H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Samantha Stosur vs Yuliana Fedak H2H: 2-0
Samantha Stosur holds a 2–0 lead over Yuliana Fedak in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Samantha Stosur leads 1–0 on clay and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Samantha Stosur won the 2006 Indian Wells first round 3-6 6-3 6-0.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
AUS
Age 42
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
2
–
0
2 main draw meetings
UKR
Age 43
Right-Handed
166 cm / 5'5"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 7, 2006* | Indian Wells | WTA 1000 | R128 | Hard | Samantha Stosur | 3-6 6-3 6-0 | Yuliana Fedak | Match data |
| May 11, 2005* | Rome | WTA 1000 | R64 | Clay | Samantha Stosur | 6-3 6-3 | Yuliana Fedak | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Samantha Stosur | #531 | #4 | 6,195 | 2,068 | 451 | 335 | 57.4% | 1 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 | 9 |
| Yuliana Fedak | #904 | #63 | 498 | 1,584 | 27 | 68 | 28.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Samantha Stosur | Yuliana Fedak | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 2002 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #245 | 1,475 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2003 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #163 | 1,492 | 0 | 0 | 2002 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #195 | 1,472 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2004 | 17–16 | 51.5% | #65 | 1,609 | 0 | 0 | 2003 | 3–2 | 60.0% | #209 | 1,498 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2005 | 18–22 | 45.0% | #46 | 1,607 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #82 | 1,527 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2006 | 29–24 | 54.7% | #29 | 1,749 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 5–18 | 21.7% | #114 | 1,449 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2007 | 15–15 | 50.0% | #46 | 1,723 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 7–13 | 35.0% | #80 | 1,460 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2008 | 17–11 | 60.7% | #52 | 1,746 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 6–14 | 30.0% | #123 | 1,509 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2009 | 38–20 | 65.5% | #13 | 1,885 | 0 | 1 | 2008 | 2–9 | 18.2% | #154 | 1,471 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2010 | 43–19 | 69.4% | #6 | 1,927 | 0 | 2 | 2009 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #167 | 1,449 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2011 | 46–21 | 68.7% | #6 | 1,977 | 1 | 3 | 2010 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #256 | 1,426 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2012 | 40–23 | 63.5% | #9 | 1,883 | 1 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2013 | 40–22 | 64.5% | #18 | 1,902 | 1 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2014 | 32–22 | 59.3% | #22 | 1,883 | 1 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2015 | 34–22 | 60.7% | #27 | 1,789 | 1 | 8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 2016 | 24–19 | 55.8% | #21 | 1,716 | 1 | 8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 2017 | 22–19 | 53.7% | #41 | 1,734 | 1 | 9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 34 | 2018 | 17–23 | 42.5% | #74 | 1,663 | 1 | 9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 35 | 2019 | 14–16 | 46.7% | #99 | 1,631 | 1 | 9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 36 | 2020 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #112 | 1,607 | 1 | 9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 37 | 2021 | 1–9 | 10.0% | #382 | 1,522 | 1 | 9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 38 | 2022 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #529 | 1,511 | 1 | 9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |