H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC

Samantha Stosur vs Ana Konjuh H2H: 0-1

Ana Konjuh holds a 1–0 lead over Samantha Stosur in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Ana Konjuh leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Ana Konjuh won the 2017 Dubai Tennis Championships second round 6-4 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Samantha Stosur
AUS Age 42 Right-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
0 – 1
1 main-draw meetings
Ana Konjuh
Croatia Age 28 Right-Handed 174 cm / 5'9"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Ana Konjuh #36 6-4 6-3 Samantha Stosur #19 Match data Feb 22, 2017* R32 Dubai Tennis Championships Premier 5 → modern equivalent WTA 1000 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Samantha Stosur #531 #4 6,195 2,072 459 345 57.1% 1 0 0 2 6 9
Ana Konjuh #647 #20 1,830 1,786 84 81 50.9% 0 0 0 0 1 1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Samantha Stosur Ana Konjuh
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 — — — — — — — 2014 8–6 57.1% #93 1,611 0 0
17 — — — — — — — 2015 11–9 55.0% #82 1,656 0 1
18 2002 0–2 0.0% #245 1,475 0 0 2016 19–14 57.6% #47 1,683 0 1
19 2003 2–4 33.3% #163 1,493 0 0 2017 22–18 55.0% #44 1,716 0 1
20 2004 17–17 50.0% #65 1,605 0 0 2018 1–3 25.0% #385 1,688 0 1
21 2005 18–22 45.0% #46 1,588 0 0 2019 0–1 0.0% #1282 1,645 0 1
22 2006 29–24 54.7% #29 1,747 0 0 — — — — — — —
23 2007 15–15 50.0% #46 1,724 0 0 2021 17–14 54.8% #67 1,690 0 1
24 2008 18–12 60.0% #52 1,754 0 0 2022 6–13 31.6% #108 1,647 0 1
25 2009 38–20 65.5% #13 1,887 0 1 2023 0–2 0.0% #407 1,587 0 1
26 2010 43–19 69.4% #6 1,931 0 2 — — — — — — —
27 2011 46–21 68.7% #6 1,967 1 3 2025 0–1 0.0% — 1,464 0 1
28 2012 40–24 62.5% #9 1,873 1 3 — — — — — — —
29 2013 40–22 64.5% #18 1,904 1 5 — — — — — — —
30 2014 32–22 59.3% #22 1,860 1 6 — — — — — — —
31 2015 34–22 60.7% #27 1,782 1 8 — — — — — — —
32 2016 30–23 56.6% #21 1,702 1 8 — — — — — — —
33 2017 22–19 53.7% #41 1,731 1 9 — — — — — — —
34 2018 17–24 41.5% #74 1,655 1 9 — — — — — — —
35 2019 15–17 46.9% #99 1,631 1 9 — — — — — — —
36 2020 1–3 25.0% #112 1,607 1 9 — — — — — — —
37 2021 1–10 9.1% #382 1,518 1 9 — — — — — — —
38 2022 1–3 25.0% #529 1,506 1 9 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Samantha Stosur Ana Konjuh
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2014 6 5 11 54.5% — — — — 2 1 3 66.7% — — — —
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2015 4 6 10 40.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 5 1 6 83.3% — — — —
18 2002 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2016 12 7 19 63.2% 6 4 10 60.0% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — —
19 2003 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2017 11 10 21 52.4% 3 4 7 42.9% 8 4 12 66.7% — — — —
20 2004 12 11 23 52.2% 3 4 7 42.9% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 2018 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
21 2005 12 13 25 48.0% 3 5 8 37.5% 2 3 5 40.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 2019 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 2006 18 15 33 54.5% 6 5 11 54.5% 2 2 4 50.0% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
23 2007 6 7 13 46.2% 6 5 11 54.5% 1 2 3 33.3% 2 1 3 66.7% 2021 9 8 17 52.9% 8 5 13 61.5% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
24 2008 11 7 18 61.1% 2 2 4 50.0% 5 3 8 62.5% — — — — 2022 6 9 15 40.0% 0 4 4 0.0% — — — — — — — —
25 2009 29 14 43 67.4% 6 4 10 60.0% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — 2023 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
26 2010 22 14 36 61.1% 18 3 21 85.7% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 2011 31 14 45 68.9% 12 5 17 70.6% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — 2025 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
28 2012 25 16 41 61.0% 14 5 19 73.7% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 2013 31 15 46 67.4% 6 5 11 54.5% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2014 23 14 37 62.2% 8 5 13 61.5% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2015 16 15 31 51.6% 16 5 21 76.2% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2016 11 15 26 42.3% 18 6 24 75.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2017 10 13 23 43.5% 12 6 18 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2018 3 13 16 18.8% 9 7 16 56.3% 5 4 9 55.6% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2019 9 11 20 45.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 2020 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
37 2021 1 7 8 12.5% — — — — 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
38 2022 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 274 224 498 55.0% 143 76 219 65.3% 36 41 77 46.8% 6 4 10 60.0% — 49 49 98 50.0% 19 21 40 47.5% 16 11 27 59.3% — — — —

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 648/803 of Samantha Stosur's and 156/165 of Ana Konjuh's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Samantha Stosur Ana Konjuh
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
16 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2014 14/14 5.4 5.8 53.2% 68.0% 43.3% 47.2% 39.0% 56.7% 40.4%
17 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2015 17/20 3.2 3.8 58.4% 65.2% 50.4% 56.8% 59.7% 58.7% 44.3%
18 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2016 28/33 3.9 5.1 53.6% 70.2% 45.2% 57.5% 47.1% 58.3% 43.6%
19 2003 1/6 6.0 5.0 49.4% 74.4% 35.0% 33.3% 33.3% 54.4% 38.2% 2017 40/40 3.6 4.7 57.7% 67.7% 44.6% 52.8% 52.3% 57.9% 43.3%
20 2004 5/34 2.2 2.4 49.6% 64.1% 45.0% 55.6% 30.1% 54.4% 34.4% 2018 4/4 3.8 3.0 62.5% 57.0% 35.7% 58.3% 24.2% 48.3% 40.7%
21 2005 9/40 4.7 4.4 56.5% 70.7% 48.7% 49.9% 46.1% 61.2% 40.8% 2019 1/1 3.0 8.0 42.6% 76.9% 42.9% 25.0% 0.0% 57.4% 27.9%
22 2006 36/53 4.1 2.3 61.8% 64.6% 47.1% 51.1% 39.0% 58.2% 38.5% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
23 2007 29/30 4.4 2.9 60.9% 66.0% 45.8% 59.0% 45.7% 57.6% 38.6% 2021 31/31 3.9 7.4 59.0% 62.8% 42.4% 54.1% 48.3% 54.4% 44.9%
24 2008 24/30 5.1 3.5 51.9% 71.1% 51.5% 59.2% 42.5% 61.4% 42.9% 2022 18/19 4.5 5.7 57.5% 64.9% 39.5% 51.1% 36.4% 53.9% 39.7%
25 2009 52/58 4.8 3.5 58.8% 68.8% 50.7% 61.2% 53.9% 61.1% 43.5% 2023 2/2 4.0 5.5 54.5% 67.3% 41.9% 67.7% 14.3% 55.7% 29.4%
26 2010 59/62 4.8 3.2 60.0% 70.7% 51.5% 57.8% 49.4% 63.0% 42.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
27 2011 59/67 3.2 2.1 63.5% 71.2% 53.3% 62.1% 48.8% 64.6% 42.2% 2025 1/1 0.0 8.0 42.6% 60.9% 48.4% 42.9% 33.3% 53.7% 36.4%
28 2012 57/64 3.8 3.2 64.6% 68.1% 51.2% 59.1% 44.5% 62.1% 43.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
29 2013 56/62 2.9 3.7 61.8% 68.1% 48.2% 61.2% 50.2% 60.3% 45.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
30 2014 51/54 4.4 2.8 61.7% 69.1% 51.1% 55.0% 50.9% 62.3% 42.9% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
31 2015 43/56 4.7 3.4 60.4% 69.7% 59.1% 58.6% 45.0% 65.5% 41.4% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
32 2016 40/53 3.5 4.8 60.5% 64.9% 45.1% 52.4% 46.1% 57.1% 40.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
33 2017 39/41 3.8 2.9 62.6% 67.3% 48.7% 54.2% 47.9% 60.4% 44.2% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
34 2018 40/42 4.1 3.3 60.6% 65.0% 47.7% 50.5% 45.7% 58.2% 37.6% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
35 2019 30/32 4.2 4.5 58.8% 65.9% 40.1% 52.8% 41.5% 55.3% 40.2% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
36 2020 4/4 2.3 3.8 69.9% 61.3% 34.5% 40.5% 31.5% 53.8% 36.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
37 2021 10/11 2.8 3.7 64.7% 59.4% 36.6% 53.1% 31.7% 51.3% 32.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
38 2022 4/4 3.8 4.3 59.3% 59.0% 38.3% 25.7% 34.2% 51.4% 38.4% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 648/805 4.0 3.3 60.9% 67.9% 49.4% 56.7% 46.6% 60.6% 41.7% — 156/165 3.9 5.4 56.8% 66.3% 43.9% 53.7% 46.7% 56.5% 42.7%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Samantha Stosur Ana Konjuh
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2014 1611 123.8 +0.22 -1.66 0.933 48.3% -10 — +44 47.4% -0.24 8–2 (80%) 1–1 — -0.76
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2015 1657 117.4 +0.42 +1.27 1.073 51.6% -67 -102 +82 52.3% +0.14 3–1 (75%) 1–1 — +0.20
18 2002 1476 94.7 — — — — — — — 20.0% -3.20 0–1 — — +0.06 2016 1684 123.8 +2.55 +0.13 1.047 51.1% +5 -132 -1 58.0% +0.39 5–4 (56%) 3–2 (60%) 103.1 +1.16
19 2003 1493 117.7 +0.87 +0.74 0.837 46.5% +24 — — 35.7% 0.00 1–1 0–5 (0%) — -0.19 2017 1716 135.7 +1.25 +0.51 1.028 50.5% -10 -157 +78 54.1% +0.13 9–6 (60%) 8–5 (62%) 104.6 -0.34
20 2004 1606 118.2 -0.27 -2.88 0.756 44.8% +5 -91 -21 51.3% -0.46 3–5 (38%) 7–2 (78%) 102.6 -1.27 2018 1688 106.6 -1.09 +0.29 0.789 44.9% — — — 33.3% -1.78 0–1 1–0 — -0.10
21 2005 1589 131.3 +2.67 -1.67 1.051 50.5% +30 -61 -33 44.9% -0.27 5–8 (38%) 6–10 (38%) 95.4 -0.78 2019 1646 96.7 -2.44 -2.78 0.654 42.6% — — — 0.0% -2.50 — — — 0.00
22 2006 1748 143.1 +1.45 -3.76 0.920 48.0% +2 -155 -135 52.2% +0.09 7–6 (54%) 3–8 (27%) 98.8 -0.70 2020 1622 97.3 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
23 2007 1724 135.6 +1.83 -2.92 0.911 48.6% -2 -43 -124 50.7% +0.19 5–4 (56%) 2–6 (25%) 98.6 -2.25 2021 1691 127.3 -0.62 +0.89 0.985 49.7% +1 -22 — 52.8% +0.03 6–4 (60%) 4–4 (50%) 102.0 -0.51
24 2008 1755 134.8 +4.41 +0.22 1.111 52.1% -11 -77 -81 58.1% +0.69 2–4 (33%) 2–2 (50%) 96.0 -0.47 2022 1647 126.6 -1.90 -1.85 0.861 46.8% +43 -54 — 36.4% -0.91 4–4 (50%) 2–2 (50%) 99.5 -1.32
25 2009 1888 154.7 +5.39 +0.57 1.119 52.5% -7 -129 -180 63.0% +0.94 10–11 (48%) 10–5 (67%) 104.0 -1.65 2023 1587 109.7 -2.35 -4.08 0.664 42.9% — — — 33.3% -1.67 0–1 1–0 — -0.11
26 2010 1932 159.5 +7.09 +0.23 1.156 52.9% -40 +78 -207 63.9% +1.12 14–6 (70%) 10–9 (53%) 107.5 -1.75 2024 1554 99.4 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 2011 1968 158.2 +8.42 -0.10 1.193 53.4% -20 +28 -223 64.2% +1.11 12–7 (63%) 8–6 (57%) 102.1 -0.95 2025 1465 98.2 +2.05 -0.61 0.785 44.2% — — — 0.0% -3.00 — — — -0.13
28 2012 1873 150.5 +5.95 +0.23 1.134 52.5% +7 +160 -197 58.8% +0.71 13–11 (54%) 8–14 (36%) 93.9 +1.71 2026 1446 — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 2013 1904 152.1 +4.49 +1.51 1.138 52.7% +14 +46 -214 63.6% +1.01 11–9 (55%) 6–4 (60%) 99.3 +1.39 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2014 1860 149.0 +5.95 +0.29 1.140 52.5% +6 +80 -205 59.0% +0.65 6–12 (33%) 7–6 (54%) 90.0 -1.01 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2015 1783 141.4 +5.95 +0.02 1.201 53.3% -26 +170 -121 55.7% +0.79 10–6 (63%) 3–8 (27%) 96.9 -0.45 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2016 1702 133.6 +1.07 -2.01 0.933 48.8% -49 +307 -57 50.9% -0.12 12–4 (75%) 7–8 (47%) 102.9 -0.09 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2017 1732 137.4 +3.91 +0.24 1.115 52.4% -86 +251 — 55.6% +0.41 6–11 (35%) 6–0 (100%) 99.3 +0.51 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2018 1655 126.0 +1.35 -4.20 0.900 48.1% -67 +228 +30 40.0% -0.64 3–4 (43%) 2–7 (22%) 93.2 -0.94 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2019 1631 116.9 -0.46 -2.06 0.900 47.9% -38 +150 +51 46.7% -0.59 6–5 (55%) 6–0 (100%) 106.9 +0.48 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 2020 1607 111.3 -1.57 -0.87 0.795 45.4% -26 — — 25.0% -2.25 — 2–0 — -0.08 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
37 2021 1518 99.9 -2.40 -3.51 0.673 42.9% -10 — +80 20.0% -2.40 0–3 (0%) — — +0.44 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
38 2022 1506 100.9 -2.15 -2.55 0.791 45.1% +8 — — 22.2% -1.55 1–0 0–3 (0%) — +0.30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 2072 148.5 +4.28 -0.68 1.059 51.2% -13 +101 -98 55.2% +0.39 127–118 (52%) 95–103 (48%) 95.8 -0.97 — 1786 128.7 +0.44 +0.04 0.982 49.6% -3 -88 +62 50.3% -0.09 35–23 (60%) 21–15 (58%) 109.5 -1.16

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.