H2H data updated: 2026-07-20 02:15 UTC
Romina Oprandi vs Renata Voracova H2H: 0-1
Renata Voracova holds a 1–0 lead over Romina Oprandi in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Renata Voracova leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Renata Voracova won the 2011 Acapulco third round 6-4 4-6 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
SUI
Age 40
Right-Handed
172 cm / 5'8"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
CZE
Age 42
Right-Handed
176 cm / 5'9"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 24, 2011* | Acapulco | WTA 250 | R32 | Clay | Renata Voracova | 6-4 4-6 6-4 | Romina Oprandi | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Romina Oprandi | #895 | #32 | 1,490 | 1,694 | 54 | 88 | 38.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Renata Voracova | #1,041 | #74 | 848 | 1,523 | 24 | 54 | 30.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Romina Oprandi | Renata Voracova | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2002 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #128 | 1,462 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2005 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #187 | 1,487 | 0 | 0 | 2003 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #145 | 1,456 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2006 | 7–7 | 50.0% | #53 | 1,538 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2007 | 5–14 | 26.3% | #256 | 1,490 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2006 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #155 | 1,461 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2009 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #215 | 1,477 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 4–8 | 33.3% | #107 | 1,475 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2010 | 4–5 | 44.4% | #66 | 1,515 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 2–6 | 25.0% | #147 | 1,452 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2011 | 6–14 | 30.0% | #82 | 1,521 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #126 | 1,460 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2012 | 9–14 | 39.1% | #61 | 1,556 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 7–11 | 38.9% | #81 | 1,494 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2013 | 13–13 | 50.0% | #78 | 1,624 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 3–11 | 21.4% | #184 | 1,441 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2014 | 9–14 | 39.1% | #114 | 1,569 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2015 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #124 | 1,559 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #212 | 1,466 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 2016 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #397 | 1,485 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #169 | 1,442 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2015 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #253 | 1,420 | 0 | 0 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2017 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #844 | 1,396 | 0 | 0 |