H2H data updated: 2026-07-17 14:15 UTC

Samantha Stosur vs Monica Niculescu H2H: 7-0

Samantha Stosur holds a 7–0 lead over Monica Niculescu in their WTA head-to-head. Across 7 main-draw meetings, Samantha Stosur leads 7–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Samantha Stosur won the 2015 Beijing second round 6-3 6-2.

AUS Age 42 Right-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
7 0
7 main draw meetings
ROU Age 38 Right-Handed 168 cm / 5'6"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Oct 7, 2015* Beijing WTA 1000 R64 Hard Samantha Stosur #25 6-3 6-2 Monica Niculescu #46 Match data
Aug 8, 2015* Washington WTA 500 QF Hard Samantha Stosur #21 4-0 (ret.) Monica Niculescu #39 Match data
Jan 21, 2015* Australian Open Grand Slam R128 Hard Samantha Stosur #21 6-4 6-1 Monica Niculescu #49 Match data
Feb 14, 2013* Doha WTA 1000 R32 Hard Samantha Stosur #9 6-4 1-6 6-3 Monica Niculescu #60 Match data
Feb 18, 2012* Doha WTA 1000 QF Hard Samantha Stosur #5 6-2 2-6 6-3 Monica Niculescu #31 Match data
Aug 5, 2009* Los Angeles WTA 500 R64 Hard Samantha Stosur #19 6-1 6-2 Monica Niculescu #72 Match data
Jul 31, 2009* Stanford WTA 500 R16 Hard Samantha Stosur #20 6-1 7-5 Monica Niculescu #72 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Samantha Stosur #531 #4 6,195 2,068 451 335 57.4% 1 0 0 4 4 9
Monica Niculescu #958 #28 1,960 1,807 176 213 45.2% 0 0 0 0 3 3

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Samantha Stosur Monica Niculescu
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 2002 0–2 0.0% #245 1,475 0 0
19 2003 2–4 33.3% #163 1,492 0 0 2007 0–1 0.0% #152 1,490 0 0
20 2004 17–16 51.5% #65 1,609 0 0 2008 8–15 34.8% #48 1,542 0 0
21 2005 18–22 45.0% #46 1,607 0 0 2009 10–22 31.2% #103 1,522 0 0
22 2006 29–24 54.7% #29 1,749 0 0 2010 6–9 40.0% #82 1,573 0 0
23 2007 15–15 50.0% #46 1,723 0 0 2011 21–15 58.3% #30 1,755 0 0
24 2008 17–11 60.7% #52 1,746 0 0 2012 15–23 39.5% #58 1,639 0 0
25 2009 38–20 65.5% #13 1,885 0 1 2013 22–21 51.2% #59 1,637 0 1
26 2010 43–19 69.4% #6 1,927 0 2 2014 22–19 53.7% #46 1,687 0 2
27 2011 46–21 68.7% #6 1,977 1 3 2015 20–21 48.8% #39 1,677 0 2
28 2012 40–23 63.5% #9 1,883 1 3 2016 25–17 59.5% #38 1,782 0 3
29 2013 40–22 64.5% #18 1,902 1 5 2017 10–19 34.5% #77 1,618 0 3
30 2014 32–22 59.3% #22 1,883 1 6 2018 9–15 37.5% #99 1,588 0 3
31 2015 34–22 60.7% #27 1,789 1 8 2019 8–11 42.1% #118 1,627 0 3
32 2016 24–19 55.8% #21 1,716 1 8 2020 0–2 0.0% #144 1,579 0 3
33 2017 22–19 53.7% #41 1,734 1 9 2021 0–3 0.0% #274 1,514 0 3
34 2018 17–23 42.5% #74 1,663 1 9
35 2019 14–16 46.7% #99 1,631 1 9
36 2020 1–3 25.0% #112 1,607 1 9
37 2021 1–9 10.0% #382 1,522 1 9
38 2022 1–3 25.0% #529 1,511 1 9