H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Samantha Stosur vs Kaia Kanepi H2H: 2-2

Samantha Stosur and Kaia Kanepi are tied 2–2 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts, while Samantha Stosur leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Samantha Stosur won the 2015 Madrid third round 6-3 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Samantha Stosur
AUS Age 42 Right-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
2 – 2
4 main draw meetings
Kaia Kanepi
EST Age 41 Right-Handed 179 cm / 5'10"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
May 7, 2015* Madrid WTA 1000 R32 Clay Samantha Stosur #26 6-3 6-2 Kaia Kanepi #53 Match data
Aug 28, 2014* US Open Grand Slam R64 Hard Kaia Kanepi #50 3-6 6-3 7-6(8) Samantha Stosur #21 Match data
Oct 17, 2013* Moscow WTA 500 R32 Hard Samantha Stosur #19 6-3 6-1 Kaia Kanepi #29 Match data
Jun 23, 2010* Wimbledon Grand Slam R128 Grass Kaia Kanepi #80 6-4 6-4 Samantha Stosur #6 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Samantha Stosur #531 #4 6,195 2,068 451 335 57.4% 1 0 0 4 4 9
Kaia Kanepi #1,322 #15 2,760 1,912 261 235 52.6% 0 0 0 2 2 4

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Samantha Stosur Kaia Kanepi
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 — — — — — — — 2001 0–1 0.0% #200 1,496 0 0
17 — — — — — — — 2002 2–3 40.0% #285 1,498 0 0
18 2002 0–2 0.0% #245 1,475 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 2003 2–4 33.3% #163 1,492 0 0 — — — — — — —
20 2004 17–16 51.5% #65 1,609 0 0 2005 3–2 60.0% #98 1,538 0 0
21 2005 18–22 45.0% #46 1,607 0 0 2006 14–16 46.7% #78 1,610 0 0
22 2006 29–24 54.7% #29 1,749 0 0 2007 13–17 43.3% #75 1,583 0 0
23 2007 15–15 50.0% #46 1,723 0 0 2008 28–20 58.3% #27 1,747 0 0
24 2008 17–11 60.7% #52 1,746 0 0 2009 15–21 41.7% #58 1,598 0 0
25 2009 38–20 65.5% #13 1,885 0 1 2010 29–17 63.0% #22 1,839 0 1
26 2010 43–19 69.4% #6 1,927 0 2 2011 19–17 52.8% #34 1,816 0 1
27 2011 46–21 68.7% #6 1,977 1 3 2012 25–9 73.5% #19 1,868 0 3
28 2012 40–23 63.5% #9 1,883 1 3 2013 21–10 67.7% #30 1,841 0 4
29 2013 40–22 64.5% #18 1,902 1 5 2014 17–19 47.2% #51 1,718 0 4
30 2014 32–22 59.3% #22 1,883 1 6 2015 8–12 40.0% #122 1,649 0 4
31 2015 34–22 60.7% #27 1,789 1 8 2016 0–1 0.0% #376 1,655 0 4
32 2016 24–19 55.8% #21 1,716 1 8 2017 4–2 66.7% #100 1,725 0 4
33 2017 22–19 53.7% #41 1,734 1 9 2018 11–11 50.0% #61 1,776 0 4
34 2018 17–23 42.5% #74 1,663 1 9 2019 9–10 47.4% #101 1,748 0 4
35 2019 14–16 46.7% #99 1,631 1 9 2020 2–3 40.0% #93 1,719 0 4
36 2020 1–3 25.0% #112 1,607 1 9 2021 11–12 47.8% #73 1,703 0 4
37 2021 1–9 10.0% #382 1,522 1 9 2022 24–16 60.0% #32 1,801 0 4
38 2022 1–3 25.0% #529 1,511 1 9 2023 6–16 27.3% #168 1,607 0 4