H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 16:30 UTC

Sara Errani vs Kirsten Flipkens H2H: 4-0

Sara Errani holds a 4–0 lead over Kirsten Flipkens in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Sara Errani leads 3–0 on hard courts and 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Sara Errani won the 2018 Istanbul third round 6-3 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Sara Errani
ITA Age 39 Right-Handed 164 cm / 5'5"
H2H
4 – 0
4 main draw meetings
Kirsten Flipkens
BEL Age 40 Right-Handed 165 cm / 5'5"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
May 5, 2018 Madrid WTA 1000 Q2 Q Clay Sara Errani #89 5-7 6-1 6-0 Kirsten Flipkens #73 Match data
Apr 26, 2018* Istanbul WTA 250 R32 Clay Sara Errani #93 6-3 6-4 Kirsten Flipkens #70 Match data
Aug 27, 2014* US Open Grand Slam R128 Hard Sara Errani #14 6-1 7-5 Kirsten Flipkens #47 Match data
Oct 2, 2013* Beijing WTA 1000 R64 Hard Sara Errani #6 7-6(3) 6-1 Kirsten Flipkens #19 Match data
Jan 16, 2010* Hobart WTA 250 QF Hard Sara Errani #50 6-3 6-4 Kirsten Flipkens #80 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Sara Errani #461 #5 5,835 2,024 384 299 56.2% 0 1 0 0 8 9
Kirsten Flipkens #531 #13 2,961 1,829 198 221 47.3% 0 0 0 0 1 1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Sara Errani Kirsten Flipkens
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 — — — — — — — 2003 0–2 0.0% #380 1,485 0 0
18 — — — — — — — 2004 2–2 50.0% #168 1,500 0 0
19 2006 3–3 50.0% #174 1,529 0 0 2005 1–2 33.3% #202 1,498 0 0
20 2007 10–7 58.8% #69 1,615 0 0 2006 3–5 37.5% #104 1,523 0 0
21 2008 29–21 58.0% #42 1,747 0 2 2007 0–2 0.0% #287 1,507 0 0
22 2009 25–27 48.1% #47 1,656 0 2 2008 1–2 33.3% #111 1,501 0 0
23 2010 36–29 55.4% #43 1,720 0 2 2009 8–10 44.4% #81 1,587 0 0
24 2011 30–26 53.6% #45 1,671 0 2 2010 15–15 50.0% #77 1,666 0 0
25 2012 53–19 73.6% #6 1,901 0 6 2011 5–9 35.7% #192 1,608 0 0
26 2013 46–22 67.6% #7 1,894 0 7 2012 13–4 76.5% #54 1,762 0 1
27 2014 35–23 60.3% #14 1,773 0 7 2013 32–23 58.2% #20 1,734 0 1
28 2015 46–26 63.9% #20 1,752 0 8 2014 23–26 46.9% #45 1,657 0 1
29 2016 18–21 46.2% #49 1,625 0 9 2015 14–17 45.2% #85 1,657 0 1
30 2017 17–15 53.1% #144 1,650 0 9 2016 21–20 51.2% #65 1,642 0 1
31 2018 6–8 42.9% #112 1,765 0 9 2017 16–21 43.2% #74 1,695 0 1
32 2019 3–7 30.0% #198 1,567 0 9 2018 21–20 51.2% #47 1,660 0 1
33 2020 4–3 57.1% #131 1,604 0 9 2019 15–22 40.5% #71 1,747 0 1
34 2021 8–11 42.1% #121 1,579 0 9 2020 2–8 20.0% #86 1,703 0 1
35 2022 2–6 25.0% #109 1,597 0 9 2021 1–6 14.3% #311 1,659 0 1
36 2023 3–10 23.1% #105 1,550 0 9 2022 5–5 50.0% #251 1,685 0 1
37 2024 10–13 43.5% #105 1,699 0 9 — — — — — — —
38 2025 0–2 0.0% #461 1,594 0 9 — — — — — — —