H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC

Roberta Vinci vs Serena Williams H2H: 1-4

Serena Williams holds a 4–1 lead over Roberta Vinci in their WTA head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, Serena Williams leads 2–1 on hard courts and 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Roberta Vinci won the 2015 US Open semifinal 2-6 6-4 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Roberta Vinci
ITA Age 43 Right-Handed 163 cm / 5'4"
H2H
1 – 4
5 main draw meetings
Serena Williams
USA Age 44 Right-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Sep 12, 2015* US Open Grand Slam SF Hard Roberta Vinci #43 2-6 6-4 6-4 Serena Williams #1 Match data
Aug 15, 2015* Toronto WTA 1000 QF Hard Serena Williams #1 6-4 6-3 Roberta Vinci #53 Match data
Jun 4, 2013* Roland Garros Grand Slam R16 Clay Serena Williams #1 6-1 6-3 Roberta Vinci #15 Match data
Mar 22, 2012* Miami WTA 1000 R32 Hard Serena Williams #11 6-2 6-1 Roberta Vinci #20 Match data
Jun 28, 2009* Wimbledon Grand Slam R32 Grass Serena Williams #2 6-3 6-4 Roberta Vinci #53 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Roberta Vinci #193 #7 3,615 1,923 320 287 52.7% 0 0 0 2 8 10
Serena Williams #320 #1 13,615 2,405 825 170 82.9% 23 23 5 17 3 71

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Roberta Vinci Serena Williams
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 — — — — — — — 1997 3–2 60.0% #101 1,582 0 0
16 — — — — — — — 1998 26–11 70.3% #20 1,895 0 0
17 — — — — — — — 1999 37–7 84.1% #4 2,170 1 4
18 2001 1–2 33.3% #168 1,485 0 0 2000 37–8 82.2% #6 2,174 1 7
19 2002 3–5 37.5% #184 1,478 0 0 2001 40–7 85.1% #6 2,259 1 10
20 2003 2–2 50.0% #119 1,503 0 0 2002 57–5 91.9% #1 2,348 4 18
21 2004 4–8 33.3% #116 1,507 0 0 2003 36–3 92.3% #3 2,369 6 22
22 2005 15–17 46.9% #41 1,623 0 0 2004 39–11 78.0% #7 2,192 6 24
23 2006 10–16 38.5% #85 1,576 0 0 2005 21–9 70.0% #11 2,028 7 25
24 2007 11–17 39.3% #73 1,561 0 1 2006 12–4 75.0% #95 2,016 7 25
25 2008 5–6 45.5% #84 1,585 0 1 2007 34–10 77.3% #7 2,058 8 27
26 2009 23–23 50.0% #63 1,663 0 2 2008 41–8 83.7% #2 2,109 9 31
27 2010 28–20 58.3% #38 1,817 0 3 2009 50–13 79.4% #1 2,106 11 34
28 2011 37–24 60.7% #23 1,774 0 6 2010 25–4 86.2% #4 2,149 13 36
29 2012 44–27 62.0% #16 1,834 0 7 2011 22–4 84.6% #12 2,155 13 38
30 2013 46–23 66.7% #14 1,853 0 9 2012 48–6 88.9% #3 2,239 15 44
31 2014 21–26 44.7% #47 1,712 0 9 2013 77–5 93.9% #1 2,345 17 55
32 2015 31–26 54.4% #15 1,765 0 9 2014 52–10 83.9% #1 2,209 18 62
33 2016 28–22 56.0% #18 1,733 0 10 2015 50–6 89.3% #1 2,197 21 67
34 2017 10–20 33.3% #116 1,610 0 10 2016 36–5 87.8% #2 2,177 22 69
35 2018 1–3 25.0% #193 1,628 0 10 2017 8–1 88.9% #22 2,172 23 70
36 — — — — — — — 2018 18–7 72.0% #16 2,078 23 70
37 — — — — — — — 2019 25–8 75.8% #10 2,052 23 70
38 — — — — — — — 2020 16–5 76.2% #11 1,991 23 71
39 — — — — — — — 2021 12–6 66.7% #41 1,950 23 71
40 — — — — — — — 2022 3–4 42.9% #320 1,891 23 71
44 — — — — — — — 2026 0–1 0.0% #320 — 23 71