H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 04:32 UTC
Sara Sorribes Tormo vs Denisa Satralova H2H: 1-0
Sara Sorribes Tormo holds a 1–0 lead over Denisa Satralova in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Sara Sorribes Tormo leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Sara Sorribes Tormo won the 2017 Bogota third round 6-1 7-6(4).
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ESP
Age 29
Right-Handed
176 cm / 5'9"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
CZE
Age 33
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 12, 2017* | Bogota | WTA 250 | R32 | Clay | Sara Sorribes Tormo | 6-1 7-6(4) | Denisa Satralova | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sara Sorribes Tormo | #212 | #32 | 1,760 | 1,857 | 144 | 145 | 49.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Denisa Satralova | #823 | #55 | 1,029 | 1,726 | 43 | 47 | 47.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Sara Sorribes Tormo | Denisa Satralova | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 2015 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #181 | 1,508 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2016 | 6–9 | 40.0% | #107 | 1,540 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2017 | 15–18 | 45.5% | #104 | 1,594 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2018 | 7–13 | 35.0% | #86 | 1,587 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 3–1 | 75.0% | #108 | 1,555 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2019 | 14–19 | 42.4% | #84 | 1,643 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 15–11 | 57.7% | #62 | 1,677 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2020 | 7–12 | 36.8% | #66 | 1,679 | 0 | 0 | 2016 | 15–15 | 50.0% | #92 | 1,681 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2021 | 31–18 | 63.3% | #36 | 1,774 | 0 | 1 | 2017 | 4–11 | 26.7% | #130 | 1,564 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2022 | 23–18 | 56.1% | #61 | 1,738 | 0 | 1 | 2018 | 5–5 | 50.0% | #153 | 1,601 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2023 | 19–9 | 67.9% | #48 | 1,789 | 0 | 2 | 2019 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #224 | 1,559 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2024 | 17–19 | 47.2% | #106 | 1,710 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2025 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #290 | 1,618 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2026 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #212 | 1,651 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |