H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC

Sara Errani vs Anastasia Rodionova H2H: 1-1

Sara Errani and Anastasia Rodionova are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Anastasia Rodionova leads 1–0 on clay, while Sara Errani leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Anastasia Rodionova won the 2017 Charleston Open second round 6-2 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Sara Errani
Italy Age 39 Right-Handed 164 cm / 5'5"
H2H
1 – 1
2 main-draw meetings
Anastasia Rodionova
Australia Age 44 Right-Handed 167 cm / 5'6"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Anastasia Rodionova #669 6-2 6-2 Sara Errani #96 Match data Apr 6, 2017* R32 Charleston Open Premier → modern equivalent WTA 500 Clay
Sara Errani #14 6-4 7-6(2) Anastasia Rodionova #221 Match data Aug 28, 2014* R64 US Open Grand Slam Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Sara Errani #476 #5 5,835 2,005 387 304 56.0% 0 0 0 1 8 9
Anastasia Rodionova #872 #62 1,095 1,650 86 150 36.4% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Sara Errani Anastasia Rodionova
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 — — — — — — — 2000 0–1 0.0% #239 1,491 0 0
19 2006 3–3 50.0% #174 1,529 0 0 2001 0–2 0.0% #195 1,467 0 0
20 2007 10–7 58.8% #69 1,613 0 0 2002 5–3 62.5% #118 1,520 0 0
21 2008 29–22 56.9% #42 1,735 0 2 2003 7–8 46.7% #165 1,545 0 0
22 2009 25–27 48.1% #47 1,655 0 2 2004 0–1 0.0% #212 1,529 0 0
23 2010 36–29 55.4% #43 1,722 0 2 2005 2–3 40.0% #140 1,516 0 0
24 2011 30–26 53.6% #45 1,673 0 2 2006 10–15 40.0% #94 1,530 0 0
25 2012 53–20 72.6% #6 1,897 0 6 2007 11–20 35.5% #78 1,526 0 0
26 2013 46–22 67.6% #7 1,885 0 7 2008 8–20 28.6% #98 1,504 0 0
27 2014 35–23 60.3% #14 1,773 0 7 2009 5–9 35.7% #95 1,523 0 0
28 2015 46–26 63.9% #20 1,751 0 8 2010 17–20 45.9% #64 1,607 0 0
29 2016 21–23 47.7% #49 1,656 0 9 2011 8–21 27.6% #108 1,547 0 0
30 2017 18–16 52.9% #144 1,652 0 9 2012 6–13 31.6% #139 1,526 0 0
31 2018 6–8 42.9% #112 1,767 0 9 2013 2–7 22.2% #162 1,492 0 0
32 2019 2–6 25.0% #198 1,575 0 9 2014 2–3 40.0% #185 1,505 0 0
33 2020 4–3 57.1% #131 1,606 0 9 2015 1–2 33.3% #235 1,502 0 0
34 2021 8–12 40.0% #121 1,574 0 9 2016 0–1 0.0% #797 1,470 0 0
35 2022 2–5 28.6% #109 1,606 0 9 2017 2–1 66.7% #390 1,482 0 0
36 2023 3–10 23.1% #105 1,548 0 9 — — — — — — —
37 2024 10–14 41.7% #105 1,693 0 9 — — — — — — —
38 2025 0–2 0.0% #476 1,590 0 9 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Sara Errani Anastasia Rodionova
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2000 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2006 — — — — 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — — — — — 2001 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
20 2007 4 3 7 57.1% 6 4 10 60.0% — — — — — — — — 2002 1 1 2 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 3 1 4 75.0%
21 2008 14 10 24 58.3% 14 10 24 58.3% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 2003 3 4 7 42.9% 3 2 5 60.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
22 2009 16 14 30 53.3% 8 9 17 47.1% 1 3 4 25.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2004 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
23 2010 21 16 37 56.8% 11 10 21 52.4% 4 3 7 57.1% — — — — 2005 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
24 2011 14 16 30 46.7% 13 7 20 65.0% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — 2006 9 10 19 47.4% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0%
25 2012 23 14 37 62.2% 28 3 31 90.3% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — 2007 10 14 24 41.7% 1 5 6 16.7% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
26 2013 22 15 37 59.5% 21 5 26 80.8% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 1 4 75.0% 2008 6 13 19 31.6% 2 5 7 28.6% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
27 2014 13 14 27 48.1% 19 6 25 76.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 3 1 4 75.0% 2009 2 6 8 25.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
28 2015 22 17 39 56.4% 22 7 29 75.9% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 2010 7 11 18 38.9% 6 6 12 50.0% 4 3 7 57.1% — — — —
29 2016 13 14 27 48.1% 7 7 14 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 2011 4 14 18 22.2% 4 5 9 44.4% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
30 2017 7 6 13 53.8% 11 8 19 57.9% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 2012 3 6 9 33.3% 2 5 7 28.6% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
31 2018 1 2 3 33.3% 5 6 11 45.5% — — — — — — — — 2013 2 6 8 25.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
32 2019 0 2 2 0.0% 2 4 6 33.3% — — — — — — — — 2014 1 2 3 33.3% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — —
33 2020 1 1 2 50.0% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — — — — — 2015 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
34 2021 2 6 8 25.0% 6 6 12 50.0% — — — — — — — — 2016 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
35 2022 0 1 1 0.0% 2 4 6 33.3% — — — — — — — — 2017 — — — — 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — —
36 2023 1 3 4 25.0% 1 5 6 16.7% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
37 2024 4 6 10 40.0% 6 7 13 46.2% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
38 2025 — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 178 160 338 52.7% 188 115 303 62.0% 15 26 41 36.6% 6 3 9 66.7% — 51 94 145 35.2% 25 39 64 39.1% 7 15 22 31.8% 3 2 5 60.0%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 593/692 of Sara Errani's and 154/219 of Anastasia Rodionova's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Sara Errani Anastasia Rodionova
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
19 2006 1/6 0.0 1.0 76.4% 33.3% 38.5% 50.0% 16.7% 34.5% 39.5% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
20 2007 12/17 0.8 2.3 66.1% 56.1% 48.0% 41.1% 52.6% 53.4% 44.4% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
21 2008 34/51 0.5 2.7 64.2% 57.6% 46.0% 48.1% 45.8% 53.2% 45.7% 2003 1/15 2.0 7.0 60.0% 64.1% 26.9% 66.7% 0.0% 49.2% 32.1%
22 2009 44/52 0.3 2.5 69.2% 55.6% 44.7% 50.9% 45.1% 52.5% 44.6% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
23 2010 59/65 0.4 1.5 75.4% 56.2% 44.0% 55.5% 51.2% 53.4% 47.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
24 2011 53/56 0.4 1.9 76.2% 57.7% 47.2% 52.0% 48.6% 55.0% 47.1% 2006 5/25 1.6 2.4 68.3% 50.8% 35.0% 38.1% 31.3% 46.0% 38.2%
25 2012 63/73 0.3 1.1 76.1% 60.2% 49.9% 54.1% 56.5% 57.5% 51.5% 2007 22/31 0.9 2.3 63.8% 54.6% 44.9% 38.2% 58.7% 51.1% 37.2%
26 2013 57/68 0.1 1.1 82.1% 57.9% 48.5% 52.4% 51.1% 56.1% 50.4% 2008 24/28 1.5 3.4 60.0% 57.0% 40.4% 47.2% 45.2% 50.9% 40.3%
27 2014 54/58 0.1 1.2 81.3% 56.1% 45.3% 52.4% 50.1% 54.1% 48.1% 2009 13/14 1.1 1.6 65.0% 55.0% 41.5% 36.4% 48.0% 50.3% 42.9%
28 2015 54/72 0.1 1.4 83.3% 54.9% 50.0% 49.2% 55.4% 54.2% 49.7% 2010 30/37 1.8 3.3 62.3% 60.2% 44.7% 48.7% 56.1% 54.8% 42.4%
29 2016 38/45 0.1 1.2 85.4% 52.9% 43.6% 51.6% 52.4% 51.5% 48.0% 2011 27/29 1.1 2.3 63.7% 54.5% 41.4% 45.3% 48.2% 49.8% 40.7%
30 2017 31/34 0.1 1.3 78.7% 52.5% 41.2% 40.6% 54.1% 50.3% 49.6% 2012 16/19 1.5 3.0 63.5% 59.4% 41.7% 50.9% 45.6% 53.1% 38.4%
31 2018 14/14 0.1 2.9 81.3% 57.5% 36.7% 41.9% 45.6% 53.8% 46.0% 2013 8/9 1.1 3.1 62.2% 60.7% 45.2% 52.3% 48.1% 54.5% 38.1%
32 2019 8/8 0.1 8.0 61.0% 51.0% 28.4% 30.1% 44.3% 42.3% 46.0% 2014 3/5 0.7 4.3 60.6% 48.4% 39.1% 49.1% 44.4% 44.7% 36.0%
33 2020 7/7 0.0 4.6 77.6% 54.9% 39.2% 58.2% 57.5% 51.3% 51.3% 2015 1/3 1.0 4.0 56.7% 68.4% 44.8% 33.3% 18.2% 58.2% 32.4%
34 2021 19/20 0.1 2.9 78.4% 52.1% 36.1% 52.3% 55.8% 48.5% 49.7% 2016 1/1 0.0 3.0 56.3% 59.3% 47.6% 50.0% 20.0% 54.2% 32.8%
35 2022 7/7 0.0 1.9 80.7% 52.1% 33.4% 39.3% 47.1% 48.4% 45.5% 2017 3/3 1.0 2.7 65.7% 58.1% 52.6% 40.0% 62.2% 56.2% 52.5%
36 2023 13/13 0.0 1.5 79.1% 47.8% 31.7% 36.6% 49.8% 44.5% 41.9% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
37 2024 23/24 0.1 1.5 77.5% 52.4% 42.3% 41.1% 47.1% 49.8% 44.4% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
38 2025 2/2 0.0 1.5 82.0% 53.3% 47.6% 49.5% 75.0% 52.2% 36.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 593/692 0.2 1.7 77.3% 55.8% 44.9% 49.9% 51.1% 53.3% 47.9% — 154/236 1.3 2.8 62.9% 56.9% 42.6% 45.3% 49.4% 51.7% 40.2%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Sara Errani Anastasia Rodionova
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2000 1491 100.7 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.00 — — — -0.10
19 2006 1529 107.3 -2.72 -1.03 0.604 36.7% — +41 — 46.2% -0.39 1–0 1–0 — -0.21 2001 1468 97.2 — — — — — — — 20.0% -2.60 0–1 — — -0.01
20 2007 1614 121.3 -0.77 +0.04 0.953 49.0% -56 +20 — 55.0% +0.43 4–2 (67%) 3–2 (60%) 103.4 -0.20 2002 1521 110.8 — — — — +31 — — 68.8% +1.25 1–1 2–0 — +0.66
21 2008 1735 135.4 -1.78 +1.64 0.976 49.4% -49 -6 -147 53.8% +0.34 10–7 (59%) 4–5 (44%) 102.2 -1.64 2003 1546 112.1 -0.41 -1.53 0.632 41.5% +13 -5 +64 44.4% -0.11 4–2 (67%) 2–3 (40%) 103.0 +0.44
22 2009 1655 132.5 -2.62 +1.07 0.938 48.6% +1 +49 -81 50.9% +0.04 5–7 (42%) 6–3 (67%) 100.5 +0.75 2004 1530 99.5 — — — — — — — 33.3% -1.67 0–1 — — +0.03
23 2010 1723 134.3 -2.26 +3.11 1.025 50.6% +16 -53 -104 56.5% +0.29 6–11 (35%) 12–6 (67%) 100.8 +1.24 2005 1516 101.2 — — — — +8 — — 45.5% -0.55 0–1 — — +0.62
24 2011 1673 134.0 -0.30 +3.09 1.047 51.0% -6 +66 -54 54.0% +0.26 7–11 (39%) 5–6 (45%) 97.1 -1.90 2006 1531 105.6 -3.96 -2.68 0.708 42.0% +19 — +38 38.9% -1.06 5–3 (63%) 1–0 — +0.88
25 2012 1898 155.0 +1.80 +6.73 1.210 54.4% -78 +149 -273 69.0% +1.52 11–5 (69%) 7–3 (70%) 107.8 -1.43 2007 1526 112.8 -3.50 -4.50 0.761 44.3% +38 -79 — 38.3% -1.28 3–1 (75%) 1–4 (20%) 101.3 -0.27
26 2013 1886 156.0 +1.16 +6.37 1.149 53.2% -27 +186 — 62.2% +0.85 10–5 (67%) 6–5 (55%) 103.2 -0.44 2008 1505 113.6 -2.71 -1.63 0.821 45.9% +44 -61 — 29.1% -1.78 1–4 (20%) 4–1 (80%) 99.2 -0.65
27 2014 1774 140.1 -1.37 +3.74 1.048 51.1% -49 +280 — 58.0% +0.40 9–10 (47%) 10–6 (63%) 95.0 +2.02 2009 1524 107.2 -3.03 -0.73 0.863 46.5% -3 -24 — 41.9% -0.68 2–3 (40%) 2–1 (67%) 101.2 -0.01
28 2015 1752 137.5 -3.26 +7.03 1.083 52.0% -25 +216 -179 58.6% +0.66 18–11 (62%) 12–6 (67%) 104.0 +3.08 2010 1607 116.6 -0.85 -0.88 0.938 48.8% -41 -81 -33 43.9% -0.63 8–6 (57%) 2–3 (40%) 103.6 -0.61
29 2016 1657 128.4 -3.45 +3.74 0.989 49.8% +7 +192 -112 49.5% -0.14 5–8 (38%) 8–5 (62%) 94.9 +0.33 2011 1547 124.2 -3.69 -1.81 0.811 45.4% -34 +33 — 30.6% -1.40 3–5 (38%) 3–6 (33%) 97.8 -0.88
30 2017 1652 117.1 -4.83 +3.87 0.998 49.9% +19 +108 — 53.3% +0.13 5–4 (56%) 6–2 (75%) 103.4 +0.62 2012 1527 116.9 -1.23 -2.69 0.818 46.1% -15 +15 +3 36.4% -0.68 2–4 (33%) 1–2 (33%) — -0.61
31 2018 1767 125.7 -0.84 +2.69 0.996 50.0% +17 -5 — 48.5% -0.21 1–4 (20%) 2–1 (67%) 96.4 -1.13 2013 1492 113.2 -0.47 -2.98 0.838 46.1% -9 — — 33.3% -1.17 0–2 1–3 (25%) — -0.02
32 2019 1575 92.5 -7.16 -0.74 0.798 44.2% — +37 — 31.6% -1.74 1–2 (33%) — — +0.92 2014 1506 99.3 -1.73 -2.26 0.650 40.2% -19 — — 33.3% -1.75 2–0 0–1 — -0.10
33 2020 1607 122.5 -2.17 +3.15 1.053 51.1% — +33 — 55.6% +0.06 2–2 (50%) 1–1 — -0.05 2015 1502 99.6 +0.38 -1.15 0.776 44.7% — — — 33.3% -1.83 — — — -0.01
34 2021 1575 114.0 -4.44 +2.94 0.966 49.1% -11 +76 — 39.5% -0.79 2–3 (40%) 1–3 (25%) 97.1 -0.94 2016 1470 102.2 -3.27 -2.73 0.715 42.5% — — — 0.0% -3.50 — — — +0.22
35 2022 1607 109.2 -3.27 +0.30 0.881 46.5% — +45 — 35.7% -0.64 1–1 0–1 — -0.07 2017 1483 106.0 +1.78 +1.28 1.200 54.3% — +62 — 66.7% +1.33 — 1–0 — -0.02
36 2023 1548 97.8 -6.59 -1.63 0.755 43.4% -51 +75 -7 24.1% -2.07 2–1 (67%) 0–1 — -0.14 2018 1445 96.9 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
37 2024 1693 123.6 -4.63 +1.30 0.884 47.1% -121 +82 — 37.7% -0.94 5–0 (100%) 1–2 (33%) 106.5 -1.08 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
38 2025 1590 105.5 -0.55 +0.36 0.771 45.0% — — — 20.0% -1.60 0–1 0–1 — -0.15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 2006 138.5 -1.81 +3.71 1.026 50.6% -25 +106 -122 54.6% +0.29 105–95 (53%) 85–59 (59%) 104.5 -0.06 — 1650 116.6 -2.29 -2.02 0.833 46.1% +6 -26 +5 38.4% -0.97 31–34 (48%) 20–24 (45%) 103.2 -0.19

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.