H2H data updated: 2026-07-20 08:10 UTC
Samantha Stosur vs Nadia Petrova H2H: 4-6
Nadia Petrova holds a 6–4 lead over Samantha Stosur in their WTA head-to-head. Across 10 main-draw meetings, Nadia Petrova leads 5–1 on hard courts, while Samantha Stosur leads 2–1 on grass. Most recently, Samantha Stosur won the 2013 Eastbourne third round 6-2 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
AUS
Age 42
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
4
–
6
10 main draw meetings
RUS
Age 44
Right-Handed
178 cm / 5'10"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 20, 2013* | Eastbourne | WTA 500 | R32 | Grass | Samantha Stosur | 6-2 6-3 | Nadia Petrova | Match data |
| Sep 29, 2012* | Tokyo | WTA 1000 | SF | Hard | Nadia Petrova | 6-4 6-2 | Samantha Stosur | Match data |
| Jun 2, 2012* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R32 | Clay | Samantha Stosur | 6-3 6-3 | Nadia Petrova | Match data |
| Mar 8, 2012* | Indian Wells | WTA 1000 | R32 | Hard | Nadia Petrova | 6-1 6-7(6) 7-6(5) | Samantha Stosur | Match data |
| Sep 4, 2011* | US Open | Grand Slam | R32 | Hard | Samantha Stosur | 7-6(5) 6-7(5) 7-5 | Nadia Petrova | Match data |
| Jun 16, 2011* | Eastbourne | WTA 500 | R32 | Grass | Samantha Stosur | 6-1 6-4 | Nadia Petrova | Match data |
| Aug 28, 2010* | New Haven | WTA 500 | QF | Hard | Nadia Petrova | 6-2 6-1 | Samantha Stosur | Match data |
| Jun 21, 2008* | Eastbourne | WTA 500 | SF | Grass | Nadia Petrova | 6-3 6-3 | Samantha Stosur | Match data |
| Oct 28, 2006* | Linz | WTA 500 | QF | Hard | Nadia Petrova | 6-1 6-3 | Samantha Stosur | Match data |
| Sep 2, 2004* | US Open | Grand Slam | R64 | Hard | Nadia Petrova | 6-2 6-2 | Samantha Stosur | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Samantha Stosur | #531 | #4 | 6,195 | 2,068 | 451 | 335 | 57.4% | 1 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 | 9 |
| Nadia Petrova | #578 | #3 | 3,882 | 2,077 | 441 | 276 | 61.5% | 0 | 3 | 1 | 7 | 2 | 13 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Samantha Stosur | Nadia Petrova | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1998 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #145 | 1,536 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1999 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #93 | 1,568 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 2002 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #245 | 1,475 | 0 | 0 | 2000 | 12–15 | 44.4% | #60 | 1,624 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2003 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #163 | 1,492 | 0 | 0 | 2001 | 20–21 | 48.8% | #39 | 1,682 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2004 | 17–16 | 51.5% | #65 | 1,609 | 0 | 0 | 2002 | 7–5 | 58.3% | #112 | 1,758 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2005 | 18–22 | 45.0% | #46 | 1,607 | 0 | 0 | 2003 | 36–20 | 64.3% | #12 | 1,924 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2006 | 29–24 | 54.7% | #29 | 1,749 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 39–24 | 61.9% | #12 | 1,880 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2007 | 15–15 | 50.0% | #46 | 1,723 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 56–25 | 69.1% | #9 | 1,945 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 2008 | 17–11 | 60.7% | #52 | 1,746 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 48–19 | 71.6% | #6 | 1,990 | 0 | 6 |
| 25 | 2009 | 38–20 | 65.5% | #13 | 1,885 | 0 | 1 | 2007 | 37–18 | 67.3% | #14 | 1,931 | 0 | 7 |
| 26 | 2010 | 43–19 | 69.4% | #6 | 1,927 | 0 | 2 | 2008 | 47–24 | 66.2% | #11 | 1,923 | 0 | 9 |
| 27 | 2011 | 46–21 | 68.7% | #6 | 1,977 | 1 | 3 | 2009 | 30–21 | 58.8% | #20 | 1,821 | 0 | 9 |
| 28 | 2012 | 40–23 | 63.5% | #9 | 1,883 | 1 | 3 | 2010 | 32–20 | 61.5% | #15 | 1,828 | 0 | 9 |
| 29 | 2013 | 40–22 | 64.5% | #18 | 1,902 | 1 | 5 | 2011 | 25–21 | 54.3% | #29 | 1,781 | 0 | 10 |
| 30 | 2014 | 32–22 | 59.3% | #22 | 1,883 | 1 | 6 | 2012 | 37–18 | 67.3% | #12 | 1,917 | 0 | 13 |
| 31 | 2015 | 34–22 | 60.7% | #27 | 1,789 | 1 | 8 | 2013 | 9–13 | 40.9% | #104 | 1,718 | 0 | 13 |
| 32 | 2016 | 24–19 | 55.8% | #21 | 1,716 | 1 | 8 | 2014 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #362 | 1,648 | 0 | 13 |
| 33 | 2017 | 22–19 | 53.7% | #41 | 1,734 | 1 | 9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 34 | 2018 | 17–23 | 42.5% | #74 | 1,663 | 1 | 9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 35 | 2019 | 14–16 | 46.7% | #99 | 1,631 | 1 | 9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 36 | 2020 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #112 | 1,607 | 1 | 9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 37 | 2021 | 1–9 | 10.0% | #382 | 1,522 | 1 | 9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 38 | 2022 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #529 | 1,511 | 1 | 9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |