H2H data updated: 2026-09-13 00:00 UTC

Sara Errani vs Timea Bacsinszky H2H: 1-3

Timea Bacsinszky holds a 3–1 lead over Sara Errani in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on clay, while Timea Bacsinszky leads 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Timea Bacsinszky won the 2015 China Open quarterfinal 0-6 6-3 7-5.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Sara Errani
Italy Age 39 Right-Handed 164 cm / 5'5"
H2H
1 – 3
4 main-draw meetings
Timea Bacsinszky
Switzerland Age 37 Right-Handed 170 cm / 5'7"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Timea Bacsinszky #17 0-6 6-3 7-5 Sara Errani #20 Match data Oct 9, 2015* QF China Open Premier Mandatory → modern equivalent WTA 1000 Hard
Timea Bacsinszky #31 6-0 4-6 7-6(3) Sara Errani #12 Match data Mar 7, 2015* SF Monterrey Open International → modern equivalent WTA 250 Hard
Sara Errani #24 6-0 3-0 (ret.) Timea Bacsinszky #442 Match data May 16, 2012* R64 Italian Open Premier 5 → modern equivalent WTA 1000 Clay
Timea Bacsinszky #115 5-7 6-4 6-0 Sara Errani #38 Match data Jul 9, 2009* R32 Budapest International → modern equivalent WTA 250 Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Sara Errani #476 #5 5,835 2,005 387 304 56.0% 0 0 0 1 8 9
Timea Bacsinszky #941 #9 3,157 1,935 163 141 53.6% 0 0 0 0 4 4

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Sara Errani Timea Bacsinszky
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 — — — — — — — 2004 0–2 0.0% #252 1,484 0 0
17 — — — — — — — 2006 3–3 50.0% #124 1,541 0 0
18 — — — — — — — 2007 2–6 25.0% #122 1,522 0 0
19 2006 3–3 50.0% #174 1,529 0 0 2008 13–16 44.8% #54 1,589 0 0
20 2007 10–7 58.8% #69 1,613 0 0 2009 17–10 63.0% #53 1,739 0 1
21 2008 29–22 56.9% #42 1,735 0 2 2010 19–21 47.5% #50 1,694 0 1
22 2009 25–27 48.1% #47 1,655 0 2 2011 3–6 33.3% #247 1,663 0 1
23 2010 36–29 55.4% #43 1,722 0 2 2012 2–6 25.0% #179 1,604 0 1
24 2011 30–26 53.6% #45 1,673 0 2 2013 0–1 0.0% #237 1,597 0 1
25 2012 53–20 72.6% #6 1,897 0 6 2014 11–10 52.4% #48 1,678 0 1
26 2013 46–22 67.6% #7 1,885 0 7 2015 37–14 72.5% #12 1,845 0 3
27 2014 35–23 60.3% #14 1,773 0 7 2016 32–19 62.7% #15 1,758 0 4
28 2015 46–26 63.9% #20 1,751 0 8 2017 15–9 62.5% #39 1,809 0 4
29 2016 21–23 47.7% #49 1,656 0 9 2018 3–8 27.3% #191 1,721 0 4
30 2017 18–16 52.9% #144 1,652 0 9 2019 6–10 37.5% #139 1,641 0 4
31 2018 6–8 42.9% #112 1,767 0 9 — — — — — — —
32 2019 2–6 25.0% #198 1,575 0 9 — — — — — — —
33 2020 4–3 57.1% #131 1,606 0 9 — — — — — — —
34 2021 8–12 40.0% #121 1,574 0 9 — — — — — — —
35 2022 2–5 28.6% #109 1,606 0 9 — — — — — — —
36 2023 3–10 23.1% #105 1,548 0 9 — — — — — — —
37 2024 10–14 41.7% #105 1,693 0 9 — — — — — — —
38 2025 0–2 0.0% #476 1,590 0 9 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Sara Errani Timea Bacsinszky
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2004 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2006 2 1 3 66.7% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — —
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2007 0 2 2 0.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
19 2006 — — — — 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — — — — — 2008 6 8 14 42.9% 6 7 13 46.2% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
20 2007 4 3 7 57.1% 6 4 10 60.0% — — — — — — — — 2009 10 5 15 66.7% 6 3 9 66.7% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
21 2008 14 10 24 58.3% 14 10 24 58.3% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 2010 9 12 21 42.9% 10 7 17 58.8% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
22 2009 16 14 30 53.3% 8 9 17 47.1% 1 3 4 25.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2011 3 5 8 37.5% — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
23 2010 21 16 37 56.8% 11 10 21 52.4% 4 3 7 57.1% — — — — 2012 1 3 4 25.0% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — —
24 2011 14 16 30 46.7% 13 7 20 65.0% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — 2013 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
25 2012 23 14 37 62.2% 28 3 31 90.3% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — 2014 7 7 14 50.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
26 2013 22 15 37 59.5% 21 5 26 80.8% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 1 4 75.0% 2015 24 9 33 72.7% 9 4 13 69.2% 4 1 5 80.0% — — — —
27 2014 13 14 27 48.1% 19 6 25 76.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 3 1 4 75.0% 2016 13 13 26 50.0% 17 4 21 81.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — —
28 2015 22 17 39 56.4% 22 7 29 75.9% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 2017 4 3 7 57.1% 9 4 13 69.2% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — —
29 2016 13 14 27 48.1% 7 7 14 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 2018 3 7 10 30.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
30 2017 7 6 13 53.8% 11 8 19 57.9% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 2019 4 6 10 40.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
31 2018 1 2 3 33.3% 5 6 11 45.5% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2019 0 2 2 0.0% 2 4 6 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2020 1 1 2 50.0% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2021 2 6 8 25.0% 6 6 12 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2022 0 1 1 0.0% 2 4 6 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 2023 1 3 4 25.0% 1 5 6 16.7% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
37 2024 4 6 10 40.0% 6 7 13 46.2% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
38 2025 — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 178 160 338 52.7% 188 115 303 62.0% 15 26 41 36.6% 6 3 9 66.7% — 86 83 169 50.9% 66 44 110 60.0% 11 11 22 50.0% 0 3 3 0.0%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 593/692 of Sara Errani's and 266/303 of Timea Bacsinszky's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Sara Errani Timea Bacsinszky
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
17 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2006 3/6 3.7 3.3 51.7% 77.8% 56.8% 87.9% 61.7% 67.9% 44.9%
18 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2007 5/8 2.0 2.2 57.5% 63.2% 43.5% 44.1% 47.8% 54.5% 41.3%
19 2006 1/6 0.0 1.0 76.4% 33.3% 38.5% 50.0% 16.7% 34.5% 39.5% 2008 25/29 2.6 3.0 55.2% 62.1% 45.0% 45.3% 40.7% 54.5% 44.2%
20 2007 12/17 0.8 2.3 66.1% 56.1% 48.0% 41.1% 52.6% 53.4% 44.4% 2009 23/27 3.2 2.4 59.3% 64.1% 45.7% 57.5% 50.2% 56.6% 45.3%
21 2008 34/51 0.5 2.7 64.2% 57.6% 46.0% 48.1% 45.8% 53.2% 45.7% 2010 38/40 2.3 3.7 58.8% 61.1% 45.5% 58.0% 53.3% 54.4% 44.8%
22 2009 44/52 0.3 2.5 69.2% 55.6% 44.7% 50.9% 45.1% 52.5% 44.6% 2011 4/9 3.5 5.8 55.6% 62.9% 38.2% 59.9% 44.2% 51.9% 42.0%
23 2010 59/65 0.4 1.5 75.4% 56.2% 44.0% 55.5% 51.2% 53.4% 47.7% 2012 8/8 0.5 2.6 66.8% 50.8% 35.6% 37.0% 43.7% 45.9% 41.9%
24 2011 53/56 0.4 1.9 76.2% 57.7% 47.2% 52.0% 48.6% 55.0% 47.1% 2013 1/1 0.0 4.0 66.1% 51.2% 42.9% 44.4% 66.7% 48.4% 41.9%
25 2012 63/73 0.3 1.1 76.1% 60.2% 49.9% 54.1% 56.5% 57.5% 51.5% 2014 20/21 1.5 2.5 67.0% 62.6% 44.5% 56.6% 47.4% 56.7% 46.1%
26 2013 57/68 0.1 1.1 82.1% 57.9% 48.5% 52.4% 51.1% 56.1% 50.4% 2015 44/51 1.9 3.0 67.9% 63.4% 52.1% 51.8% 51.3% 59.8% 44.9%
27 2014 54/58 0.1 1.2 81.3% 56.1% 45.3% 52.4% 50.1% 54.1% 48.1% 2016 47/52 1.1 2.0 68.4% 62.2% 48.3% 52.0% 47.0% 57.6% 46.8%
28 2015 54/72 0.1 1.4 83.3% 54.9% 50.0% 49.2% 55.4% 54.2% 49.7% 2017 24/24 1.8 2.0 65.9% 62.6% 52.8% 52.0% 48.6% 59.5% 47.6%
29 2016 38/45 0.1 1.2 85.4% 52.9% 43.6% 51.6% 52.4% 51.5% 48.0% 2018 11/11 1.7 3.5 63.4% 61.9% 41.4% 50.7% 50.5% 54.6% 40.5%
30 2017 31/34 0.1 1.3 78.7% 52.5% 41.2% 40.6% 54.1% 50.3% 49.6% 2019 13/16 1.7 1.7 63.4% 59.2% 45.7% 48.6% 52.5% 54.3% 44.2%
31 2018 14/14 0.1 2.9 81.3% 57.5% 36.7% 41.9% 45.6% 53.8% 46.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
32 2019 8/8 0.1 8.0 61.0% 51.0% 28.4% 30.1% 44.3% 42.3% 46.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
33 2020 7/7 0.0 4.6 77.6% 54.9% 39.2% 58.2% 57.5% 51.3% 51.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
34 2021 19/20 0.1 2.9 78.4% 52.1% 36.1% 52.3% 55.8% 48.5% 49.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
35 2022 7/7 0.0 1.9 80.7% 52.1% 33.4% 39.3% 47.1% 48.4% 45.5% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
36 2023 13/13 0.0 1.5 79.1% 47.8% 31.7% 36.6% 49.8% 44.5% 41.9% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
37 2024 23/24 0.1 1.5 77.5% 52.4% 42.3% 41.1% 47.1% 49.8% 44.4% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
38 2025 2/2 0.0 1.5 82.0% 53.3% 47.6% 49.5% 75.0% 52.2% 36.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 593/692 0.2 1.7 77.3% 55.8% 44.9% 49.9% 51.1% 53.3% 47.9% — 266/305 1.9 2.7 63.5% 62.1% 47.2% 52.7% 49.0% 56.5% 45.1%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Sara Errani Timea Bacsinszky
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2004 1485 103.3 — — — — — — — 20.0% -1.80 0–1 0–1 — -0.11
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2006 1542 116.2 +3.56 +1.88 1.400 57.0% +31 -31 — 36.4% -0.64 1–0 — — -0.37
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2007 1522 115.5 -0.18 -0.57 0.907 47.9% — -4 — 33.3% -0.33 0–2 1–2 (33%) — -0.40
19 2006 1529 107.3 -2.72 -1.03 0.604 36.7% — +41 — 46.2% -0.39 1–0 1–0 — -0.21 2008 1589 126.2 -0.62 +0.29 0.970 49.3% +20 -40 — 44.6% -0.45 4–5 (44%) 1–2 (33%) 100.8 -0.23
20 2007 1614 121.3 -0.77 +0.04 0.953 49.0% -56 +20 — 55.0% +0.43 4–2 (67%) 3–2 (60%) 103.4 -0.20 2009 1740 124.9 +0.62 +0.51 1.044 51.0% -48 -88 — 56.7% +0.45 6–2 (75%) 1–2 (33%) 105.7 +0.19
21 2008 1735 135.4 -1.78 +1.64 0.976 49.4% -49 -6 -147 53.8% +0.34 10–7 (59%) 4–5 (44%) 102.2 -1.64 2010 1694 127.2 -1.10 +1.16 0.983 49.6% -12 -15 — 46.6% -0.19 5–5 (50%) 4–7 (36%) 96.6 +1.27
22 2009 1655 132.5 -2.62 +1.07 0.938 48.6% +1 +49 -81 50.9% +0.04 5–7 (42%) 6–3 (67%) 100.5 +0.75 2011 1664 120.0 +0.92 +0.57 0.873 47.3% -9 — — 36.4% -1.00 2–2 (50%) 0–1 — -0.28
23 2010 1723 134.3 -2.26 +3.11 1.025 50.6% +16 -53 -104 56.5% +0.29 6–11 (35%) 12–6 (67%) 100.8 +1.24 2012 1604 100.6 -3.34 -1.85 0.775 43.6% +16 +53 — 25.0% -1.58 1–1 0–1 — -0.15
24 2011 1673 134.0 -0.30 +3.09 1.047 51.0% -6 +66 -54 54.0% +0.26 7–11 (39%) 5–6 (45%) 97.1 -1.90 2013 1597 104.4 -0.12 +0.61 0.812 45.2% — — — 0.0% -3.00 — — — -0.32
25 2012 1898 155.0 +1.80 +6.73 1.210 54.4% -78 +149 -273 69.0% +1.52 11–5 (69%) 7–3 (70%) 107.8 -1.43 2014 1679 141.7 +1.87 +2.26 1.066 51.2% -13 +1 — 53.3% +0.42 1–4 (20%) 1–4 (20%) 94.6 -0.84
26 2013 1886 156.0 +1.16 +6.37 1.149 53.2% -27 +186 — 62.2% +0.85 10–5 (67%) 6–5 (55%) 103.2 -0.44 2015 1845 146.1 +1.78 +3.78 1.118 52.2% -20 -75 -157 64.4% +0.91 16–4 (80%) 4–4 (50%) 109.4 -1.30
27 2014 1774 140.1 -1.37 +3.74 1.048 51.1% -49 +280 — 58.0% +0.40 9–10 (47%) 10–6 (63%) 95.0 +2.02 2016 1759 141.7 +1.97 +2.62 1.105 52.1% -20 +159 -87 60.0% +0.77 10–5 (67%) 2–3 (40%) 104.1 +1.27
28 2015 1752 137.5 -3.26 +7.03 1.083 52.0% -25 +216 -179 58.6% +0.66 18–11 (62%) 12–6 (67%) 104.0 +3.08 2017 1809 137.6 +2.69 +3.09 1.176 53.2% -61 +141 -121 66.0% +1.45 4–5 (44%) 3–2 (60%) 97.5 -0.19
29 2016 1657 128.4 -3.45 +3.74 0.989 49.8% +7 +192 -112 49.5% -0.14 5–8 (38%) 8–5 (62%) 94.9 +0.33 2018 1722 119.2 -1.27 -1.05 0.891 47.5% -27 — — 34.6% -1.58 1–5 (17%) 2–1 (67%) 95.4 -0.52
30 2017 1652 117.1 -4.83 +3.87 0.998 49.9% +19 +108 — 53.3% +0.13 5–4 (56%) 6–2 (75%) 103.4 +0.62 2019 1642 126.3 -1.44 +0.08 0.966 49.1% +23 +199 — 42.1% -0.50 2–4 (33%) 0–3 (0%) 94.1 -0.93
31 2018 1767 125.7 -0.84 +2.69 0.996 50.0% +17 -5 — 48.5% -0.21 1–4 (20%) 2–1 (67%) 96.4 -1.13 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2019 1575 92.5 -7.16 -0.74 0.798 44.2% — +37 — 31.6% -1.74 1–2 (33%) — — +0.92 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2020 1607 122.5 -2.17 +3.15 1.053 51.1% — +33 — 55.6% +0.06 2–2 (50%) 1–1 — -0.05 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2021 1575 114.0 -4.44 +2.94 0.966 49.1% -11 +76 — 39.5% -0.79 2–3 (40%) 1–3 (25%) 97.1 -0.94 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2022 1607 109.2 -3.27 +0.30 0.881 46.5% — +45 — 35.7% -0.64 1–1 0–1 — -0.07 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 2023 1548 97.8 -6.59 -1.63 0.755 43.4% -51 +75 -7 24.1% -2.07 2–1 (67%) 0–1 — -0.14 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
37 2024 1693 123.6 -4.63 +1.30 0.884 47.1% -121 +82 — 37.7% -0.94 5–0 (100%) 1–2 (33%) 106.5 -1.08 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
38 2025 1590 105.5 -0.55 +0.36 0.771 45.0% — — — 20.0% -1.60 0–1 0–1 — -0.15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 2006 138.5 -1.81 +3.71 1.026 50.6% -25 +106 -122 54.6% +0.29 105–95 (53%) 85–59 (59%) 104.5 -0.06 — 1936 141.2 +0.69 +1.70 1.038 50.7% -15 +35 -124 52.4% +0.21 53–45 (54%) 19–33 (37%) 96.0 -0.96

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.