H2H data updated: 2026-09-13 00:00 UTC

Serena Williams vs Na Li H2H: 11-2 (incl. walkovers)

Serena Williams vs Na Li: 11–1 excluding walkovers; 11–2 including 1 walkover. Across 13 main-draw results including walkovers, Serena Williams leads 10–1 on hard courts, while Na Li leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Serena Williams won the 2014 Miami Open final 7-5 6-1.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Serena Williams

USA Age 44 Right-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"

H2H including walkovers

11 – 2

13 main-draw results

Na Li

CHN Age 44 Right-Handed 172 cm / 5'8"

H2H Match Log

Player	Score	Player	Match Data	Date	Round	Tournament	Category	Surface
Serena Williams #1	7-5 6-1	Na Li #2	Match data	Mar 23, 2014*	F	Miami Open	Premier Mandatory → modern equivalent WTA 1000	Hard
Serena Williams #1	2-6 6-3 6-0	Na Li #3	Match data	Oct 29, 2013*	F	WTA Finals	WTA Finals	Hard
Serena Williams #1	6-0 6-3	Na Li #6	Match data	Sep 7, 2013*	SF	US Open	Grand Slam	Hard
Serena Williams #1	7-5 7-5	Na Li #5	Match data	Aug 17, 2013*	SF	Cincinnati Open	Premier 5 → modern equivalent WTA 1000	Hard
Serena Williams #1	6-3 7-6(5)	Na Li #5	Match data	Mar 23, 2013*	QF	Miami Open	Premier Mandatory → modern equivalent WTA 1000	Hard
Serena Williams #3	7-6(2) 6-3	Na Li #8	Match data	Oct 22, 2012	RR	WTA Finals	WTA Finals	Hard
Na Li #9	(w/o)	Serena Williams #6	Match data	May 19, 2012*	SF	Italian Open	Premier 5 → modern equivalent WTA 1000	Clay
Serena Williams #1	7-5 6-3	Na Li #12	Match data	Jul 1, 2010*	QF	Wimbledon	Grand Slam	Grass
Serena Williams #1	7-6(4) 7-6(1)	Na Li #17	Match data	Jan 29, 2010*	SF	Australian Open	Grand Slam	Hard
Serena Williams #2	6-3 7-6(6)	Na Li #18	Match data	Jul 30, 2009*	R32	Bank of the West Classic	Premier → modern equivalent WTA 500	Hard
Serena Williams #1	4-6 7-6(1) 6-2	Na Li #40	Match data	Apr 3, 2009*	QF	Miami Open	Premier Mandatory → modern equivalent WTA 1000	Hard
Na Li #30	0-6 6-1 6-4	Serena Williams #1	Match data	Oct 3, 2008*	R16	Porsche Tennis Grand Prix	Tier II → modern equivalent WTA 500	Hard
Serena Williams #15	6-3 6-7(1) 6-2	Na Li #52	Match data	Jan 18, 2006*	R128	Australian Open	Grand Slam	Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player	Current	Peak	Pts	Elo	W	L	Win %	GS	Olympics	1000 including documented historical predecessor categories	Finals	500 including documented historical predecessor categories	250 including documented historical predecessor categories	Titles
Serena Williams	#320	#1	13,615	2,399	837	172	83.0%	23	1	23	6	18	2	73
Na Li	#9	#2	7,585	2,117	338	159	68.0%	2	0	1	0	1	5	9

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age	Serena Williams							Na Li
Age	Yr	W-L	Win %	Rank	Elo	GS	Titles	Yr	W-L	Win %	Rank	Elo	GS	Titles
15	1997	3–2	60.0%	#101	1,582	0	0	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
16	1998	26–11	70.3%	#20	1,893	0	0	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
17	1999	38–7	84.4%	#4	2,189	1	5	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
18	2000	37–8	82.2%	#6	2,184	1	8	2000	1–3	25.0%	#136	1,496	0	0
19	2001	40–7	85.1%	#6	2,237	1	11	2001	0–1	0.0%	#302	1,480	0	0
20	2002	57–5	91.9%	#1	2,339	4	19	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
21	2003	36–3	92.3%	#3	2,365	6	23	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
22	2004	39–11	78.0%	#7	2,225	6	25	2004	6–1	85.7%	#78	1,599	0	1
23	2005	21–9	70.0%	#11	2,101	7	26	2005	23–14	62.2%	#56	1,710	0	1
24	2006	12–4	75.0%	#95	2,063	7	26	2006	36–22	62.1%	#21	1,818	0	1
25	2007	34–10	77.3%	#7	2,077	8	28	2007	22–12	64.7%	#29	1,819	0	1
26	2008	44–9	83.0%	#2	2,126	9	32	2008	28–14	66.7%	#23	1,863	0	2
27	2009	50–13	79.4%	#1	2,120	11	35	2009	35–17	67.3%	#15	1,938	0	2
28	2010	25–4	86.2%	#4	2,158	13	37	2010	36–20	64.3%	#11	1,849	0	3
29	2011	22–4	84.6%	#12	2,182	13	39	2011	33–17	66.0%	#5	1,862	1	5
30	2012	54–6	90.0%	#3	2,302	15	46	2012	43–17	71.7%	#7	1,999	1	6
31	2013	77–5	93.9%	#1	2,382	17	57	2013	46–14	76.7%	#3	2,067	1	7
32	2014	52–10	83.9%	#1	2,272	18	64	2014	29–7	80.6%	#9	2,024	2	9
33	2015	50–6	89.3%	#1	2,292	21	69	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
34	2016	38–6	86.4%	#2	2,208	22	71	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
35	2017	8–1	88.9%	#22	2,200	23	72	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
36	2018	18–7	72.0%	#16	2,112	23	72	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
37	2019	25–8	75.8%	#10	2,093	23	72	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
38	2020	16–5	76.2%	#11	2,045	23	73	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
39	2021	12–6	66.7%	#41	1,994	23	73	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
40	2022	3–4	42.9%	#320	1,926	23	73	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
44	2026	0–1	0.0%	#320	1,899	23	73	—	—	—	—	—	—	—

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age	Serena Williams																	Na Li
	Yr	Hard				Clay				Grass				Carpet				Yr	Hard				Clay				Grass				Carpet
	Yr	W	L	M	Win %	W	L	M	Win %	W	L	M	Win %	W	L	M	Win %	Yr	W	L	M	Win %	W	L	M	Win %	W	L	M	Win %	W	L	M	Win %
15	1997	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	3	2	5	60.0%	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
16	1998	16	7	23	69.6%	6	2	8	75.0%	4	2	6	66.7%	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
17	1999	27	4	31	87.1%	6	3	9	66.7%	—	—	—	—	5	0	5	100.0%	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
18	2000	29	5	34	85.3%	0	1	1	0.0%	5	1	6	83.3%	3	1	4	75.0%	2000	1	3	4	25.0%	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
19	2001	32	5	37	86.5%	4	1	5	80.0%	4	1	5	80.0%	—	—	—	—	2001	0	1	1	0.0%	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
20	2002	28	3	31	90.3%	18	2	20	90.0%	7	0	7	100.0%	4	0	4	100.0%	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
21	2003	13	0	13	100.0%	12	3	15	80.0%	7	0	7	100.0%	4	0	4	100.0%	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
22	2004	23	6	29	79.3%	10	4	14	71.4%	6	1	7	85.7%	—	—	—	—	2004	6	1	7	85.7%	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
23	2005	16	5	21	76.2%	2	2	4	50.0%	2	1	3	66.7%	1	1	2	50.0%	2005	16	12	28	57.1%	7	2	9	77.8%	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
24	2006	12	4	16	75.0%	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	2006	18	14	32	56.3%	12	4	16	75.0%	6	3	9	66.7%	0	1	1	0.0%
25	2007	24	6	30	80.0%	6	3	9	66.7%	4	1	5	80.0%	—	—	—	—	2007	13	5	18	72.2%	6	5	11	54.5%	2	1	3	66.7%	1	1	2	50.0%
26	2008	27	5	32	84.4%	11	3	14	78.6%	6	1	7	85.7%	—	—	—	—	2008	26	12	38	68.4%	—	—	—	—	2	2	4	50.0%	—	—	—	—
27	2009	36	8	44	81.8%	4	4	8	50.0%	7	0	7	100.0%	3	1	4	75.0%	2009	22	9	31	71.0%	5	4	9	55.6%	7	3	10	70.0%	1	1	2	50.0%
28	2010	10	1	11	90.9%	8	3	11	72.7%	7	0	7	100.0%	—	—	—	—	2010	17	14	31	54.8%	10	4	14	71.4%	9	2	11	81.8%	—	—	—	—
29	2011	18	2	20	90.0%	—	—	—	—	4	2	6	66.7%	—	—	—	—	2011	16	12	28	57.1%	15	3	18	83.3%	2	2	4	50.0%	—	—	—	—
30	2012	26	4	30	86.7%	15	2	17	88.2%	13	0	13	100.0%	—	—	—	—	2012	30	10	40	75.0%	12	4	16	75.0%	1	2	3	33.3%	0	1	1	0.0%
31	2013	46	4	50	92.0%	28	0	28	100.0%	3	1	4	75.0%	—	—	—	—	2013	35	8	43	81.4%	5	4	9	55.6%	6	2	8	75.0%	—	—	—	—
32	2014	41	6	47	87.2%	9	3	12	75.0%	2	1	3	66.7%	—	—	—	—	2014	22	3	25	88.0%	5	3	8	62.5%	2	1	3	66.7%	—	—	—	—
33	2015	30	3	33	90.9%	13	3	16	81.3%	7	0	7	100.0%	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
34	2016	20	5	25	80.0%	11	1	12	91.7%	7	0	7	100.0%	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
35	2017	8	1	9	88.9%	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
36	2018	9	5	14	64.3%	3	1	4	75.0%	6	1	7	85.7%	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
37	2019	16	5	21	76.2%	3	2	5	60.0%	6	1	7	85.7%	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
38	2020	15	4	19	78.9%	1	1	2	50.0%	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
39	2021	8	2	10	80.0%	4	3	7	57.1%	0	1	1	0.0%	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
40	2022	3	3	6	50.0%	—	—	—	—	0	1	1	0.0%	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
44	2026	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	0	1	1	0.0%	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
Career	—	533	103	636	83.8%	174	47	221	78.7%	107	17	124	86.3%	23	5	28	82.1%	—	222	104	326	68.1%	77	33	110	70.0%	37	18	55	67.3%	2	4	6	33.3%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 633/768 of Serena Williams's and 372/485 of Na Li's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age	Serena Williams											Na Li
Age	Yr	Sample	Aces/M	DFs/M	1st Sv%	1st Pts%	2nd Pts%	BP Saved%	BP Conv%	Svc Pts%	Ret Pts%	Yr	Sample	Aces/M	DFs/M	1st Sv%	1st Pts%	2nd Pts%	BP Saved%	BP Conv%	Svc Pts%	Ret Pts%
21	2003	13/39	3.9	2.1	61.7%	74.0%	52.8%	63.9%	58.8%	66.1%	51.8%	—	—/—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
22	2004	16/50	6.4	2.6	61.3%	73.3%	51.5%	64.8%	54.6%	64.9%	49.7%	—	—/—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
23	2005	14/30	5.9	2.6	61.2%	74.1%	52.5%	68.0%	48.3%	65.1%	47.5%	2005	2/37	1.5	3.5	71.4%	54.3%	62.6%	49.2%	41.7%	56.3%	43.6%
24	2006	15/16	6.3	2.9	59.3%	74.2%	47.4%	54.7%	58.2%	63.1%	46.9%	2006	36/58	1.9	2.3	71.1%	61.5%	49.3%	51.6%	50.5%	57.6%	45.2%
25	2007	42/44	6.1	2.6	59.4%	69.2%	48.1%	58.2%	57.3%	60.8%	46.0%	2007	33/34	1.5	2.0	71.5%	62.4%	51.9%	52.6%	45.7%	59.2%	46.2%
26	2008	44/53	6.8	2.7	61.4%	73.4%	45.2%	60.0%	47.6%	62.7%	47.7%	2008	32/42	2.2	3.9	66.3%	63.4%	48.3%	58.5%	51.1%	58.2%	46.8%
27	2009	57/63	6.2	2.8	60.8%	75.0%	50.7%	54.5%	48.2%	65.3%	46.2%	2009	47/52	2.1	2.9	63.9%	65.4%	51.1%	45.7%	50.4%	59.9%	46.1%
28	2010	29/29	8.6	2.9	62.3%	77.4%	47.5%	66.0%	51.5%	66.4%	46.8%	2010	48/56	2.3	2.9	68.5%	65.7%	49.2%	50.4%	51.7%	60.4%	47.3%
29	2011	25/26	8.0	2.5	59.0%	79.5%	53.0%	67.2%	50.8%	68.7%	46.9%	2011	39/50	2.1	3.2	69.1%	64.4%	47.3%	54.6%	51.5%	59.1%	45.2%
30	2012	48/60	8.2	2.3	59.0%	78.7%	54.8%	66.6%	53.2%	68.8%	49.8%	2012	49/60	2.3	3.0	68.7%	65.1%	53.5%	57.5%	51.0%	61.2%	47.8%
31	2013	74/82	6.1	2.2	63.0%	76.5%	53.5%	60.3%	56.0%	68.1%	52.4%	2013	52/60	2.8	4.2	63.2%	67.9%	49.4%	58.5%	57.2%	61.0%	49.3%
32	2014	56/62	7.7	3.5	59.3%	76.5%	51.6%	64.4%	52.8%	66.3%	48.9%	2014	34/36	1.9	4.0	66.5%	66.3%	49.7%	55.6%	57.2%	60.8%	50.0%
33	2015	50/56	9.5	3.5	59.9%	76.7%	55.9%	67.3%	54.5%	68.4%	47.8%	—	—/—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
34	2016	41/44	7.9	2.8	62.3%	77.4%	51.9%	58.8%	50.6%	68.0%	49.0%	—	—/—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
35	2017	9/9	7.9	3.9	55.9%	79.6%	46.7%	57.9%	51.3%	65.7%	46.5%	—	—/—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
36	2018	24/25	7.1	3.4	59.2%	74.2%	48.5%	55.3%	51.9%	63.9%	44.0%	—	—/—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
37	2019	31/33	6.6	2.8	59.2%	76.5%	50.4%	50.4%	45.6%	65.5%	46.7%	—	—/—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
38	2020	20/21	8.9	2.7	61.3%	73.3%	50.7%	71.0%	49.7%	64.3%	44.9%	—	—/—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
39	2021	17/18	5.1	2.6	57.4%	72.6%	48.9%	43.6%	49.4%	62.4%	46.2%	—	—/—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
40	2022	7/7	8.0	4.7	65.0%	68.0%	35.4%	62.0%	45.8%	56.6%	40.5%	—	—/—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
44	2026	1/1	7.0	7.0	79.0%	62.7%	45.0%	54.6%	27.3%	59.0%	38.2%	—	—/—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
Career	—	633/1,009	7.2	2.8	60.6%	75.5%	50.9%	60.9%	52.1%	65.8%	48.0%	—	372/497	2.2	3.2	67.4%	64.9%	50.1%	53.8%	51.9%	59.9%	47.2%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age	Serena Williams																Na Li
Age	Yr	Elo	P+	Serve+	Return+	PD	TPW%	Hard Elo	Clay Elo	Grass Elo	Set Win %	Set Margin	Dec. Set	Tiebreak	Pressure+	Schedule	Yr	Elo	P+	Serve+	Return+	PD	TPW%	Hard Elo	Clay Elo	Grass Elo	Set Win %	Set Margin	Dec. Set	Tiebreak	Pressure+	Schedule
15	1997	1582	144.0	—	—	—	—	+42	—	—	54.5%	+0.82	1–0	1–1	—	-0.18	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
16	1998	1893	158.1	—	—	—	—	-62	-201	-189	64.6%	+1.29	8–5 (62%)	2–3 (40%)	106.2	-1.19	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
17	1999	2189	178.2	—	—	—	—	+12	-418	—	80.2%	+2.10	8–5 (62%)	6–0 (100%)	108.5	-2.69	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
18	2000	2185	168.9	—	—	—	—	+24	—	-372	80.6%	+2.43	6–1 (86%)	4–3 (57%)	102.2	+0.57	2000	1497	107.1	—	—	—	—	+34	—	—	14.3%	-2.14	0–1	—	—	-0.21
19	2001	2238	172.8	—	—	—	—	+36	-434	-326	79.2%	+2.45	7–4 (64%)	5–5 (50%)	100.5	-2.79	2001	1481	95.3	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	0.0%	-4.00	—	—	—	+0.12
20	2002	2339	173.4	—	—	—	—	+18	-278	-232	87.1%	+2.70	9–3 (75%)	11–1 (92%)	111.5	-2.86	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
21	2003	2365	170.4	+7.11	+5.95	1.527	58.7%	+80	-218	-130	86.0%	+2.74	6–2 (75%)	2–0	—	-1.67	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
22	2004	2226	163.6	+6.68	+4.43	1.416	56.9%	+107	-101	+86	74.8%	+1.90	9–4 (69%)	4–3 (57%)	96.9	-0.38	2004	1600	125.7	—	—	—	—	+18	—	—	81.3%	+1.81	1–1	2–1 (67%)	—	+0.22
23	2005	2101	150.6	+5.70	+2.41	1.360	56.0%	+157	-3	+122	70.0%	+1.48	8–0 (100%)	1–6 (14%)	99.2	-0.26	2005	1711	139.1	-0.18	+0.14	0.999	49.8%	-25	-56	—	61.4%	+1.04	8–5 (62%)	4–4 (50%)	103.5	-0.97
24	2006	2064	147.1	+4.12	+2.38	1.272	54.9%	+120	—	—	69.4%	+1.75	3–1 (75%)	0–3 (0%)	96.2	-0.43	2006	1819	148.7	+1.65	+1.60	1.068	51.4%	-79	-12	-62	61.2%	+1.05	9–4 (69%)	7–4 (64%)	111.4	-2.52
25	2007	2077	165.4	+4.80	+3.80	1.173	53.4%	+88	+12	+155	78.3%	+1.84	6–4 (60%)	9–3 (75%)	101.7	-2.31	2007	1820	150.2	+2.75	+2.06	1.133	52.7%	+69	-38	-48	62.2%	+0.96	7–7 (50%)	3–1 (75%)	102.0	+0.95
26	2008	2126	164.9	+6.89	+4.29	1.280	55.0%	+42	-33	+130	80.0%	+2.11	9–4 (69%)	5–2 (71%)	102.9	-1.00	2008	1864	153.7	+2.74	+2.93	1.119	52.6%	+37	—	-127	60.4%	+0.83	12–5 (71%)	4–4 (50%)	103.2	-1.80
27	2009	2120	165.8	+9.20	+3.92	1.332	55.3%	+59	-117	+157	75.6%	+1.76	11–6 (65%)	8–8 (50%)	98.1	-2.33	2009	1938	153.8	+4.35	+2.54	1.150	52.7%	+49	-152	-127	64.9%	+1.04	10–6 (63%)	8–6 (57%)	103.4	-2.23
28	2010	2159	157.0	+8.78	+3.86	1.393	56.1%	+37	-163	+212	79.1%	+2.01	6–3 (67%)	10–2 (83%)	106.5	-1.14	2010	1850	150.5	+4.51	+3.61	1.195	53.7%	-23	-4	+91	64.3%	+1.23	9–9 (50%)	6–7 (46%)	96.6	+0.93
29	2011	2182	160.3	+9.93	+4.56	1.499	57.5%	+57	—	+125	78.9%	+2.33	6–1 (86%)	3–2 (60%)	101.2	-0.27	2011	1862	151.3	+3.52	+2.62	1.106	52.2%	-57	+131	+42	62.8%	+0.61	8–7 (53%)	9–6 (60%)	102.8	-0.26
30	2012	2302	168.5	+11.57	+6.33	1.597	58.7%	-26	-157	+62	88.2%	+2.98	6–1 (86%)	3–2 (60%)	103.3	-2.18	2012	2000	162.2	+5.42	+5.11	1.234	54.2%	-1	-5	-158	68.1%	+1.30	11–10 (52%)	6–4 (60%)	100.7	0.00
31	2013	2383	177.8	+12.05	+8.21	1.643	59.9%	-2	-40	+41	89.7%	+3.22	10–4 (71%)	3–3 (50%)	101.0	-0.69	2013	2067	165.5	+5.56	+6.05	1.265	55.0%	+56	-126	-177	72.1%	+1.64	8–5 (62%)	7–6 (54%)	99.0	-2.68
32	2014	2273	171.7	+9.98	+6.05	1.454	57.3%	+55	+1	+33	83.6%	+2.37	7–3 (70%)	8–0 (100%)	102.4	-0.53	2014	2024	155.9	+4.17	+5.37	1.275	55.5%	+114	-110	-151	75.0%	+1.82	6–4 (60%)	5–5 (50%)	96.9	+0.97
33	2015	2293	165.1	+9.57	+5.97	1.514	57.9%	+37	-12	+16	81.3%	+2.24	17–2 (89%)	7–2 (78%)	105.8	-0.61	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
34	2016	2208	161.7	+10.55	+5.23	1.529	57.9%	+31	+121	+136	83.0%	+2.39	4–2 (67%)	8–2 (80%)	100.3	-0.68	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
35	2017	2201	137.8	+4.47	+1.79	1.354	56.0%	+39	—	—	89.5%	+2.32	0–1	1–0	—	-0.09	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
36	2018	2112	148.0	+5.23	+2.07	1.220	53.7%	+22	+268	+229	71.2%	+1.29	3–1 (75%)	3–0 (100%)	102.0	-0.74	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
37	2019	2094	156.8	+7.34	+3.63	1.352	55.6%	+42	+282	+271	77.3%	+2.05	7–1 (88%)	—	—	-0.12	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
38	2020	2046	143.2	+4.70	+1.29	1.259	54.8%	+19	—	—	70.6%	+1.55	7–4 (64%)	4–3 (57%)	97.0	+0.57	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
39	2021	1994	145.6	+4.15	+2.90	1.229	53.9%	+132	+333	—	68.6%	+1.54	3–0 (100%)	2–2 (50%)	101.9	-0.19	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
40	2022	1926	119.5	+0.06	-0.90	0.934	48.7%	+144	—	—	47.1%	-0.35	1–2 (33%)	2–1 (67%)	—	+0.04	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
44	2026	1899	96.8	+0.09	-3.44	0.931	47.3%	—	—	—	33.3%	-1.67	0–1	1–0	—	+0.12	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
Career	—	2399	174.5	+8.45	+4.77	1.403	56.6%	+43	-85	+34	79.6%	+2.21	168–65 (72%)	113–57 (66%)	110.8	-2.44	—	2117	160.4	+4.01	+3.66	1.175	53.4%	+13	-21	-66	65.1%	+1.13	89–64 (58%)	61–48 (56%)	106.5	-1.53

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.

Serena Williams's most-played WTA rivals
Opponent	W	L	M	Last Played	H2H
Venus Williams	20	13	33	Aug 14, 2020	H2H
Victoria Azarenka	19	5	24	Sep 12, 2020	H2H
Maria Sharapova	20	3	23	Aug 28, 2019	H2H
Jennifer Capriati	10	7	17	Sep 9, 2004	H2H
Jelena Jankovic	10	4	14	Aug 16, 2014	H2H

Na Li's most-played WTA rivals
Opponent	W	L	M	Last Played	H2H
Maria Sharapova	5	10	15	May 10, 2014	H2H
Serena Williams	2	11	13	Mar 23, 2014	H2H
Agnieszka Radwanska	7	5	12	Aug 17, 2013	H2H
Victoria Azarenka	5	6	11	Oct 21, 2013	H2H
Jelena Jankovic	6	4	10	Oct 21, 2013	H2H