H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC
Robin White vs Elise Burgin H2H: 2-3
Elise Burgin holds a 3–2 lead over Robin White in their WTA head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, Elise Burgin leads 2–1 on grass and 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Elise Burgin won the 1992 Philadelphia third round 6-2 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 62
Right-Handed
172 cm / 5'8"
H2H
2
–
3
5 main draw meetings
USA
Age 64
Left-Handed
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 12, 1992* | Philadelphia | WTA 250 | R32 | Carpet | Elise Burgin | 6-2 6-2 | Robin White | Match data |
| Feb 18, 1988* | Oakland | WTA 250 | R32 | Hard | Robin White | 6-2 6-2 | Elise Burgin | Match data |
| Jun 18, 1986* | Eastbourne | WTA 250 | R64 | Grass | Robin White | 6-4 6-0 | Elise Burgin | Match data |
| Nov 15, 1985* | Brisbane | WTA 500 | R16 | Grass | Elise Burgin | 6-3 1-6 7-6 | Robin White | Match data |
| Jun 15, 1985* | Birmingham | WTA 250 | QF | Grass | Elise Burgin | 6-7 6-4 6-4 | Robin White | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Robin White | #565 | #15 | 37 | 1,878 | 142 | 158 | 47.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Elise Burgin | #768 | #27 | 20 | 1,845 | 132 | 165 | 44.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Robin White | Elise Burgin | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 1981 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,504 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1982 | 2–1 | 66.7% | — | 1,518 | 0 | 0 | 1980 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,475 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1983 | 1–4 | 20.0% | — | 1,493 | 0 | 0 | 1981 | 2–3 | 40.0% | — | 1,509 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1984 | 5–10 | 33.3% | #105 | 1,494 | 0 | 0 | 1982 | 7–10 | 41.2% | — | 1,585 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1985 | 25–18 | 58.1% | #32 | 1,764 | 0 | 1 | 1983 | 13–9 | 59.1% | — | 1,744 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1986 | 23–19 | 54.8% | #16 | 1,790 | 0 | 1 | 1984 | 9–15 | 37.5% | #51 | 1,715 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1987 | 11–14 | 44.0% | #56 | 1,742 | 0 | 1 | 1985 | 29–23 | 55.8% | #52 | 1,772 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1988 | 25–18 | 58.1% | #38 | 1,766 | 0 | 1 | 1986 | 25–22 | 53.2% | #40 | 1,776 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 1989 | 9–15 | 37.5% | #88 | 1,690 | 0 | 1 | 1987 | 17–21 | 44.7% | #66 | 1,709 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 1990 | 15–15 | 50.0% | #59 | 1,711 | 0 | 1 | 1988 | 5–12 | 29.4% | #108 | 1,632 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 1991 | 7–14 | 33.3% | #101 | 1,636 | 0 | 1 | 1989 | 16–19 | 45.7% | #62 | 1,701 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 1992 | 13–14 | 48.1% | #56 | 1,622 | 0 | 2 | 1990 | 7–19 | 26.9% | #149 | 1,569 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | 1993 | 4–12 | 25.0% | #119 | 1,568 | 0 | 2 | 1991 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #299 | 1,528 | 0 | 1 |
| 30 | 1994 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #281 | 1,539 | 0 | 2 | 1992 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #166 | 1,524 | 0 | 1 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1993 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #400 | 1,497 | 0 | 1 |