H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 16:32 UTC
Sara Errani vs Victoria Azarenka H2H: 2-7
Victoria Azarenka holds a 7–2 lead over Sara Errani in their WTA head-to-head. Across 9 main-draw meetings, Victoria Azarenka leads 3–2 on hard courts and 4–0 on clay. Most recently, Sara Errani won the 2015 Toronto fourth round 7-5 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ITA
Age 39
Right-Handed
164 cm / 5'5"
H2H
2
–
7
9 main draw meetings
BLR
Age 36
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 14, 2015* | Toronto | WTA 1000 | R16 | Hard | Sara Errani | 7-5 6-3 | Victoria Azarenka | Match data |
| Oct 21, 2013 | WTA Championships | WTA Finals | RR | Hard | Victoria Azarenka | 7-6(4) 6-2 | Sara Errani | Match data |
| May 18, 2013* | Rome | WTA 1000 | SF | Clay | Victoria Azarenka | 6-0 7-5 | Sara Errani | Match data |
| Feb 16, 2013* | Doha | WTA 1000 | QF | Hard | Victoria Azarenka | 6-2 6-2 | Sara Errani | Match data |
| May 12, 2011* | Rome | WTA 1000 | R32 | Clay | Victoria Azarenka | 6-1 6-2 | Sara Errani | Match data |
| Apr 9, 2011* | Marbella | WTA 250 | SF | Clay | Victoria Azarenka | 6-2 6-1 | Sara Errani | Match data |
| Jan 10, 2009* | Brisbane | WTA 500 | SF | Hard | Victoria Azarenka | 6-3 6-1 | Sara Errani | Match data |
| Oct 9, 2008* | Moscow | WTA 1000 | R32 | Hard | Sara Errani | 1-6 6-4 6-3 | Victoria Azarenka | Match data |
| Apr 9, 2008* | Amelia Island | WTA 500 | R64 | Clay | Victoria Azarenka | 3-6 7-5 6-4 | Sara Errani | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sara Errani | #461 | #5 | 5,835 | 2,024 | 384 | 299 | 56.2% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 8 | 9 |
| Victoria Azarenka | #449 | #1 | 10,955 | 2,203 | 575 | 266 | 68.4% | 2 | 10 | 0 | 6 | 3 | 21 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Sara Errani | Victoria Azarenka | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2005 | 3–2 | 60.0% | #152 | 1,524 | 0 | 0 |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2006 | 9–12 | 42.9% | #92 | 1,570 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2007 | 30–16 | 65.2% | #30 | 1,815 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2008 | 38–19 | 66.7% | #15 | 1,870 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2006 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #174 | 1,529 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 45–15 | 75.0% | #7 | 1,933 | 0 | 3 |
| 20 | 2007 | 10–7 | 58.8% | #69 | 1,615 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 42–20 | 67.7% | #10 | 1,945 | 0 | 5 |
| 21 | 2008 | 29–21 | 58.0% | #42 | 1,747 | 0 | 2 | 2011 | 55–18 | 75.3% | #3 | 2,003 | 0 | 8 |
| 22 | 2009 | 25–27 | 48.1% | #47 | 1,656 | 0 | 2 | 2012 | 64–11 | 85.3% | #1 | 2,134 | 1 | 14 |
| 23 | 2010 | 36–29 | 55.4% | #43 | 1,720 | 0 | 2 | 2013 | 43–12 | 78.2% | #2 | 2,068 | 2 | 17 |
| 24 | 2011 | 30–26 | 53.6% | #45 | 1,671 | 0 | 2 | 2014 | 15–9 | 62.5% | #31 | 1,946 | 2 | 17 |
| 25 | 2012 | 53–19 | 73.6% | #6 | 1,901 | 0 | 6 | 2015 | 31–14 | 68.9% | #22 | 1,954 | 2 | 17 |
| 26 | 2013 | 46–22 | 67.6% | #7 | 1,894 | 0 | 7 | 2016 | 24–5 | 82.8% | #13 | 1,979 | 2 | 20 |
| 27 | 2014 | 35–23 | 60.3% | #14 | 1,773 | 0 | 7 | 2017 | 4–2 | 66.7% | #205 | 1,962 | 2 | 20 |
| 28 | 2015 | 46–26 | 63.9% | #20 | 1,752 | 0 | 8 | 2018 | 17–12 | 58.6% | #51 | 1,873 | 2 | 20 |
| 29 | 2016 | 18–21 | 46.2% | #49 | 1,625 | 0 | 9 | 2019 | 21–17 | 55.3% | #50 | 1,846 | 2 | 20 |
| 30 | 2017 | 17–15 | 53.1% | #144 | 1,650 | 0 | 9 | 2020 | 19–6 | 76.0% | #13 | 1,966 | 2 | 21 |
| 31 | 2018 | 6–8 | 42.9% | #112 | 1,765 | 0 | 9 | 2021 | 29–14 | 67.4% | #27 | 1,977 | 2 | 21 |
| 32 | 2019 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #198 | 1,567 | 0 | 9 | 2022 | 24–14 | 63.2% | #26 | 1,921 | 2 | 21 |
| 33 | 2020 | 4–3 | 57.1% | #131 | 1,604 | 0 | 9 | 2023 | 23–21 | 52.3% | #22 | 1,779 | 2 | 21 |
| 34 | 2021 | 8–11 | 42.1% | #121 | 1,579 | 0 | 9 | 2024 | 30–15 | 66.7% | #20 | 1,895 | 2 | 21 |
| 35 | 2022 | 2–6 | 25.0% | #109 | 1,597 | 0 | 9 | 2025 | 9–12 | 42.9% | #132 | 1,828 | 2 | 21 |
| 36 | 2023 | 3–10 | 23.1% | #105 | 1,550 | 0 | 9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 37 | 2024 | 10–13 | 43.5% | #105 | 1,699 | 0 | 9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 38 | 2025 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #461 | 1,594 | 0 | 9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |