H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Sania Mirza vs Maria Kirilenko H2H: 2-1
Sania Mirza holds a 2–1 lead over Maria Kirilenko in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Sania Mirza leads 2–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Maria Kirilenko won the 2011 Miami second round 5-7 6-3 6-0.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
IND
Age 39
Right-Handed
173 cm / 5'8"
H2H
2
–
1
3 main draw meetings
RUS
Age 39
Right-Handed
174 cm / 5'9"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 23, 2011* | Miami | WTA 1000 | R64 | Hard | Maria Kirilenko | 5-7 6-3 6-0 | Sania Mirza | Match data |
| Jan 11, 2007* | Hobart | WTA 250 | R32 | Hard | Sania Mirza | 6-4 6-4 | Maria Kirilenko | Match data |
| Feb 12, 2005* | Hyderabad | WTA 250 | SF | Hard | Sania Mirza | 6-4 7-6(4) | Maria Kirilenko | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sania Mirza | #707 | #27 | 1,148 | 1,819 | 121 | 117 | 50.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Maria Kirilenko | #947 | #10 | 3,471 | 1,910 | 282 | 228 | 55.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 4 | 6 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Sania Mirza | Maria Kirilenko | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2002 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #373 | 1,479 | 0 | 0 |
| 16 | 2003 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #462 | 1,485 | 0 | 0 | 2003 | 5–5 | 50.0% | #124 | 1,522 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | 2004 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #169 | 1,468 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 8–9 | 47.1% | #107 | 1,575 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 2005 | 27–16 | 62.8% | #34 | 1,677 | 0 | 1 | 2005 | 29–21 | 58.0% | #25 | 1,741 | 0 | 1 |
| 19 | 2006 | 20–24 | 45.5% | #65 | 1,651 | 0 | 1 | 2006 | 23–25 | 47.9% | #30 | 1,656 | 0 | 1 |
| 20 | 2007 | 30–20 | 60.0% | #31 | 1,750 | 0 | 1 | 2007 | 28–26 | 51.9% | #25 | 1,739 | 0 | 2 |
| 21 | 2008 | 11–11 | 50.0% | #101 | 1,661 | 0 | 1 | 2008 | 34–22 | 60.7% | #29 | 1,722 | 0 | 5 |
| 22 | 2009 | 17–13 | 56.7% | #57 | 1,724 | 0 | 1 | 2009 | 21–24 | 46.7% | #62 | 1,719 | 0 | 5 |
| 23 | 2010 | 5–10 | 33.3% | #141 | 1,607 | 0 | 1 | 2010 | 37–23 | 61.7% | #20 | 1,827 | 0 | 5 |
| 24 | 2011 | 8–15 | 34.8% | #104 | 1,557 | 0 | 1 | 2011 | 29–23 | 55.8% | #28 | 1,816 | 0 | 5 |
| 25 | 2012 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #278 | 1,541 | 0 | 1 | 2012 | 29–20 | 59.2% | #14 | 1,775 | 0 | 5 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2013 | 34–18 | 65.4% | #19 | 1,786 | 0 | 6 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2014 | 5–9 | 35.7% | #187 | 1,698 | 0 | 6 |