H2H data updated: 2026-09-13 00:00 UTC
Compare the head-to-head record, career totals, season-by-season performance, and match log for Sara Bejlek vs Chloe Paquet.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
| Player | Score | Player | Match Data | Date | Round | Tournament | Category | Surface |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sara Bejlek | 6-2 6-2 | Chloe Paquet | Match data | Feb 1, 2026 | Q2 | Abu Dhabi Open | WTA 500 | Hard |
1 qualifying meeting shown in the table; qualifying is excluded from the H2H score. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories | Finals | 500 including documented historical predecessor categories | 250 including documented historical predecessor categories | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sara Bejlek | #30 | #29 | 1,652 | 1,884 | 26 | 27 | 49.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Chloe Paquet | #297 | #96 | 746 | 1,636 | 17 | 45 | 27.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Sara Bejlek | Chloe Paquet | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 2022 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #181 | 1,460 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 2023 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #129 | 1,561 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2024 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #161 | 1,663 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2025 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #92 | 1,785 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2026 | 20–16 | 55.6% | #30 | 1,854 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2016 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #307 | 1,512 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2017 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #268 | 1,539 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2018 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #222 | 1,527 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2019 | 6–8 | 42.9% | #169 | 1,613 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2020 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #187 | 1,521 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #119 | 1,458 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2022 | 2–11 | 15.4% | #164 | 1,426 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2023 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #157 | 1,569 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2024 | 7–6 | 53.8% | #123 | 1,547 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2025 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #243 | 1,522 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2026 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #297 | 1,529 | 0 | 0 |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.
| Age | Sara Bejlek | Chloe Paquet | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | |
| 14 | 2020 | 1483 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | 2022 | 1460 | 103.3 | -0.63 | +4.78 | 0.553 | 40.0% | — | — | — | 0.0% | -4.00 | — | — | — | -0.09 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 2023 | 1561 | 99.6 | -2.36 | -0.77 | 0.561 | 38.0% | — | — | — | 0.0% | -4.25 | — | — | — | +0.05 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2024 | 1664 | 121.5 | -1.97 | +1.26 | 0.939 | 48.6% | — | +58 | — | 43.8% | -0.38 | 1–1 | 1–1 | — | -0.51 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2025 | 1785 | 124.3 | -1.30 | -0.39 | 1.055 | 51.6% | -174 | — | — | 46.7% | -0.07 | 0–1 | 1–2 (33%) | — | -0.15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2026 | 1855 | 146.3 | -1.65 | +3.45 | 1.014 | 50.4% | +4 | -38 | -267 | 53.8% | +0.32 | 6–2 (75%) | 7–4 (64%) | 107.1 | -0.30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2016 | 1513 | 105.1 | -1.21 | -1.34 | 0.948 | 49.0% | — | — | — | 33.3% | -1.00 | 0–1 | — | — | +0.12 |
| 22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2017 | 1539 | 101.7 | -2.02 | +2.19 | 0.841 | 46.4% | — | — | — | 28.6% | -0.86 | 1–0 | 0–1 | — | -0.24 |
| 23 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2018 | 1527 | 106.6 | -0.94 | -0.99 | 0.828 | 47.3% | — | — | — | 20.0% | -1.60 | 0–1 | 0–1 | — | -0.11 |
| 24 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2019 | 1614 | 110.0 | -0.49 | -2.02 | 0.873 | 47.4% | -51 | -3 | — | 43.8% | -0.78 | 2–2 (50%) | 2–1 (67%) | 101.2 | -0.25 |
| 25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2020 | 1522 | 103.9 | -2.49 | -0.45 | 0.879 | 46.8% | — | — | — | 25.0% | -1.00 | 0–2 | 0–1 | — | +0.08 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 1459 | 96.7 | -0.86 | -3.44 | 0.771 | 45.7% | — | — | — | 20.0% | -1.90 | 0–2 | — | — | +0.42 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2022 | 1427 | 99.6 | -4.86 | -1.99 | 0.773 | 44.3% | +20 | +19 | — | 27.6% | -1.79 | 1–4 (20%) | 1–0 | — | +0.58 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2023 | 1570 | 105.8 | +2.16 | -3.21 | 0.909 | 48.0% | — | — | — | 42.9% | -0.57 | 0–1 | — | — | 0.00 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2024 | 1547 | 121.5 | -1.11 | +0.30 | 0.975 | 49.5% | -58 | +43 | — | 51.7% | +0.21 | 2–1 (67%) | 2–2 (50%) | 101.3 | +0.33 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2025 | 1523 | 109.3 | +1.03 | -1.14 | 1.019 | 49.3% | — | — | — | 20.0% | -1.70 | 0–2 | 1–0 | — | +0.45 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2026 | 1530 | 105.4 | -2.25 | -1.31 | 0.558 | 40.8% | — | — | — | 20.0% | -2.20 | 0–1 | — | — | -0.24 |
| Career | — | 1885 | 136.2 | -1.67 | +2.58 | 0.972 | 49.5% | -26 | +6 | -267 | 48.7% | -0.06 | 7–4 (64%) | 9–7 (56%) | 105.5 | -1.92 | — | 1637 | 111.0 | -1.72 | -1.28 | 0.857 | 46.8% | -12 | +21 | — | 35.2% | -1.01 | 6–17 (26%) | 6–6 (50%) | 91.1 | +1.84 |
Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Anna Blinkova | 2 | 1 | 3 | Jul 21, 2026 | H2H |
| Ashlyn Krueger | 2 | 1 | 3 | Feb 2, 2026 | H2H |
| Ekaterina Alexandrova | 2 | 0 | 2 | Aug 18, 2026 | H2H |
| Barbora Krejcikova | 1 | 1 | 2 | Aug 16, 2026 | H2H |
| Karolina Pliskova | 1 | 1 | 2 | Aug 14, 2026 | H2H |
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Caroline Garcia | 1 | 3 | 4 | Jul 21, 2022 | H2H |
| Elina Avanesyan | 0 | 2 | 2 | Jul 26, 2024 | H2H |
| Maria Lourdes Carle | 2 | 0 | 2 | Jul 23, 2024 | H2H |
| Katerina Siniakova | 1 | 1 | 2 | May 30, 2024 | H2H |
| Lesia Tsurenko | 0 | 2 | 2 | Oct 19, 2023 | H2H |