H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC

Roberta Vinci vs Maria Kirilenko H2H: 2-3

Maria Kirilenko holds a 3–2 lead over Roberta Vinci in their WTA head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on clay, while Maria Kirilenko leads 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Maria Kirilenko won the 2010 Australian Open third round 7-5 7-6(4).

ITA Age 43 Right-Handed 163 cm / 5'4"
H2H
2 3
5 main draw meetings
RUS Age 39 Right-Handed 174 cm / 5'9"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Jan 23, 2010* Australian Open Grand Slam R32 Hard Maria Kirilenko #58 7-5 7-6(4) Roberta Vinci #63 Match data
Apr 19, 2009* Barcelona WTA 250 F Clay Roberta Vinci #61 6-0 6-4 Maria Kirilenko #37 Match data
Jul 25, 2008* Portoroz WTA 250 R16 Hard Maria Kirilenko #19 6-1 6-2 Roberta Vinci #167 Match data
May 10, 2006* Berlin WTA 1000 R64 Clay Maria Kirilenko #24 6-4 6-3 Roberta Vinci #46 Match data
Jun 9, 2004* Birmingham WTA 250 R64 Grass Roberta Vinci #109 6-4 6-3 Maria Kirilenko #91 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Roberta Vinci #193 #7 3,615 1,923 320 287 52.7% 0 0 0 2 8 10
Maria Kirilenko #947 #10 3,471 1,910 282 228 55.3% 0 0 0 2 4 6

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Roberta Vinci Maria Kirilenko
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 2002 0–3 0.0% #373 1,479 0 0
16 2003 5–5 50.0% #124 1,522 0 0
17 2004 8–9 47.1% #107 1,575 0 0
18 2001 1–2 33.3% #168 1,485 0 0 2005 29–21 58.0% #25 1,741 0 1
19 2002 3–5 37.5% #184 1,478 0 0 2006 23–25 47.9% #30 1,656 0 1
20 2003 2–2 50.0% #119 1,503 0 0 2007 28–26 51.9% #25 1,739 0 2
21 2004 4–8 33.3% #116 1,507 0 0 2008 34–22 60.7% #29 1,722 0 5
22 2005 15–17 46.9% #41 1,623 0 0 2009 21–24 46.7% #62 1,719 0 5
23 2006 10–16 38.5% #85 1,576 0 0 2010 37–23 61.7% #20 1,827 0 5
24 2007 11–17 39.3% #73 1,561 0 1 2011 29–23 55.8% #28 1,816 0 5
25 2008 5–6 45.5% #84 1,585 0 1 2012 29–20 59.2% #14 1,775 0 5
26 2009 23–23 50.0% #63 1,663 0 2 2013 34–18 65.4% #19 1,786 0 6
27 2010 28–20 58.3% #38 1,817 0 3 2014 5–9 35.7% #187 1,698 0 6
28 2011 37–24 60.7% #23 1,774 0 6
29 2012 44–27 62.0% #16 1,834 0 7
30 2013 46–23 66.7% #14 1,853 0 9
31 2014 21–26 44.7% #47 1,712 0 9
32 2015 31–26 54.4% #15 1,765 0 9
33 2016 28–22 56.0% #18 1,733 0 10
34 2017 10–20 33.3% #116 1,610 0 10
35 2018 1–3 25.0% #193 1,628 0 10