H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 04:30 UTC

Sara Errani vs Svetlana Kuznetsova H2H: 1-6

Svetlana Kuznetsova holds a 6–1 lead over Sara Errani in their WTA head-to-head. Across 7 main-draw meetings, Svetlana Kuznetsova leads 5–0 on hard courts, while Sara Errani leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Svetlana Kuznetsova won the 2013 Tokyo third round 6-4 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Sara Errani
ITA Age 39 Right-Handed 164 cm / 5'5"
H2H
1 – 6
7 main draw meetings
Svetlana Kuznetsova
RUS Age 41 Right-Handed 174 cm / 5'9"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Sep 26, 2013* Tokyo WTA 1000 R32 Hard Svetlana Kuznetsova #27 6-4 6-4 Sara Errani #6 Match data
Jun 4, 2012* Roland Garros Grand Slam R16 Clay Sara Errani #24 6-0 7-5 Svetlana Kuznetsova #28 Match data
Jan 7, 2012* Auckland WTA 250 QF Hard Svetlana Kuznetsova #19 6-4 6-3 Sara Errani #45 Match data
Aug 31, 2011* US Open Grand Slam R128 Hard Svetlana Kuznetsova #17 7-5 6-1 Sara Errani #38 Match data
Jun 17, 2011* 's Hertogenbosch WTA 250 R16 Grass Svetlana Kuznetsova #12 3-6 7-6(3) 6-1 Sara Errani #35 Match data
Aug 6, 2010* San Diego WTA 500 R16 Hard Svetlana Kuznetsova #21 6-1 6-7(5) 7-5 Sara Errani #36 Match data
Oct 10, 2008* Moscow WTA 1000 R16 Hard Svetlana Kuznetsova #7 7-6(0) 6-1 Sara Errani #43 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Sara Errani #461 #5 5,835 2,024 384 299 56.2% 0 1 0 0 8 9
Svetlana Kuznetsova #1,203 #2 6,191 2,097 580 319 64.5% 2 2 0 10 4 18

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Sara Errani Svetlana Kuznetsova
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 — — — — — — — 2001 2–2 50.0% #266 1,519 0 0
17 — — — — — — — 2002 22–9 71.0% #43 1,744 0 2
18 — — — — — — — 2003 22–16 57.9% #35 1,819 0 2
19 2006 3–3 50.0% #174 1,529 0 0 2004 54–19 74.0% #5 2,026 1 5
20 2007 10–7 58.8% #69 1,615 0 0 2005 29–17 63.0% #18 1,868 1 5
21 2008 29–21 58.0% #42 1,747 0 2 2006 61–20 75.3% #4 2,039 1 8
22 2009 25–27 48.1% #47 1,656 0 2 2007 51–20 71.8% #2 1,994 1 9
23 2010 36–29 55.4% #43 1,720 0 2 2008 41–20 67.2% #8 1,934 1 9
24 2011 30–26 53.6% #45 1,671 0 2 2009 41–16 71.9% #3 1,981 2 12
25 2012 53–19 73.6% #6 1,901 0 6 2010 26–16 61.9% #27 1,884 2 13
26 2013 46–22 67.6% #7 1,894 0 7 2011 31–19 62.0% #19 1,804 2 13
27 2014 35–23 60.3% #14 1,773 0 7 2012 13–12 52.0% #71 1,776 2 13
28 2015 46–26 63.9% #20 1,752 0 8 2013 29–18 61.7% #21 1,827 2 13
29 2016 18–21 46.2% #49 1,625 0 9 2014 27–18 60.0% #27 1,845 2 14
30 2017 17–15 53.1% #144 1,650 0 9 2015 26–19 57.8% #25 1,836 2 15
31 2018 6–8 42.9% #112 1,765 0 9 2016 40–20 66.7% #9 1,917 2 17
32 2019 3–7 30.0% #198 1,567 0 9 2017 32–17 65.3% #12 1,826 2 17
33 2020 4–3 57.1% #131 1,604 0 9 2018 6–12 33.3% #106 1,709 2 18
34 2021 8–11 42.1% #121 1,579 0 9 2019 14–13 51.9% #53 1,772 2 18
35 2022 2–6 25.0% #109 1,597 0 9 2020 8–7 53.3% #36 1,799 2 18
36 2023 3–10 23.1% #105 1,550 0 9 2021 5–9 35.7% #109 1,726 2 18
37 2024 10–13 43.5% #105 1,699 0 9 — — — — — — —
38 2025 0–2 0.0% #461 1,594 0 9 — — — — — — —