H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC

Samantha Stosur vs Petra Kvitova H2H: 1-6

Petra Kvitova holds a 6–1 lead over Samantha Stosur in their WTA head-to-head. Across 7 main-draw meetings, Petra Kvitova leads 5–0 on hard courts, while they are tied 1–1 on clay. Most recently, Petra Kvitova won the 2014 Beijing semifinal 6-3 5-7 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Samantha Stosur
AUS Age 42 Right-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
1 – 6
7 main draw meetings
Petra Kvitova
CZE Age 36 Left-Handed 182 cm / 6'0"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Oct 4, 2014* Beijing WTA 1000 SF Hard Petra Kvitova #3 6-3 5-7 6-2 Samantha Stosur #21 Match data
Aug 23, 2014* New Haven WTA 500 SF Hard Petra Kvitova #4 6-3 6-1 Samantha Stosur #25 Match data
Aug 5, 2013 Toronto WTA 1000 R16 Hard Petra Kvitova #7 6-3 6-3 Samantha Stosur #11 Match data
May 17, 2013* Rome WTA 1000 R16 Clay Samantha Stosur #10 7-5 2-6 6-1 Petra Kvitova #8 Match data
Oct 31, 2011* WTA Championships WTA Finals SF Hard Petra Kvitova #2 5-7 6-3 6-3 Samantha Stosur #6 Match data
Jan 23, 2011* Australian Open Grand Slam R32 Hard Petra Kvitova #28 7-6(5) 6-3 Samantha Stosur #6 Match data
May 28, 2008* Roland Garros Grand Slam R64 Clay Petra Kvitova #87 6-2 6-1 Samantha Stosur #149 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Samantha Stosur #531 #4 6,195 2,068 451 335 57.4% 1 0 0 4 4 9
Petra Kvitova #450 #2 7,690 2,073 501 258 66.0% 2 10 2 14 3 31

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Samantha Stosur Petra Kvitova
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 — — — — — — — 2007 0–1 0.0% #150 1,485 0 0
18 2002 0–2 0.0% #245 1,475 0 0 2008 13–14 48.1% #50 1,607 0 0
19 2003 2–4 33.3% #163 1,492 0 0 2009 18–16 52.9% #61 1,700 0 1
20 2004 17–16 51.5% #65 1,609 0 0 2010 17–20 45.9% #34 1,699 0 1
21 2005 18–22 45.0% #46 1,607 0 0 2011 50–11 82.0% #2 2,058 1 7
22 2006 29–24 54.7% #29 1,749 0 0 2012 38–15 71.7% #8 1,961 1 9
23 2007 15–15 50.0% #46 1,723 0 0 2013 49–22 69.0% #6 1,966 1 11
24 2008 17–11 60.7% #52 1,746 0 0 2014 41–17 70.7% #4 1,989 2 14
25 2009 38–20 65.5% #13 1,885 0 1 2015 35–16 68.6% #6 1,907 2 17
26 2010 43–19 69.4% #6 1,927 0 2 2016 41–19 68.3% #11 1,966 2 19
27 2011 46–21 68.7% #6 1,977 1 3 2017 18–10 64.3% #29 1,894 2 20
28 2012 40–23 63.5% #9 1,883 1 3 2018 42–17 71.2% #7 1,887 2 25
29 2013 40–22 64.5% #18 1,902 1 5 2019 33–16 67.3% #7 1,897 2 27
30 2014 32–22 59.3% #22 1,883 1 6 2020 20–7 74.1% #8 1,947 2 27
31 2015 34–22 60.7% #27 1,789 1 8 2021 28–17 62.2% #17 1,881 2 28
32 2016 24–19 55.8% #21 1,716 1 8 2022 28–19 59.6% #16 1,920 2 29
33 2017 22–19 53.7% #41 1,734 1 9 2023 29–13 69.0% #14 1,931 2 31
34 2018 17–23 42.5% #74 1,663 1 9 — — — — — — —
35 2019 14–16 46.7% #99 1,631 1 9 2025 1–8 11.1% — 1,773 2 31
36 2020 1–3 25.0% #112 1,607 1 9 — — — — — — —
37 2021 1–9 10.0% #382 1,522 1 9 — — — — — — —
38 2022 1–3 25.0% #529 1,511 1 9 — — — — — — —