H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Roberta Vinci vs Virginie Razzano H2H: 3-1

Roberta Vinci holds a 3–1 lead over Virginie Razzano in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Roberta Vinci leads 2–0 on clay and 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Roberta Vinci won the 2012 Birmingham third round 3-6 0-0 RET.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Roberta Vinci
ITA Age 43 Right-Handed 163 cm / 5'4"
H2H
3 – 1
4 main draw meetings
Virginie Razzano
FRA Age 43 Right-Handed 174 cm / 5'9"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Jun 14, 2012* Birmingham WTA 250 R32 Grass Roberta Vinci #20 3-6 0-0 (ret.) Virginie Razzano #90 Match data
Oct 6, 2011* Beijing WTA 1000 R32 Hard Virginie Razzano #110 7-6(7) 6-0 Roberta Vinci #20 Match data
Apr 30, 2011* Barcelona WTA 250 QF Clay Roberta Vinci #42 6-4 6-1 Virginie Razzano #102 Match data
May 25, 2010* Roland Garros Grand Slam R128 Clay Roberta Vinci #60 7-5 6-2 Virginie Razzano #46 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Roberta Vinci #193 #7 3,615 1,923 320 287 52.7% 0 0 0 2 8 10
Virginie Razzano #1,226 #16 2,420 1,876 200 216 48.1% 0 0 0 2 0 2

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Roberta Vinci Virginie Razzano
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 — — — — — — — 1999 0–1 0.0% #344 1,483 0 0
17 — — — — — — — 2000 3–4 42.9% #143 1,507 0 0
18 2001 1–2 33.3% #168 1,485 0 0 2001 10–12 45.5% #87 1,589 0 0
19 2002 3–5 37.5% #184 1,478 0 0 2002 11–12 47.8% #76 1,662 0 0
20 2003 2–2 50.0% #119 1,503 0 0 2003 15–20 42.9% #72 1,613 0 0
21 2004 4–8 33.3% #116 1,507 0 0 2004 7–8 46.7% #60 1,604 0 0
22 2005 15–17 46.9% #41 1,623 0 0 2005 16–22 42.1% #51 1,608 0 0
23 2006 10–16 38.5% #85 1,576 0 0 2006 10–18 35.7% #88 1,595 0 0
24 2007 11–17 39.3% #73 1,561 0 1 2007 34–20 63.0% #28 1,805 0 2
25 2008 5–6 45.5% #84 1,585 0 1 2008 14–20 41.2% #58 1,633 0 2
26 2009 23–23 50.0% #63 1,663 0 2 2009 31–20 60.8% #19 1,801 0 2
27 2010 28–20 58.3% #38 1,817 0 3 2010 9–15 37.5% #113 1,660 0 2
28 2011 37–24 60.7% #23 1,774 0 6 2011 13–13 50.0% #83 1,681 0 2
29 2012 44–27 62.0% #16 1,834 0 7 2012 5–9 35.7% #160 1,633 0 2
30 2013 46–23 66.7% #14 1,853 0 9 2013 9–8 52.9% #99 1,683 0 2
31 2014 21–26 44.7% #47 1,712 0 9 2014 4–8 33.3% #165 1,621 0 2
32 2015 31–26 54.4% #15 1,765 0 9 2015 4–2 66.7% #200 1,657 0 2
33 2016 28–22 56.0% #18 1,733 0 10 2016 5–4 55.6% #169 1,647 0 2
34 2017 10–20 33.3% #116 1,610 0 10 — — — — — — —
35 2018 1–3 25.0% #193 1,628 0 10 — — — — — — —