H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Roberta Vinci vs Daniela Hantuchova H2H: 4-3

Roberta Vinci holds a 4–3 lead over Daniela Hantuchova in their WTA head-to-head. Across 7 main-draw meetings, Roberta Vinci leads 2–1 on hard courts, while Daniela Hantuchova leads 2–0 on grass. Most recently, Daniela Hantuchova won the 2014 Eastbourne third round 7-5 6-1.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Roberta Vinci
ITA Age 43 Right-Handed 163 cm / 5'4"
H2H
4 – 3
7 main draw meetings
Daniela Hantuchova
SVK Age 43 Right-Handed 181 cm / 5'11"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Jun 19, 2014* Eastbourne WTA 500 R32 Grass Daniela Hantuchova #35 7-5 6-1 Roberta Vinci #21 Match data
May 7, 2014* Madrid WTA 1000 R64 Clay Roberta Vinci #20 6-4 6-4 Daniela Hantuchova #30 Match data
Oct 29, 2012 Tournament of Champions WTA Finals RR Hard Roberta Vinci #16 6-1 6-2 Daniela Hantuchova #32 Match data
Jan 12, 2012* Sydney WTA 500 R32 Hard Daniela Hantuchova #21 7-5 6-2 Roberta Vinci #24 Match data
Mar 10, 2010* Indian Wells WTA 1000 R64 Hard Roberta Vinci #57 6-3 7-5 Daniela Hantuchova #22 Match data
Jun 18, 2009* 's-Hertogenbosch WTA 250 R32 Grass Daniela Hantuchova #33 7-6(2) 6-4 Roberta Vinci #53 Match data
Feb 1, 2007* Tokyo WTA 1000 R32 Carpet Roberta Vinci #119 6-4 6-4 Daniela Hantuchova #18 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Roberta Vinci #193 #7 3,615 1,923 320 287 52.7% 0 0 0 2 8 10
Daniela Hantuchova #317 #5 2,897 1,968 457 361 55.9% 0 2 0 1 4 7

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Roberta Vinci Daniela Hantuchova
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 — — — — — — — 1999 0–1 0.0% #197 1,494 0 0
17 — — — — — — — 2000 6–7 46.2% #108 1,551 0 0
18 2001 1–2 33.3% #168 1,485 0 0 2001 19–16 54.3% #38 1,710 0 0
19 2002 3–5 37.5% #184 1,478 0 0 2002 48–24 66.7% #8 1,919 0 1
20 2003 2–2 50.0% #119 1,503 0 0 2003 26–23 53.1% #19 1,753 0 1
21 2004 4–8 33.3% #116 1,507 0 0 2004 24–24 50.0% #31 1,714 0 1
22 2005 15–17 46.9% #41 1,623 0 0 2005 38–25 60.3% #19 1,877 0 1
23 2006 10–16 38.5% #85 1,576 0 0 2006 35–25 58.3% #17 1,860 0 1
24 2007 11–17 39.3% #73 1,561 0 1 2007 52–26 66.7% #9 1,930 0 3
25 2008 5–6 45.5% #84 1,585 0 1 2008 21–19 52.5% #21 1,756 0 3
26 2009 23–23 50.0% #63 1,663 0 2 2009 37–24 60.7% #24 1,807 0 3
27 2010 28–20 58.3% #38 1,817 0 3 2010 32–24 57.1% #30 1,780 0 3
28 2011 37–24 60.7% #23 1,774 0 6 2011 41–25 62.1% #24 1,790 0 4
29 2012 44–27 62.0% #16 1,834 0 7 2012 22–22 50.0% #32 1,686 0 5
30 2013 46–23 66.7% #14 1,853 0 9 2013 23–24 48.9% #33 1,683 0 6
31 2014 21–26 44.7% #47 1,712 0 9 2014 16–24 40.0% #62 1,577 0 6
32 2015 31–26 54.4% #15 1,765 0 9 2015 15–19 44.1% #83 1,574 0 7
33 2016 28–22 56.0% #18 1,733 0 10 2016 1–8 11.1% #228 1,514 0 7
34 2017 10–20 33.3% #116 1,610 0 10 2017 1–1 50.0% #317 1,524 0 7
35 2018 1–3 25.0% #193 1,628 0 10 — — — — — — —