H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Sara Sorribes Tormo vs Nuria Parrizas Diaz H2H: 1-2
Nuria Parrizas Diaz holds a 2–1 lead over Sara Sorribes Tormo in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on clay, while Nuria Parrizas Diaz leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Nuria Parrizas Diaz won the 2022 Rome second round 1-6 3-4 RET.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ESP
Age 29
Right-Handed
176 cm / 5'9"
H2H
1
–
2
3 main draw meetings
ESP
Age 35
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 11, 2022* | Rome | WTA 1000 | R64 | Clay | Nuria Parrizas Diaz | 1-6 3-4 (ret.) | Sara Sorribes Tormo | Match data |
| May 10, 2022 | Rome | WTA 1000 | R64 | Clay | Sara Sorribes Tormo | 6-1 4-3 | Nuria Parrizas Diaz | Match data |
| Mar 5, 2022* | Monterrey | WTA 500 | QF | Hard | Nuria Parrizas Diaz | 6-3 1-6 6-4 | Sara Sorribes Tormo | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sara Sorribes Tormo | #212 | #32 | 1,760 | 1,857 | 144 | 145 | 49.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Nuria Parrizas Diaz | #323 | #45 | 1,190 | 1,744 | 40 | 61 | 39.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Sara Sorribes Tormo | Nuria Parrizas Diaz | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 2015 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #181 | 1,508 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2016 | 6–9 | 40.0% | #107 | 1,540 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2017 | 15–18 | 45.5% | #104 | 1,594 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2018 | 7–13 | 35.0% | #86 | 1,587 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2019 | 14–19 | 42.4% | #84 | 1,643 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 2020 | 7–12 | 36.8% | #66 | 1,679 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 2021 | 31–18 | 63.3% | #36 | 1,774 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 2022 | 23–18 | 56.1% | #61 | 1,738 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 2023 | 19–9 | 67.9% | #48 | 1,789 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 2024 | 17–19 | 47.2% | #106 | 1,710 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2025 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #290 | 1,618 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2026 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #212 | 1,651 | 0 | 2 | 2021 | 5–8 | 38.5% | #66 | 1,618 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2022 | 19–26 | 42.2% | #70 | 1,591 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2023 | 12–16 | 42.9% | #125 | 1,640 | 0 | 0 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2024 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #91 | 1,642 | 0 | 0 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2025 | 1–7 | 12.5% | #216 | 1,535 | 0 | 0 |