H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC

Roberta Vinci vs Kaia Kanepi H2H: 3-1

Roberta Vinci holds a 3–1 lead over Kaia Kanepi in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Roberta Vinci leads 2–1 on clay and 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Roberta Vinci won the 2013 's Hertogenbosch third round 6-3 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Roberta Vinci
ITA Age 43 Right-Handed 163 cm / 5'4"
H2H
3 – 1
4 main draw meetings
Kaia Kanepi
EST Age 41 Right-Handed 179 cm / 5'10"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Jun 20, 2013* 's Hertogenbosch WTA 250 R32 Grass Roberta Vinci #11 6-3 6-3 Kaia Kanepi #46 Match data
May 5, 2012* Estoril WTA 250 SF Clay Kaia Kanepi #34 6-2 7-5 Roberta Vinci #23 Match data
May 14, 2008* Rome WTA 1000 R64 Clay Roberta Vinci #156 6-4 4-6 6-0 Kaia Kanepi #49 Match data
Jul 20, 2006* Palermo WTA 250 R32 Clay Roberta Vinci #87 7-5 6-4 Kaia Kanepi #84 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Roberta Vinci #193 #7 3,615 1,923 320 287 52.7% 0 0 0 2 8 10
Kaia Kanepi #1,322 #15 2,760 1,912 261 235 52.6% 0 0 0 2 2 4

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Roberta Vinci Kaia Kanepi
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 — — — — — — — 2001 0–1 0.0% #200 1,496 0 0
17 — — — — — — — 2002 2–3 40.0% #285 1,498 0 0
18 2001 1–2 33.3% #168 1,485 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 2002 3–5 37.5% #184 1,478 0 0 — — — — — — —
20 2003 2–2 50.0% #119 1,503 0 0 2005 3–2 60.0% #98 1,538 0 0
21 2004 4–8 33.3% #116 1,507 0 0 2006 14–16 46.7% #78 1,610 0 0
22 2005 15–17 46.9% #41 1,623 0 0 2007 13–17 43.3% #75 1,583 0 0
23 2006 10–16 38.5% #85 1,576 0 0 2008 28–20 58.3% #27 1,747 0 0
24 2007 11–17 39.3% #73 1,561 0 1 2009 15–21 41.7% #58 1,598 0 0
25 2008 5–6 45.5% #84 1,585 0 1 2010 29–17 63.0% #22 1,839 0 1
26 2009 23–23 50.0% #63 1,663 0 2 2011 19–17 52.8% #34 1,816 0 1
27 2010 28–20 58.3% #38 1,817 0 3 2012 25–9 73.5% #19 1,868 0 3
28 2011 37–24 60.7% #23 1,774 0 6 2013 21–10 67.7% #30 1,841 0 4
29 2012 44–27 62.0% #16 1,834 0 7 2014 17–19 47.2% #51 1,718 0 4
30 2013 46–23 66.7% #14 1,853 0 9 2015 8–12 40.0% #122 1,649 0 4
31 2014 21–26 44.7% #47 1,712 0 9 2016 0–1 0.0% #376 1,655 0 4
32 2015 31–26 54.4% #15 1,765 0 9 2017 4–2 66.7% #100 1,725 0 4
33 2016 28–22 56.0% #18 1,733 0 10 2018 11–11 50.0% #61 1,776 0 4
34 2017 10–20 33.3% #116 1,610 0 10 2019 9–10 47.4% #101 1,748 0 4
35 2018 1–3 25.0% #193 1,628 0 10 2020 2–3 40.0% #93 1,719 0 4
36 — — — — — — — 2021 11–12 47.8% #73 1,703 0 4
37 — — — — — — — 2022 24–16 60.0% #32 1,801 0 4
38 — — — — — — — 2023 6–16 27.3% #168 1,607 0 4