H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC

Sara Errani vs Alizé Cornet H2H: 4-4

Sara Errani and Alizé Cornet are tied 4–4 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 8 main-draw meetings, Alizé Cornet leads 3–1 on clay, while Sara Errani leads 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Alizé Cornet won the 2018 Roland Garros first round 2-6 6-2 6-3.

ITA Age 39 Right-Handed 164 cm / 5'5"
H2H
4 4
8 main draw meetings
FRA Age 36 Right-Handed 173 cm / 5'8"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
May 29, 2018* Roland Garros Grand Slam R128 Clay Alizé Cornet #34 2-6 6-2 6-3 Sara Errani #75 Match data
May 17, 2017* Rome WTA 1000 R64 Clay Alizé Cornet #42 6-3 6-4 Sara Errani #90 Match data
Jun 30, 2016* Wimbledon Grand Slam R64 Grass Alizé Cornet #61 7-6(4) 7-5 Sara Errani #21 Match data
Feb 1, 2014* Paris WTA 500 SF Carpet Sara Errani #7 7-6(3) 3-6 7-6(5) Alizé Cornet #25 Match data
Aug 5, 2013 Toronto WTA 1000 R16 Hard Sara Errani #6 7-5 7-6(3) Alizé Cornet #30 Match data
Mar 2, 2013* Acapulco WTA 250 SF Clay Sara Errani #8 6-2 6-1 Alizé Cornet #36 Match data
Feb 24, 2012* Monterrey WTA 500 R16 Hard Sara Errani #36 6-2 6-3 Alizé Cornet #117 Match data
Apr 17, 2008* Charleston WTA 1000 R32 Clay Alizé Cornet #40 6-3 2-6 6-3 Sara Errani #63 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Sara Errani #461 #5 5,835 2,024 384 299 56.2% 0 1 0 0 8 9
Alizé Cornet #460 #11 3,256 1,884 376 358 51.2% 0 0 0 2 4 6

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Sara Errani Alizé Cornet
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 2005 1–1 50.0% #317 1,515 0 0
16 2006 1–2 33.3% #196 1,510 0 0
17 2007 8–9 47.1% #55 1,570 0 0
18 2008 34–21 61.8% #16 1,775 0 1
19 2006 3–3 50.0% #174 1,529 0 0 2009 20–24 45.5% #49 1,660 0 1
20 2007 10–7 58.8% #69 1,615 0 0 2010 17–20 45.9% #78 1,610 0 1
21 2008 29–21 58.0% #42 1,747 0 2 2011 10–17 37.0% #88 1,560 0 1
22 2009 25–27 48.1% #47 1,656 0 2 2012 21–19 52.5% #44 1,637 0 2
23 2010 36–29 55.4% #43 1,720 0 2 2013 35–27 56.5% #27 1,730 0 3
24 2011 30–26 53.6% #45 1,671 0 2 2014 37–24 60.7% #19 1,789 0 4
25 2012 53–19 73.6% #6 1,901 0 6 2015 23–26 46.9% #43 1,632 0 4
26 2013 46–22 67.6% #7 1,894 0 7 2016 20–19 51.3% #41 1,702 0 5
27 2014 35–23 60.3% #14 1,773 0 7 2017 23–22 51.1% #38 1,750 0 5
28 2015 46–26 63.9% #20 1,752 0 8 2018 22–23 48.9% #45 1,693 0 6
29 2016 18–21 46.2% #49 1,625 0 9 2019 25–22 53.2% #59 1,683 0 6
30 2017 17–15 53.1% #144 1,650 0 9 2020 13–9 59.1% #53 1,763 0 6
31 2018 6–8 42.9% #112 1,765 0 9 2021 24–23 51.1% #61 1,744 0 6
32 2019 3–7 30.0% #198 1,567 0 9 2022 26–23 53.1% #36 1,755 0 6
33 2020 4–3 57.1% #131 1,604 0 9 2023 15–19 44.1% #117 1,684 0 6
34 2021 8–11 42.1% #121 1,579 0 9 2024 1–7 12.5% #391 1,613 0 6
35 2022 2–6 25.0% #109 1,597 0 9 2025 0–1 0.0% #460 1,558 0 6
36 2023 3–10 23.1% #105 1,550 0 9
37 2024 10–13 43.5% #105 1,699 0 9
38 2025 0–2 0.0% #461 1,594 0 9