H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Sachia Vickery vs Alla Kudryavtseva H2H: 1-0
Sachia Vickery holds a 1–0 lead over Alla Kudryavtseva in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Sachia Vickery leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Sachia Vickery won the 2015 Indian Wells first round 7-6(6) 7-6(6).
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 31
Right-Handed
163 cm / 5'4"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
RUS
Age 38
Right-Handed
178 cm / 5'10"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 10, 2015* | Indian Wells | WTA 1000 | R128 | Hard | Sachia Vickery | 7-6(6) 7-6(6) | Alla Kudryavtseva | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sachia Vickery | #417 | #73 | 833 | 1,699 | 38 | 56 | 40.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Alla Kudryavtseva | #841 | #56 | 1,056 | 1,670 | 85 | 138 | 38.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Sachia Vickery | Alla Kudryavtseva | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2005 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #220 | 1,485 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 2013 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #199 | 1,502 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 4–4 | 50.0% | #134 | 1,504 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2014 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #189 | 1,491 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 7–14 | 33.3% | #77 | 1,479 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2015 | 5–7 | 41.7% | #129 | 1,503 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 12–18 | 40.0% | #71 | 1,555 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2016 | 5–6 | 45.5% | #138 | 1,521 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 12–21 | 36.4% | #89 | 1,568 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2017 | 5–5 | 50.0% | #120 | 1,561 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 18–21 | 46.2% | #60 | 1,631 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 2018 | 9–10 | 47.4% | #101 | 1,627 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 15–23 | 39.5% | #103 | 1,569 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 2019 | 4–7 | 36.4% | #157 | 1,569 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 2–6 | 25.0% | #212 | 1,510 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 2020 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #158 | 1,586 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #170 | 1,506 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 2021 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #221 | 1,509 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 5–13 | 27.8% | #98 | 1,488 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 2022 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #184 | 1,527 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 2–8 | 20.0% | #175 | 1,452 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 2023 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #146 | 1,571 | 0 | 0 | 2016 | 5–3 | 62.5% | #142 | 1,614 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | 2024 | 2–6 | 25.0% | #201 | 1,575 | 0 | 0 | 2017 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #356 | 1,534 | 0 | 1 |