H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Sara Errani vs Agnieszka Radwanska H2H: 2-4

Agnieszka Radwanska holds a 4–2 lead over Sara Errani in their WTA head-to-head. Across 6 main-draw meetings, Sara Errani leads 2–1 on clay, while Agnieszka Radwanska leads 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Sara Errani won the 2015 Stuttgart third round 7-6(8) 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Sara Errani
ITA Age 39 Right-Handed 164 cm / 5'5"
H2H
2 – 4
6 main draw meetings
Agnieszka Radwanska
POL Age 37 Right-Handed 173 cm / 5'8"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Apr 23, 2015* Stuttgart WTA 500 R32 Clay Sara Errani #15 7-6(8) 6-4 Agnieszka Radwanska #9 Match data
Aug 5, 2013 Toronto WTA 1000 QF Hard Agnieszka Radwanska #4 7-6(1) 7-5 Sara Errani #6 Match data
Jun 6, 2013* Roland Garros Grand Slam QF Clay Sara Errani #5 6-4 7-6(6) Agnieszka Radwanska #4 Match data
Oct 22, 2012 WTA Championships WTA Finals RR Hard Agnieszka Radwanska #4 6-7(6) 7-5 6-4 Sara Errani #7 Match data
May 10, 2012* Madrid WTA 1000 R32 Clay Agnieszka Radwanska #3 6-0 6-1 Sara Errani #24 Match data
Jun 26, 2010* Wimbledon Grand Slam R32 Grass Agnieszka Radwanska #9 6-3 6-1 Sara Errani #34 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Sara Errani #461 #5 5,835 2,024 384 299 56.2% 0 1 0 0 8 9
Agnieszka Radwanska #74 #2 8,530 2,081 506 237 68.1% 0 5 1 8 6 20

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Sara Errani Agnieszka Radwanska
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 — — — — — — — 2006 11–8 57.9% #61 1,673 0 0
18 — — — — — — — 2007 27–19 58.7% #26 1,808 0 1
19 2006 3–3 50.0% #174 1,529 0 0 2008 51–19 72.9% #10 1,926 0 4
20 2007 10–7 58.8% #69 1,615 0 0 2009 44–23 65.7% #10 1,910 0 4
21 2008 29–21 58.0% #42 1,747 0 2 2010 32–18 64.0% #14 1,860 0 4
22 2009 25–27 48.1% #47 1,656 0 2 2011 46–18 71.9% #8 1,979 0 7
23 2010 36–29 55.4% #43 1,720 0 2 2012 59–19 75.6% #4 1,994 0 10
24 2011 30–26 53.6% #45 1,671 0 2 2013 56–20 73.7% #5 1,957 0 13
25 2012 53–19 73.6% #6 1,901 0 6 2014 43–22 66.2% #6 1,872 0 14
26 2013 46–22 67.6% #7 1,894 0 7 2015 50–22 69.4% #5 1,957 0 17
27 2014 35–23 60.3% #14 1,773 0 7 2016 51–18 73.9% #3 1,942 0 20
28 2015 46–26 63.9% #20 1,752 0 8 2017 25–18 58.1% #28 1,812 0 20
29 2016 18–21 46.2% #49 1,625 0 9 2018 11–13 45.8% #74 1,727 0 20
30 2017 17–15 53.1% #144 1,650 0 9 — — — — — — —
31 2018 6–8 42.9% #112 1,765 0 9 — — — — — — —
32 2019 3–7 30.0% #198 1,567 0 9 — — — — — — —
33 2020 4–3 57.1% #131 1,604 0 9 — — — — — — —
34 2021 8–11 42.1% #121 1,579 0 9 — — — — — — —
35 2022 2–6 25.0% #109 1,597 0 9 — — — — — — —
36 2023 3–10 23.1% #105 1,550 0 9 — — — — — — —
37 2024 10–13 43.5% #105 1,699 0 9 — — — — — — —
38 2025 0–2 0.0% #461 1,594 0 9 — — — — — — —