 2–7 22.2% #132 1,495 0 0
24 2016 3–3 50.0% #133 1,548 0 0
25 2017 5–8 38.5% #106 1,537 0 0
26 2018 0–5 0.0% #167 1,514 0 0
27 2019 0–1 0.0% #195 1,478 0 0

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Richel Hogenkamp Natalie Proese
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
20 2012 1513 105.3 +0.72 -1.37 0.857 47.7% 40.0% -0.40 1–0 -0.17
21 2013 1525 101.1 -1.26 -0.60 0.947 49.5% +62 44.4% -0.45 1–0 +0.05
22 2014 1530 104.8 -1.97 -1.72 0.975 49.3% 50.0% 0.00 +0.01
23 2015 1496 108.3 -1.68 -2.17 0.778 45.4% -26 +70 26.3% -1.68 0–1 0–3 (0%) -0.22
24 2016 1549 112.0 -0.08 +0.20 1.052 51.5% 57.1% +0.50 0–2 -0.05
25 2017 1538 106.6 +0.40 -2.44 0.917 48.4% -45 +57 39.3% -0.64 1–1 0–2 -0.12
26 2018 1514 95.9 -2.74 -3.00 0.659 41.5% +56 9.1% -3.36 0–1 0–2 -0.20 2017 1486 98.9
27 2019 1479 104.6 +0.93 +3.09 0.867 46.4% 0.0% -2.00 0–1 -0.12
28 2020 1482
30 2022 1468 97.8
Career 1581 108.2 -0.69 -1.69 0.874 47.4% -39 +63 +57 35.9% -0.98 3–5 (38%) 0–8 (0%) 92.3 -1.95 1500 99.4

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.