H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Sara Errani vs Yaroslava Shvedova H2H: 3-3

Sara Errani and Yaroslava Shvedova are tied 3–3 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 6 main-draw meetings, Sara Errani leads 2–1 on clay, while they are tied 1–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Sara Errani won the 2016 Charleston third round 6-0 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Sara Errani
ITA Age 39 Right-Handed 164 cm / 5'5"
H2H
3 – 3
6 main draw meetings
Yaroslava Shvedova
KAZ Age 38 Right-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Apr 7, 2016* Charleston WTA 500 R32 Clay Sara Errani #20 6-0 6-3 Yaroslava Shvedova #70 Match data
Feb 18, 2016* Dubai WTA 1000 R16 Hard Sara Errani #22 6-3 6-0 Yaroslava Shvedova #82 Match data
Jul 1, 2012* Wimbledon Grand Slam R32 Grass Yaroslava Shvedova #65 6-0 6-4 Sara Errani #10 Match data
Mar 22, 2011* Miami WTA 1000 R128 Hard Yaroslava Shvedova #42 6-3 5-7 7-6(5) Sara Errani #40 Match data
May 25, 2010* Roland Garros Grand Slam R128 Clay Yaroslava Shvedova #36 6-1 7-5 Sara Errani #33 Match data
Jul 18, 2009* Palermo WTA 250 QF Clay Sara Errani #47 6-2 7-5 Yaroslava Shvedova #65 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Sara Errani #461 #5 5,835 2,024 384 299 56.2% 0 1 0 0 8 9
Yaroslava Shvedova #1,136 #25 1,860 1,751 141 175 44.6% 0 0 0 1 0 1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Sara Errani Yaroslava Shvedova
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 — — — — — — — 2005 1–1 50.0% #292 1,513 0 0
18 — — — — — — — 2006 1–2 33.3% #138 1,508 0 0
19 2006 3–3 50.0% #174 1,529 0 0 2007 10–14 41.7% #84 1,492 0 1
20 2007 10–7 58.8% #69 1,615 0 0 2008 6–13 31.6% #92 1,470 0 1
21 2008 29–21 58.0% #42 1,747 0 2 2009 18–17 51.4% #51 1,601 0 1
22 2009 25–27 48.1% #47 1,656 0 2 2010 23–22 51.1% #39 1,665 0 1
23 2010 36–29 55.4% #43 1,720 0 2 2011 6–13 31.6% #204 1,576 0 1
24 2011 30–26 53.6% #45 1,671 0 2 2012 16–12 57.1% #29 1,688 0 1
25 2012 53–19 73.6% #6 1,901 0 6 2013 10–15 40.0% #79 1,632 0 1
26 2013 46–22 67.6% #7 1,894 0 7 2014 16–15 51.6% #65 1,640 0 1
27 2014 35–23 60.3% #14 1,773 0 7 2015 13–14 48.1% #67 1,615 0 1
28 2015 46–26 63.9% #20 1,752 0 8 2016 16–16 50.0% #37 1,700 0 1
29 2016 18–21 46.2% #49 1,625 0 9 2017 4–11 26.7% #289 1,598 0 1
30 2017 17–15 53.1% #144 1,650 0 9 — — — — — — —
31 2018 6–8 42.9% #112 1,765 0 9 — — — — — — —
32 2019 3–7 30.0% #198 1,567 0 9 2020 0–1 0.0% — 1,587 0 1
33 2020 4–3 57.1% #131 1,604 0 9 2021 1–9 10.0% #434 1,493 0 1
34 2021 8–11 42.1% #121 1,579 0 9 — — — — — — —
35 2022 2–6 25.0% #109 1,597 0 9 — — — — — — —
36 2023 3–10 23.1% #105 1,550 0 9 — — — — — — —
37 2024 10–13 43.5% #105 1,699 0 9 — — — — — — —
38 2025 0–2 0.0% #461 1,594 0 9 — — — — — — —