H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 08:25 UTC

Samantha Stosur vs Na Li H2H: 6-1

Samantha Stosur holds a 6–1 lead over Na Li in their WTA head-to-head. Across 7 main-draw meetings, Samantha Stosur leads 2–1 on clay and 3–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Na Li won the 2014 Rome fourth round 6-3 6-1.

AUS Age 42 Right-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
6 1
7 main draw meetings
CHN Age 44 Right-Handed 172 cm / 5'8"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
May 16, 2014* Rome WTA 1000 R16 Clay Na Li #2 6-3 6-1 Samantha Stosur #18 Match data
Oct 24, 2011 WTA Championships WTA Finals RR Hard Samantha Stosur #7 6-1 6-0 Na Li #5 Match data
Aug 19, 2011* Cincinnati WTA 1000 R16 Hard Samantha Stosur #10 6-4 3-6 6-4 Na Li #5 Match data
Aug 8, 2011 Toronto WTA 1000 R16 Hard Samantha Stosur #11 6-2 6-4 Na Li #6 Match data
May 14, 2011* Rome WTA 1000 SF Clay Samantha Stosur #7 7-6(6) 6-0 Na Li #6 Match data
May 1, 2010* Stuttgart WTA 500 QF Clay Samantha Stosur #10 6-3 6-3 Na Li #16 Match data
Feb 2, 2007* Tokyo WTA 1000 R16 Carpet Samantha Stosur #27 6-2 6-4 Na Li #17 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Samantha Stosur #531 #4 6,195 2,068 451 335 57.4% 1 0 0 4 4 9
Na Li #9 #2 7,585 2,124 334 155 68.3% 2 1 0 2 4 9

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Samantha Stosur Na Li
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 2002 0–2 0.0% #245 1,475 0 0 2000 1–2 33.3% #136 1,499 0 0
19 2003 2–4 33.3% #163 1,492 0 0 2001 0–1 0.0% #302 1,483 0 0
20 2004 17–16 51.5% #65 1,609 0 0
21 2005 18–22 45.0% #46 1,607 0 0
22 2006 29–24 54.7% #29 1,749 0 0 2004 6–1 85.7% #78 1,601 0 1
23 2007 15–15 50.0% #46 1,723 0 0 2005 23–14 62.2% #56 1,711 0 1
24 2008 17–11 60.7% #52 1,746 0 0 2006 36–22 62.1% #21 1,801 0 1
25 2009 38–20 65.5% #13 1,885 0 1 2007 22–12 64.7% #29 1,814 0 1
26 2010 43–19 69.4% #6 1,927 0 2 2008 24–12 66.7% #23 1,843 0 2
27 2011 46–21 68.7% #6 1,977 1 3 2009 35–17 67.3% #15 1,914 0 2
28 2012 40–23 63.5% #9 1,883 1 3 2010 36–20 64.3% #11 1,844 0 3
29 2013 40–22 64.5% #18 1,902 1 5 2011 33–17 66.0% #5 1,868 1 5
30 2014 32–22 59.3% #22 1,883 1 6 2012 43–16 72.9% #7 2,016 1 6
31 2015 34–22 60.7% #27 1,789 1 8 2013 46–14 76.7% #3 2,077 1 7
32 2016 24–19 55.8% #21 1,716 1 8 2014 29–7 80.6% #9 2,031 2 9
33 2017 22–19 53.7% #41 1,734 1 9
34 2018 17–23 42.5% #74 1,663 1 9
35 2019 14–16 46.7% #99 1,631 1 9
36 2020 1–3 25.0% #112 1,607 1 9
37 2021 1–9 10.0% #382 1,522 1 9
38 2022 1–3 25.0% #529 1,511 1 9