H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 04:32 UTC
Sara Sorribes Tormo vs Lara Arruabarrena H2H: 1-2
Lara Arruabarrena holds a 2–1 lead over Sara Sorribes Tormo in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Lara Arruabarrena leads 2–1 on clay. Most recently, Sara Sorribes Tormo won the 2019 Madrid second round 6-4 3-6 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ESP
Age 29
Right-Handed
176 cm / 5'9"
H2H
1
–
2
3 main draw meetings
ESP
Age 34
Right-Handed
166 cm / 5'5"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 6, 2019 | Madrid | WTA 1000 | R64 | Clay | Sara Sorribes Tormo | 6-4 3-6 6-1 | Lara Arruabarrena | Match data |
| Apr 13, 2018* | Bogota | WTA 250 | R16 | Clay | Lara Arruabarrena | 6-0 6-1 | Sara Sorribes Tormo | Match data |
| Apr 15, 2017* | Bogota | WTA 250 | SF | Clay | Lara Arruabarrena | 6-2 4-6 6-4 | Sara Sorribes Tormo | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sara Sorribes Tormo | #212 | #32 | 1,760 | 1,857 | 144 | 145 | 49.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Lara Arruabarrena | #1,062 | #52 | 1,083 | 1,722 | 99 | 120 | 45.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Sara Sorribes Tormo | Lara Arruabarrena | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 2015 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #181 | 1,508 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2016 | 6–9 | 40.0% | #107 | 1,540 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 3–2 | 60.0% | #170 | 1,534 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2017 | 15–18 | 45.5% | #104 | 1,594 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 8–7 | 53.3% | #79 | 1,598 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | 2018 | 7–13 | 35.0% | #86 | 1,587 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 8–11 | 42.1% | #102 | 1,605 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 2019 | 14–19 | 42.4% | #84 | 1,643 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 10–11 | 47.6% | #88 | 1,609 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 2020 | 7–12 | 36.8% | #66 | 1,679 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 15–17 | 46.9% | #86 | 1,615 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 2021 | 31–18 | 63.3% | #36 | 1,774 | 0 | 1 | 2016 | 17–15 | 53.1% | #66 | 1,678 | 0 | 2 |
| 25 | 2022 | 23–18 | 56.1% | #61 | 1,738 | 0 | 1 | 2017 | 14–19 | 42.4% | #84 | 1,625 | 0 | 2 |
| 26 | 2023 | 19–9 | 67.9% | #48 | 1,789 | 0 | 2 | 2018 | 13–19 | 40.6% | #82 | 1,573 | 0 | 2 |
| 27 | 2024 | 17–19 | 47.2% | #106 | 1,710 | 0 | 2 | 2019 | 8–13 | 38.1% | #155 | 1,536 | 0 | 2 |
| 28 | 2025 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #290 | 1,618 | 0 | 2 | 2020 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #165 | 1,543 | 0 | 2 |
| 29 | 2026 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #212 | 1,651 | 0 | 2 | 2021 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #220 | 1,508 | 0 | 2 |