H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC
Roberta Vinci vs Justine Henin H2H: 0-1
Justine Henin holds a 1–0 lead over Roberta Vinci in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Justine Henin leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Justine Henin won the 2010 's Hertogenbosch fourth round 6-3 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ITA
Age 43
Right-Handed
163 cm / 5'4"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
BEL
Age 44
Right-Handed
167 cm / 5'6"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 18, 2010* | 's Hertogenbosch | WTA 250 | R16 | Grass | Justine Henin | 6-3 6-3 | Roberta Vinci | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Roberta Vinci | #193 | #7 | 3,615 | 1,923 | 320 | 287 | 52.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 8 | 10 |
| Justine Henin | #13 | #1 | 7,626 | 2,384 | 442 | 102 | 81.2% | 7 | 10 | 2 | 18 | 5 | 42 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Roberta Vinci | Justine Henin | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1999 | 11–6 | 64.7% | #69 | 1,655 | 0 | 1 |
| 18 | 2001 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #168 | 1,485 | 0 | 0 | 2000 | 17–13 | 56.7% | #45 | 1,748 | 0 | 1 |
| 19 | 2002 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #184 | 1,478 | 0 | 0 | 2001 | 56–18 | 75.7% | #7 | 1,982 | 0 | 4 |
| 20 | 2003 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #119 | 1,503 | 0 | 0 | 2002 | 50–21 | 70.4% | #5 | 2,003 | 0 | 6 |
| 21 | 2004 | 4–8 | 33.3% | #116 | 1,507 | 0 | 0 | 2003 | 73–11 | 86.9% | #1 | 2,211 | 2 | 14 |
| 22 | 2005 | 15–17 | 46.9% | #41 | 1,623 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 30–4 | 88.2% | #8 | 2,201 | 3 | 18 |
| 23 | 2006 | 10–16 | 38.5% | #85 | 1,576 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 34–5 | 87.2% | #6 | 2,199 | 4 | 22 |
| 24 | 2007 | 11–17 | 39.3% | #73 | 1,561 | 0 | 1 | 2006 | 57–8 | 87.7% | #1 | 2,276 | 5 | 28 |
| 25 | 2008 | 5–6 | 45.5% | #84 | 1,585 | 0 | 1 | 2007 | 63–4 | 94.0% | #1 | 2,373 | 7 | 38 |
| 26 | 2009 | 23–23 | 50.0% | #63 | 1,663 | 0 | 2 | 2008 | 17–4 | 81.0% | #1 | 2,278 | 7 | 40 |
| 27 | 2010 | 28–20 | 58.3% | #38 | 1,817 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2011 | 37–24 | 60.7% | #23 | 1,774 | 0 | 6 | 2010 | 32–7 | 82.1% | #12 | 2,199 | 7 | 42 |
| 29 | 2012 | 44–27 | 62.0% | #16 | 1,834 | 0 | 7 | 2011 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #13 | 2,173 | 7 | 42 |
| 30 | 2013 | 46–23 | 66.7% | #14 | 1,853 | 0 | 9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2014 | 21–26 | 44.7% | #47 | 1,712 | 0 | 9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 2015 | 31–26 | 54.4% | #15 | 1,765 | 0 | 9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 2016 | 28–22 | 56.0% | #18 | 1,733 | 0 | 10 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 34 | 2017 | 10–20 | 33.3% | #116 | 1,610 | 0 | 10 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 35 | 2018 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #193 | 1,628 | 0 | 10 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |