H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 16:32 UTC

Sara Errani vs Victoria Azarenka H2H: 2-7

Victoria Azarenka holds a 7–2 lead over Sara Errani in their WTA head-to-head. Across 9 main-draw meetings, Victoria Azarenka leads 3–2 on hard courts and 4–0 on clay. Most recently, Sara Errani won the 2015 Toronto fourth round 7-5 6-3.

ITA Age 39 Right-Handed 164 cm / 5'5"
H2H
2 7
9 main draw meetings
BLR Age 36 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Aug 14, 2015* Toronto WTA 1000 R16 Hard Sara Errani #17 7-5 6-3 Victoria Azarenka #21 Match data
Oct 21, 2013 WTA Championships WTA Finals RR Hard Victoria Azarenka #2 7-6(4) 6-2 Sara Errani #7 Match data
May 18, 2013* Rome WTA 1000 SF Clay Victoria Azarenka #3 6-0 7-5 Sara Errani #6 Match data
Feb 16, 2013* Doha WTA 1000 QF Hard Victoria Azarenka #1 6-2 6-2 Sara Errani #7 Match data
May 12, 2011* Rome WTA 1000 R32 Clay Victoria Azarenka #4 6-1 6-2 Sara Errani #39 Match data
Apr 9, 2011* Marbella WTA 250 SF Clay Victoria Azarenka #6 6-2 6-1 Sara Errani #43 Match data
Jan 10, 2009* Brisbane WTA 500 SF Hard Victoria Azarenka #16 6-3 6-1 Sara Errani #41 Match data
Oct 9, 2008* Moscow WTA 1000 R32 Hard Sara Errani #43 1-6 6-4 6-3 Victoria Azarenka #17 Match data
Apr 9, 2008* Amelia Island WTA 500 R64 Clay Victoria Azarenka #28 3-6 7-5 6-4 Sara Errani #65 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Sara Errani #461 #5 5,835 2,024 384 299 56.2% 0 1 0 0 8 9
Victoria Azarenka #449 #1 10,955 2,203 575 266 68.4% 2 10 0 6 3 21

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Sara Errani Victoria Azarenka
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 2005 3–2 60.0% #152 1,524 0 0
16 2006 9–12 42.9% #92 1,570 0 0
17 2007 30–16 65.2% #30 1,815 0 0
18 2008 38–19 66.7% #15 1,870 0 0
19 2006 3–3 50.0% #174 1,529 0 0 2009 45–15 75.0% #7 1,933 0 3
20 2007 10–7 58.8% #69 1,615 0 0 2010 42–20 67.7% #10 1,945 0 5
21 2008 29–21 58.0% #42 1,747 0 2 2011 55–18 75.3% #3 2,003 0 8
22 2009 25–27 48.1% #47 1,656 0 2 2012 64–11 85.3% #1 2,134 1 14
23 2010 36–29 55.4% #43 1,720 0 2 2013 43–12 78.2% #2 2,068 2 17
24 2011 30–26 53.6% #45 1,671 0 2 2014 15–9 62.5% #31 1,946 2 17
25 2012 53–19 73.6% #6 1,901 0 6 2015 31–14 68.9% #22 1,954 2 17
26 2013 46–22 67.6% #7 1,894 0 7 2016 24–5 82.8% #13 1,979 2 20
27 2014 35–23 60.3% #14 1,773 0 7 2017 4–2 66.7% #205 1,962 2 20
28 2015 46–26 63.9% #20 1,752 0 8 2018 17–12 58.6% #51 1,873 2 20
29 2016 18–21 46.2% #49 1,625 0 9 2019 21–17 55.3% #50 1,846 2 20
30 2017 17–15 53.1% #144 1,650 0 9 2020 19–6 76.0% #13 1,966 2 21
31 2018 6–8 42.9% #112 1,765 0 9 2021 29–14 67.4% #27 1,977 2 21
32 2019 3–7 30.0% #198 1,567 0 9 2022 24–14 63.2% #26 1,921 2 21
33 2020 4–3 57.1% #131 1,604 0 9 2023 23–21 52.3% #22 1,779 2 21
34 2021 8–11 42.1% #121 1,579 0 9 2024 30–15 66.7% #20 1,895 2 21
35 2022 2–6 25.0% #109 1,597 0 9 2025 9–12 42.9% #132 1,828 2 21
36 2023 3–10 23.1% #105 1,550 0 9
37 2024 10–13 43.5% #105 1,699 0 9
38 2025 0–2 0.0% #461 1,594 0 9