H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC

Roberta Vinci vs Nadia Petrova H2H: 3-3

Roberta Vinci and Nadia Petrova are tied 3–3 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 6 main-draw meetings, Nadia Petrova leads 3–2 on hard courts, while Roberta Vinci leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Roberta Vinci won the 2013 Sydney third round 7-5 7-5.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Roberta Vinci
ITA Age 43 Right-Handed 163 cm / 5'4"
H2H
3 – 3
6 main draw meetings
Nadia Petrova
RUS Age 44 Right-Handed 178 cm / 5'10"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Jan 10, 2013* Sydney WTA 500 R32 Hard Roberta Vinci #16 7-5 7-5 Nadia Petrova #12 Match data
Nov 5, 2012* Tournament of Champions WTA Finals SF Hard Nadia Petrova #12 6-7(8) 6-1 6-4 Roberta Vinci #16 Match data
May 5, 2012* Estoril WTA 250 QF Clay Roberta Vinci #23 6-2 1-6 6-4 Nadia Petrova #35 Match data
Aug 17, 2011* Cincinnati WTA 1000 R64 Hard Nadia Petrova #27 6-3 0-6 6-4 Roberta Vinci #19 Match data
Feb 24, 2011* Doha WTA 500 R32 Hard Nadia Petrova #22 6-4 6-2 Roberta Vinci #36 Match data
Sep 29, 2010* Tokyo WTA 1000 R64 Hard Roberta Vinci #60 7-5 6-4 Nadia Petrova #17 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Roberta Vinci #193 #7 3,615 1,923 320 287 52.7% 0 0 0 2 8 10
Nadia Petrova #578 #3 3,882 2,077 441 276 61.5% 0 3 1 7 2 13

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Roberta Vinci Nadia Petrova
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 — — — — — — — 1998 2–2 50.0% #145 1,536 0 0
17 — — — — — — — 1999 3–5 37.5% #93 1,568 0 0
18 2001 1–2 33.3% #168 1,485 0 0 2000 12–15 44.4% #60 1,624 0 0
19 2002 3–5 37.5% #184 1,478 0 0 2001 20–21 48.8% #39 1,682 0 0
20 2003 2–2 50.0% #119 1,503 0 0 2002 7–5 58.3% #112 1,758 0 0
21 2004 4–8 33.3% #116 1,507 0 0 2003 36–20 64.3% #12 1,924 0 0
22 2005 15–17 46.9% #41 1,623 0 0 2004 39–24 61.9% #12 1,880 0 0
23 2006 10–16 38.5% #85 1,576 0 0 2005 56–25 69.1% #9 1,945 0 1
24 2007 11–17 39.3% #73 1,561 0 1 2006 48–19 71.6% #6 1,990 0 6
25 2008 5–6 45.5% #84 1,585 0 1 2007 37–18 67.3% #14 1,931 0 7
26 2009 23–23 50.0% #63 1,663 0 2 2008 47–24 66.2% #11 1,923 0 9
27 2010 28–20 58.3% #38 1,817 0 3 2009 30–21 58.8% #20 1,821 0 9
28 2011 37–24 60.7% #23 1,774 0 6 2010 32–20 61.5% #15 1,828 0 9
29 2012 44–27 62.0% #16 1,834 0 7 2011 25–21 54.3% #29 1,781 0 10
30 2013 46–23 66.7% #14 1,853 0 9 2012 37–18 67.3% #12 1,917 0 13
31 2014 21–26 44.7% #47 1,712 0 9 2013 9–13 40.9% #104 1,718 0 13
32 2015 31–26 54.4% #15 1,765 0 9 2014 1–5 16.7% #362 1,648 0 13
33 2016 28–22 56.0% #18 1,733 0 10 — — — — — — —
34 2017 10–20 33.3% #116 1,610 0 10 — — — — — — —
35 2018 1–3 25.0% #193 1,628 0 10 — — — — — — —