H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC

Samantha Stosur vs Virginie Razzano H2H: 6-0

Samantha Stosur holds a 6–0 lead over Virginie Razzano in their WTA head-to-head. Across 6 main-draw meetings, Samantha Stosur leads 5–0 on hard courts and 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Samantha Stosur won the 2013 Carlsbad semifinal 7-6(2) 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Samantha Stosur
AUS Age 42 Right-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
6 – 0
6 main draw meetings
Virginie Razzano
FRA Age 43 Right-Handed 174 cm / 5'9"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Aug 3, 2013* Carlsbad WTA 500 SF Hard Samantha Stosur #13 7-6(2) 6-3 Virginie Razzano #131 Match data
Oct 12, 2012* Osaka WTA 250 R16 Hard Samantha Stosur #9 1-6 6-2 6-4 Virginie Razzano #170 Match data
Mar 25, 2010* Miami WTA 1000 R32 Hard Samantha Stosur #10 4-6 7-5 6-1 Virginie Razzano #39 Match data
Aug 21, 2009* Toronto WTA 1000 R16 Hard Samantha Stosur #17 6-3 6-1 Virginie Razzano #18 Match data
Jun 2, 2009* Roland Garros Grand Slam R16 Clay Samantha Stosur #32 6-1 6-2 Virginie Razzano #36 Match data
Sep 1, 2004* US Open Grand Slam R128 Hard Samantha Stosur #94 7-5 6-4 Virginie Razzano #107 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Samantha Stosur #531 #4 6,195 2,068 451 335 57.4% 1 0 0 4 4 9
Virginie Razzano #1,226 #16 2,420 1,876 200 216 48.1% 0 0 0 2 0 2

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Samantha Stosur Virginie Razzano
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 — — — — — — — 1999 0–1 0.0% #344 1,483 0 0
17 — — — — — — — 2000 3–4 42.9% #143 1,507 0 0
18 2002 0–2 0.0% #245 1,475 0 0 2001 10–12 45.5% #87 1,589 0 0
19 2003 2–4 33.3% #163 1,492 0 0 2002 11–12 47.8% #76 1,662 0 0
20 2004 17–16 51.5% #65 1,609 0 0 2003 15–20 42.9% #72 1,613 0 0
21 2005 18–22 45.0% #46 1,607 0 0 2004 7–8 46.7% #60 1,604 0 0
22 2006 29–24 54.7% #29 1,749 0 0 2005 16–22 42.1% #51 1,608 0 0
23 2007 15–15 50.0% #46 1,723 0 0 2006 10–18 35.7% #88 1,595 0 0
24 2008 17–11 60.7% #52 1,746 0 0 2007 34–20 63.0% #28 1,805 0 2
25 2009 38–20 65.5% #13 1,885 0 1 2008 14–20 41.2% #58 1,633 0 2
26 2010 43–19 69.4% #6 1,927 0 2 2009 31–20 60.8% #19 1,801 0 2
27 2011 46–21 68.7% #6 1,977 1 3 2010 9–15 37.5% #113 1,660 0 2
28 2012 40–23 63.5% #9 1,883 1 3 2011 13–13 50.0% #83 1,681 0 2
29 2013 40–22 64.5% #18 1,902 1 5 2012 5–9 35.7% #160 1,633 0 2
30 2014 32–22 59.3% #22 1,883 1 6 2013 9–8 52.9% #99 1,683 0 2
31 2015 34–22 60.7% #27 1,789 1 8 2014 4–8 33.3% #165 1,621 0 2
32 2016 24–19 55.8% #21 1,716 1 8 2015 4–2 66.7% #200 1,657 0 2
33 2017 22–19 53.7% #41 1,734 1 9 2016 5–4 55.6% #169 1,647 0 2
34 2018 17–23 42.5% #74 1,663 1 9 — — — — — — —
35 2019 14–16 46.7% #99 1,631 1 9 — — — — — — —
36 2020 1–3 25.0% #112 1,607 1 9 — — — — — — —
37 2021 1–9 10.0% #382 1,522 1 9 — — — — — — —
38 2022 1–3 25.0% #529 1,511 1 9 — — — — — — —