H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Serena Williams vs Justine Henin H2H: 8-6
Serena Williams holds a 8–6 lead over Justine Henin in their WTA head-to-head. Across 14 main-draw meetings, Serena Williams leads 5–1 on hard courts, while Justine Henin leads 4–1 on clay. Most recently, Serena Williams won the 2010 Australian Open final 6-4 3-6 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 44
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
8
–
6
14 main draw meetings
BEL
Age 44
Right-Handed
167 cm / 5'6"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 30, 2010* | Australian Open | Grand Slam | F | Hard | Serena Williams | 6-4 3-6 6-2 | Justine Henin | Match data |
| Mar 29, 2008* | Miami | WTA 1000 | QF | Hard | Serena Williams | 6-2 6-0 | Justine Henin | Match data |
| Sep 6, 2007* | US Open | Grand Slam | QF | Hard | Justine Henin | 7-6(3) 6-1 | Serena Williams | Match data |
| Jul 5, 2007* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | QF | Grass | Justine Henin | 6-4 3-6 6-3 | Serena Williams | Match data |
| Jun 6, 2007* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | QF | Clay | Justine Henin | 6-4 6-3 | Serena Williams | Match data |
| Mar 25, 2007* | Miami | WTA 1000 | F | Hard | Serena Williams | 0-6 7-5 6-3 | Justine Henin | Match data |
| Jul 6, 2003* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | SF | Grass | Serena Williams | 6-3 6-2 | Justine Henin | Match data |
| Jun 7, 2003* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | SF | Clay | Justine Henin | 6-2 4-6 7-5 | Serena Williams | Match data |
| Apr 13, 2003* | Charleston | WTA 1000 | F | Clay | Justine Henin | 6-3 6-4 | Serena Williams | Match data |
| Sep 28, 2002* | Leipzig | WTA 500 | SF | Carpet | Serena Williams | 6-4 6-2 | Justine Henin | Match data |
| May 19, 2002* | Rome | WTA 1000 | F | Clay | Serena Williams | 7-6(6) 6-4 | Justine Henin | Match data |
| May 12, 2002* | Berlin | WTA 1000 | F | Clay | Justine Henin | 6-2 1-6 7-6(5) | Serena Williams | Match data |
| Nov 5, 2001* | WTA Tour Championships | WTA Finals | QF | Hard | Serena Williams | 6-3 7-6(5) | Justine Henin | Match data |
| Sep 4, 2001* | US Open | Grand Slam | R16 | Hard | Serena Williams | 7-5 6-0 | Justine Henin | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Serena Williams | #320 | #1 | 13,615 | 2,405 | 825 | 170 | 82.9% | 23 | 23 | 5 | 17 | 3 | 71 |
| Justine Henin | #13 | #1 | 7,626 | 2,384 | 442 | 102 | 81.2% | 7 | 10 | 2 | 18 | 5 | 42 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Serena Williams | Justine Henin | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | 1997 | 3–2 | 60.0% | #101 | 1,582 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | 1998 | 26–11 | 70.3% | #20 | 1,895 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 1999 | 37–7 | 84.1% | #4 | 2,170 | 1 | 4 | 1999 | 11–6 | 64.7% | #69 | 1,655 | 0 | 1 |
| 18 | 2000 | 37–8 | 82.2% | #6 | 2,174 | 1 | 7 | 2000 | 17–13 | 56.7% | #45 | 1,748 | 0 | 1 |
| 19 | 2001 | 40–7 | 85.1% | #6 | 2,259 | 1 | 10 | 2001 | 56–18 | 75.7% | #7 | 1,982 | 0 | 4 |
| 20 | 2002 | 57–5 | 91.9% | #1 | 2,348 | 4 | 18 | 2002 | 50–21 | 70.4% | #5 | 2,003 | 0 | 6 |
| 21 | 2003 | 36–3 | 92.3% | #3 | 2,369 | 6 | 22 | 2003 | 73–11 | 86.9% | #1 | 2,211 | 2 | 14 |
| 22 | 2004 | 39–11 | 78.0% | #7 | 2,192 | 6 | 24 | 2004 | 30–4 | 88.2% | #8 | 2,201 | 3 | 18 |
| 23 | 2005 | 21–9 | 70.0% | #11 | 2,028 | 7 | 25 | 2005 | 34–5 | 87.2% | #6 | 2,199 | 4 | 22 |
| 24 | 2006 | 12–4 | 75.0% | #95 | 2,016 | 7 | 25 | 2006 | 57–8 | 87.7% | #1 | 2,276 | 5 | 28 |
| 25 | 2007 | 34–10 | 77.3% | #7 | 2,058 | 8 | 27 | 2007 | 63–4 | 94.0% | #1 | 2,373 | 7 | 38 |
| 26 | 2008 | 41–8 | 83.7% | #2 | 2,109 | 9 | 31 | 2008 | 17–4 | 81.0% | #1 | 2,278 | 7 | 40 |
| 27 | 2009 | 50–13 | 79.4% | #1 | 2,106 | 11 | 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2010 | 25–4 | 86.2% | #4 | 2,149 | 13 | 36 | 2010 | 32–7 | 82.1% | #12 | 2,199 | 7 | 42 |
| 29 | 2011 | 22–4 | 84.6% | #12 | 2,155 | 13 | 38 | 2011 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #13 | 2,173 | 7 | 42 |
| 30 | 2012 | 48–6 | 88.9% | #3 | 2,239 | 15 | 44 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2013 | 77–5 | 93.9% | #1 | 2,345 | 17 | 55 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 2014 | 52–10 | 83.9% | #1 | 2,209 | 18 | 62 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 2015 | 50–6 | 89.3% | #1 | 2,197 | 21 | 67 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 34 | 2016 | 36–5 | 87.8% | #2 | 2,177 | 22 | 69 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 35 | 2017 | 8–1 | 88.9% | #22 | 2,172 | 23 | 70 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 36 | 2018 | 18–7 | 72.0% | #16 | 2,078 | 23 | 70 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 37 | 2019 | 25–8 | 75.8% | #10 | 2,052 | 23 | 70 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 38 | 2020 | 16–5 | 76.2% | #11 | 1,991 | 23 | 71 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 39 | 2021 | 12–6 | 66.7% | #41 | 1,950 | 23 | 71 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 40 | 2022 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #320 | 1,891 | 23 | 71 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 44 | 2026 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #320 | — | 23 | 71 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |