H2H data updated: 2026-10-29 00:00 UTC

Serena Williams vs Marina Erakovic H2H: 1-0

Serena Williams holds a 1–0 lead over Marina Erakovic in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Serena Williams leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Serena Williams won the 2012 Charleston Open round of 16 6-2 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Serena Williams
USA Age 45 Right-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
1 – 0
1 main-draw meetings
Marina Erakovic
New Zealand Age 38 Right-Handed 174 cm / 5'9"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Serena Williams #10 6-2 6-2 Marina Erakovic #45 Match data Apr 6, 2012* R16 Charleston Open Premier → modern equivalent WTA 500 Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS Olympics 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Serena Williams — #1 13,615 2,399 837 172 83.0% 23 1 23 6 18 2 73
Marina Erakovic — #39 1,392 1,695 104 133 43.9% 0 0 0 0 0 1 1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Serena Williams Marina Erakovic
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 1997 3–2 60.0% #101 1,582 0 0 — — — — — — —
16 1998 26–11 70.3% #20 1,893 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 1999 38–7 84.4% #4 2,189 1 5 2005 1–1 50.0% #213 1,498 0 0
18 2000 37–8 82.2% #6 2,184 1 8 — — — — — — —
19 2001 40–7 85.1% #6 2,237 1 11 2007 1–5 16.7% #153 1,457 0 0
20 2002 57–5 91.9% #1 2,339 4 19 2008 16–17 48.5% #66 1,517 0 0
21 2003 36–3 92.3% #3 2,365 6 23 2009 4–7 36.4% #227 1,514 0 0
22 2004 39–11 78.0% #7 2,225 6 25 2010 2–7 22.2% #333 1,480 0 0
23 2005 21–9 70.0% #11 2,101 7 26 2011 11–8 57.9% #61 1,627 0 0
24 2006 12–4 75.0% #95 2,063 7 26 2012 19–21 47.5% #66 1,583 0 0
25 2007 34–10 77.3% #7 2,078 8 28 2013 20–16 55.6% #46 1,670 0 1
26 2008 44–9 83.0% #2 2,126 9 32 2014 12–20 37.5% #76 1,607 0 1
27 2009 50–13 79.4% #1 2,120 11 35 2015 7–14 33.3% #135 1,542 0 1
28 2010 25–4 86.2% #4 2,159 13 37 2016 10–8 55.6% #106 1,620 0 1
29 2011 22–4 84.6% #12 2,182 13 39 2017 1–9 10.0% #197 1,547 0 1
30 2012 54–6 90.0% #3 2,302 15 46 — — — — — — —
31 2013 77–5 93.9% #1 2,383 17 57 — — — — — — —
32 2014 52–10 83.9% #1 2,272 18 64 — — — — — — —
33 2015 50–6 89.3% #1 2,293 21 69 — — — — — — —
34 2016 38–6 86.4% #2 2,208 22 71 — — — — — — —
35 2017 8–1 88.9% #22 2,201 23 72 — — — — — — —
36 2018 18–7 72.0% #16 2,112 23 72 — — — — — — —
37 2019 25–8 75.8% #10 2,094 23 72 — — — — — — —
38 2020 16–5 76.2% #11 2,045 23 73 — — — — — — —
39 2021 12–6 66.7% #41 1,994 23 73 — — — — — — —
40 2022 3–4 42.9% — 1,926 23 73 — — — — — — —
44 2026 0–1 0.0% — 1,899 23 73 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Serena Williams Marina Erakovic
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
15 1997 — — — — — — — — — — — — 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 1998 16 7 23 69.6% 6 2 8 75.0% 4 2 6 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1999 27 4 31 87.1% 6 3 9 66.7% — — — — 5 0 5 100.0% 2005 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 2000 29 5 34 85.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 5 1 6 83.3% 3 1 4 75.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2001 32 5 37 86.5% 4 1 5 80.0% 4 1 5 80.0% — — — — 2007 1 5 6 16.7% — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 2002 28 3 31 90.3% 18 2 20 90.0% 7 0 7 100.0% 4 0 4 100.0% 2008 8 11 19 42.1% 1 3 4 25.0% 7 3 10 70.0% — — — —
21 2003 13 0 13 100.0% 12 3 15 80.0% 7 0 7 100.0% 4 0 4 100.0% 2009 4 7 11 36.4% — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 2004 23 6 29 79.3% 10 4 14 71.4% 6 1 7 85.7% — — — — 2010 0 6 6 0.0% — — — — 2 1 3 66.7% — — — —
23 2005 16 5 21 76.2% 2 2 4 50.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 1 1 2 50.0% 2011 7 5 12 58.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 4 2 6 66.7% — — — —
24 2006 12 4 16 75.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2012 9 10 19 47.4% 7 7 14 50.0% 3 4 7 42.9% — — — —
25 2007 24 6 30 80.0% 6 3 9 66.7% 4 1 5 80.0% — — — — 2013 13 10 23 56.5% 3 4 7 42.9% 4 2 6 66.7% — — — —
26 2008 27 5 32 84.4% 11 3 14 78.6% 6 1 7 85.7% — — — — 2014 10 13 23 43.5% 2 3 5 40.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
27 2009 36 8 44 81.8% 4 4 8 50.0% 7 0 7 100.0% 3 1 4 75.0% 2015 5 6 11 45.5% 0 4 4 0.0% 2 4 6 33.3% — — — —
28 2010 10 1 11 90.9% 8 3 11 72.7% 7 0 7 100.0% — — — — 2016 1 3 4 25.0% 7 4 11 63.6% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — —
29 2011 18 2 20 90.0% — — — — 4 2 6 66.7% — — — — 2017 1 6 7 14.3% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
30 2012 26 4 30 86.7% 15 2 17 88.2% 13 0 13 100.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2013 46 4 50 92.0% 28 0 28 100.0% 3 1 4 75.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2014 41 6 47 87.2% 9 3 12 75.0% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2015 30 3 33 90.9% 13 3 16 81.3% 7 0 7 100.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2016 20 5 25 80.0% 11 1 12 91.7% 7 0 7 100.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2017 8 1 9 88.9% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 2018 9 5 14 64.3% 3 1 4 75.0% 6 1 7 85.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
37 2019 16 5 21 76.2% 3 2 5 60.0% 6 1 7 85.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
38 2020 15 4 19 78.9% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
39 2021 8 2 10 80.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
40 2022 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
44 2026 — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 533 103 636 83.8% 174 47 221 78.7% 107 17 124 86.3% 23 5 28 82.1% — 60 83 143 42.0% 20 28 48 41.7% 24 21 45 53.3% 0 1 1 0.0%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 633/768 of Serena Williams's and 219/235 of Marina Erakovic's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Serena Williams Marina Erakovic
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
19 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2007 5/6 2.4 3.6 56.9% 62.4% 42.7% 39.4% 61.3% 54.4% 41.8%
20 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2008 29/33 5.4 3.4 58.8% 68.1% 47.4% 54.2% 45.7% 59.3% 40.8%
21 2003 13/39 3.9 2.1 61.7% 74.0% 52.8% 63.9% 58.8% 66.1% 51.8% 2009 11/11 3.8 4.9 57.0% 64.8% 38.5% 56.9% 55.6% 53.7% 40.2%
22 2004 16/50 6.4 2.6 61.3% 73.3% 51.5% 64.8% 54.6% 64.9% 49.7% 2010 9/9 4.7 4.1 61.1% 62.6% 41.2% 53.6% 51.8% 54.2% 37.6%
23 2005 14/30 5.9 2.6 61.2% 74.1% 52.5% 68.0% 48.3% 65.1% 47.5% 2011 18/19 4.4 3.1 63.9% 65.5% 44.4% 59.2% 39.3% 58.1% 42.5%
24 2006 15/16 6.3 2.9 59.3% 74.2% 47.4% 54.7% 58.2% 63.1% 46.9% 2012 38/40 3.8 3.4 54.4% 68.8% 46.5% 53.9% 42.7% 58.3% 42.6%
25 2007 42/44 6.1 2.6 59.4% 69.2% 48.1% 58.2% 57.3% 60.8% 46.0% 2013 29/36 4.2 4.9 57.0% 70.7% 45.0% 51.7% 47.3% 59.7% 44.4%
26 2008 44/53 6.8 2.7 61.4% 73.4% 45.2% 60.0% 47.6% 62.7% 47.7% 2014 31/32 2.8 3.8 60.3% 65.6% 42.5% 49.3% 46.9% 56.3% 41.9%
27 2009 57/63 6.2 2.8 60.8% 75.0% 50.7% 54.5% 48.2% 65.3% 46.2% 2015 21/21 3.8 3.6 61.0% 66.3% 50.9% 53.1% 41.0% 60.4% 38.0%
28 2010 29/29 8.6 2.9 62.3% 77.4% 47.5% 66.0% 51.5% 66.4% 46.8% 2016 18/18 2.3 4.4 64.7% 61.7% 44.5% 51.8% 50.1% 56.1% 43.0%
29 2011 25/26 8.0 2.5 59.0% 79.5% 53.0% 67.2% 50.8% 68.7% 46.9% 2017 10/10 2.0 5.6 57.0% 65.1% 39.1% 48.2% 43.8% 54.1% 36.1%
30 2012 48/60 8.2 2.3 59.0% 78.7% 54.8% 66.6% 53.2% 68.8% 49.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
31 2013 74/82 6.1 2.2 63.0% 76.5% 53.5% 60.3% 56.0% 68.1% 52.4% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
32 2014 56/62 7.7 3.5 59.3% 76.5% 51.6% 64.4% 52.8% 66.3% 48.9% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
33 2015 50/56 9.5 3.5 59.9% 76.7% 55.9% 67.3% 54.5% 68.4% 47.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
34 2016 41/44 7.9 2.8 62.3% 77.4% 51.9% 58.8% 50.6% 68.0% 49.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
35 2017 9/9 7.9 3.9 55.9% 79.6% 46.7% 57.9% 51.3% 65.7% 46.5% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
36 2018 24/25 7.1 3.4 59.2% 74.2% 48.5% 55.3% 51.9% 63.9% 44.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
37 2019 31/33 6.6 2.8 59.2% 76.5% 50.4% 50.4% 45.6% 65.5% 46.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
38 2020 20/21 8.9 2.7 61.3% 73.3% 50.7% 71.0% 49.7% 64.3% 44.9% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
39 2021 17/18 5.1 2.6 57.4% 72.6% 48.9% 43.6% 49.4% 62.4% 46.2% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
40 2022 7/7 8.0 4.7 65.0% 68.0% 35.4% 62.0% 45.8% 56.6% 40.5% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
44 2026 1/1 7.0 7.0 79.0% 62.7% 45.0% 54.6% 27.3% 59.0% 38.2% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 633/1,009 7.2 2.8 60.6% 75.5% 50.9% 60.9% 52.1% 65.8% 48.0% — 219/237 3.8 3.9 59.0% 66.6% 44.9% 52.7% 46.0% 57.7% 41.4%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Serena Williams Marina Erakovic
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
15 1997 1582 144.0 — — — — +41 — — 54.5% +0.82 1–0 1–1 — -0.18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 1998 1893 158.1 — — — — -61 -201 -194 64.6% +1.29 8–5 (62%) 2–3 (40%) 106.2 -1.20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1999 2189 178.2 — — — — +12 -418 — 80.2% +2.10 8–5 (62%) 6–0 (100%) 108.5 -2.69 2005 1498 95.1 — — — — — — — 40.0% -1.00 1–0 — — +0.29
18 2000 2185 168.9 — — — — +24 — -372 80.6% +2.43 6–1 (86%) 4–3 (57%) 102.2 +0.56 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2001 2238 172.8 — — — — +36 -434 -326 79.2% +2.45 7–4 (64%) 5–5 (50%) 100.5 -2.79 2007 1457 98.0 -0.61 -2.50 0.916 48.2% +4 — — 21.4% -1.36 1–1 — — +0.14
20 2002 2339 173.5 — — — — +18 -278 -232 87.1% +2.70 9–3 (75%) 11–1 (92%) 111.5 -2.86 2008 1518 119.1 +1.94 -2.96 1.003 49.8% -44 +13 +209 48.7% -0.08 6–6 (50%) 5–7 (42%) 99.1 +1.05
21 2003 2365 170.4 +7.11 +5.95 1.527 58.7% +80 -218 -130 86.0% +2.74 6–2 (75%) 2–0 — -1.67 2009 1515 109.0 -1.10 -1.98 0.869 47.5% -39 — — 42.3% -0.92 1–3 (25%) 1–0 — -0.07
22 2004 2226 163.6 +6.68 +4.43 1.416 56.9% +107 -102 +86 74.8% +1.90 9–4 (69%) 4–3 (57%) 96.9 -0.38 2010 1481 102.8 -1.18 -3.79 0.820 45.9% -45 — +253 25.0% -1.70 1–1 0–3 (0%) — -0.06
23 2005 2101 150.6 +5.70 +2.41 1.360 56.0% +157 -3 +122 70.0% +1.48 8–0 (100%) 1–6 (14%) 99.2 -0.26 2011 1628 118.5 +1.72 -1.34 1.015 50.1% -75 — +125 55.3% +0.02 5–4 (56%) 1–0 — +0.25
24 2006 2064 147.1 +4.12 +2.38 1.272 54.9% +120 — — 69.4% +1.75 3–1 (75%) 0–3 (0%) 96.2 -0.43 2012 1584 114.0 +1.58 -1.34 1.023 50.5% -11 -32 +125 44.0% -0.37 9–6 (60%) 5–3 (63%) 104.2 +1.89
25 2007 2079 165.4 +4.80 +3.80 1.173 53.4% +88 +11 +153 78.3% +1.84 6–4 (60%) 9–3 (75%) 101.7 -2.35 2013 1670 123.7 +2.86 -0.04 1.101 51.9% -28 -101 +64 53.0% +0.21 7–7 (50%) 10–4 (71%) 106.7 +0.26
26 2008 2127 164.9 +6.89 +4.29 1.280 55.0% +42 -34 +130 80.0% +2.11 9–4 (69%) 5–2 (71%) 102.9 -1.01 2014 1608 123.2 -0.48 -1.04 0.958 49.3% +12 -33 +40 40.8% -0.31 4–5 (44%) 2–2 (50%) — -0.33
27 2009 2121 165.8 +9.20 +3.92 1.332 55.3% +59 -117 +156 75.6% +1.76 11–6 (65%) 8–8 (50%) 98.1 -2.33 2015 1543 117.9 +1.24 -2.64 0.961 48.9% +76 -40 +68 44.7% -0.23 2–7 (22%) 2–3 (40%) 95.1 -0.36
28 2010 2159 157.0 +8.78 +3.86 1.393 56.1% +37 -163 +212 79.1% +2.01 6–3 (67%) 10–2 (83%) 106.5 -1.14 2016 1620 110.9 +0.21 -1.18 0.978 49.7% -22 +11 +15 48.7% -0.26 4–3 (57%) 5–4 (56%) 102.4 +0.55
29 2011 2183 160.3 +9.93 +4.56 1.499 57.5% +57 — +124 78.9% +2.33 6–1 (86%) 3–2 (60%) 101.2 -0.27 2017 1548 105.9 -0.90 -2.01 0.788 45.4% +27 — — 15.8% -1.84 0–1 0–3 (0%) — -0.44
30 2012 2303 168.5 +11.57 +6.33 1.597 58.7% -27 -158 +62 88.2% +2.98 6–1 (86%) 3–2 (60%) 103.3 -2.18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2013 2383 177.8 +12.05 +8.21 1.643 59.9% -1 -39 +41 89.7% +3.22 10–4 (71%) 3–3 (50%) 101.0 -0.70 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2014 2273 171.8 +9.98 +6.05 1.454 57.3% +55 +2 +33 83.6% +2.37 7–3 (70%) 8–0 (100%) 102.4 -0.53 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2015 2293 165.1 +9.57 +5.97 1.514 57.9% +38 -12 +17 81.3% +2.24 17–2 (89%) 7–2 (78%) 105.8 -0.61 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2016 2209 161.7 +10.55 +5.23 1.529 57.9% +30 +121 +135 83.0% +2.39 4–2 (67%) 8–2 (80%) 100.3 -0.68 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2017 2201 137.9 +4.47 +1.79 1.354 56.0% +39 — — 89.5% +2.32 0–1 1–0 — -0.09 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 2018 2112 148.0 +5.23 +2.07 1.220 53.7% +22 +269 +229 71.2% +1.29 3–1 (75%) 3–0 (100%) 102.0 -0.74 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
37 2019 2094 156.8 +7.34 +3.63 1.352 55.6% +42 +283 +271 77.3% +2.05 7–1 (88%) — — -0.12 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
38 2020 2046 143.2 +4.70 +1.29 1.259 54.8% +19 — — 70.6% +1.55 7–4 (64%) 4–3 (57%) 97.0 +0.56 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
39 2021 1994 145.7 +4.15 +2.90 1.229 53.9% +132 +333 — 68.6% +1.54 3–0 (100%) 2–2 (50%) 101.9 -0.19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
40 2022 1926 119.5 +0.06 -0.90 0.934 48.7% +144 — — 47.1% -0.35 1–2 (33%) 2–1 (67%) — +0.04 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
44 2026 1900 99.1 +1.34 -3.02 0.931 47.3% — — — 33.3% -1.67 0–1 1–0 — +0.11 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 2400 174.5 +8.45 +4.78 1.403 56.6% +43 -85 +33 79.6% +2.21 168–65 (72%) 113–57 (66%) 110.9 -2.45 — 1696 119.6 +0.96 -1.64 0.979 49.6% -14 -29 +123 44.6% -0.34 41–44 (48%) 31–29 (52%) 102.9 +1.34

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.