H2H data updated: 2026-07-25 23:01 UTC
Sara Sorribes Tormo vs Ashleigh Barty H2H: 1-0
Sara Sorribes Tormo holds a 1–0 lead over Ashleigh Barty in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Sara Sorribes Tormo leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Sara Sorribes Tormo won the 2021 Tokyo Olympics second round 6-4 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ESP
Age 29
Right-Handed
176 cm / 5'9"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
AUS
Age 30
Right-Handed
166 cm / 5'5"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 26, 2021* | Tokyo Olympics | Olympics | R64 | Hard | Sara Sorribes Tormo | 6-4 6-3 | Ashleigh Barty | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sara Sorribes Tormo | #212 | #32 | 1,760 | 1,853 | 146 | 148 | 49.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Ashleigh Barty | #1 | #1 | 10,185 | 2,178 | 191 | 71 | 72.9% | 3 | 3 | 2 | 4 | 3 | 15 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Sara Sorribes Tormo | Ashleigh Barty | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2012 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #175 | 1,469 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2013 | 4–5 | 44.4% | #190 | 1,519 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 2015 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #181 | 1,508 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 1–6 | 14.3% | #223 | 1,509 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2016 | 6–9 | 40.0% | #107 | 1,540 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2017 | 15–18 | 45.5% | #104 | 1,593 | 0 | 0 | 2016 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #272 | 1,595 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2018 | 7–13 | 35.0% | #86 | 1,587 | 0 | 0 | 2017 | 30–14 | 68.2% | #17 | 1,891 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 2019 | 14–19 | 42.4% | #84 | 1,644 | 0 | 0 | 2018 | 40–18 | 69.0% | #15 | 1,968 | 0 | 3 |
| 23 | 2020 | 7–12 | 36.8% | #66 | 1,678 | 0 | 0 | 2019 | 48–12 | 80.0% | #1 | 2,071 | 1 | 7 |
| 24 | 2021 | 33–19 | 63.5% | #36 | 1,774 | 0 | 1 | 2020 | 12–3 | 80.0% | #1 | 2,075 | 1 | 8 |
| 25 | 2022 | 23–18 | 56.1% | #61 | 1,737 | 0 | 1 | 2021 | 43–8 | 84.3% | #1 | 2,115 | 2 | 13 |
| 26 | 2023 | 19–9 | 67.9% | #48 | 1,779 | 0 | 2 | 2022 | 11–0 | 100.0% | #1 | 2,178 | 3 | 15 |
| 27 | 2024 | 17–20 | 45.9% | #106 | 1,705 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2025 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #290 | 1,616 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2026 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #212 | 1,636 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |