H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 08:25 UTC

Serena Williams vs Virginie Razzano H2H: 0-1

Virginie Razzano holds a 1–0 lead over Serena Williams in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Virginie Razzano leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Virginie Razzano won the 2012 Roland Garros first round 4-6 7-6(5) 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Serena Williams
USA Age 44 Right-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
0 – 1
1 main draw meetings
Virginie Razzano
FRA Age 43 Right-Handed 174 cm / 5'9"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
May 29, 2012* Roland Garros Grand Slam R128 Clay Virginie Razzano #111 4-6 7-6(5) 6-3 Serena Williams #5 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Serena Williams #320 #1 13,615 2,405 825 170 82.9% 23 23 5 17 3 71
Virginie Razzano #1,226 #16 2,420 1,876 200 216 48.1% 0 0 0 2 0 2

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Serena Williams Virginie Razzano
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 1997 3–2 60.0% #101 1,582 0 0 — — — — — — —
16 1998 26–11 70.3% #20 1,895 0 0 1999 0–1 0.0% #344 1,483 0 0
17 1999 37–7 84.1% #4 2,170 1 4 2000 3–4 42.9% #143 1,507 0 0
18 2000 37–8 82.2% #6 2,174 1 7 2001 10–12 45.5% #87 1,589 0 0
19 2001 40–7 85.1% #6 2,259 1 10 2002 11–12 47.8% #76 1,662 0 0
20 2002 57–5 91.9% #1 2,348 4 18 2003 15–20 42.9% #72 1,613 0 0
21 2003 36–3 92.3% #3 2,369 6 22 2004 7–8 46.7% #60 1,604 0 0
22 2004 39–11 78.0% #7 2,192 6 24 2005 16–22 42.1% #51 1,608 0 0
23 2005 21–9 70.0% #11 2,028 7 25 2006 10–18 35.7% #88 1,595 0 0
24 2006 12–4 75.0% #95 2,016 7 25 2007 34–20 63.0% #28 1,805 0 2
25 2007 34–10 77.3% #7 2,058 8 27 2008 14–20 41.2% #58 1,633 0 2
26 2008 41–8 83.7% #2 2,109 9 31 2009 31–20 60.8% #19 1,801 0 2
27 2009 50–13 79.4% #1 2,106 11 34 2010 9–15 37.5% #113 1,660 0 2
28 2010 25–4 86.2% #4 2,149 13 36 2011 13–13 50.0% #83 1,681 0 2
29 2011 22–4 84.6% #12 2,155 13 38 2012 5–9 35.7% #160 1,633 0 2
30 2012 48–6 88.9% #3 2,239 15 44 2013 9–8 52.9% #99 1,683 0 2
31 2013 77–5 93.9% #1 2,345 17 55 2014 4–8 33.3% #165 1,621 0 2
32 2014 52–10 83.9% #1 2,209 18 62 2015 4–2 66.7% #200 1,657 0 2
33 2015 50–6 89.3% #1 2,197 21 67 2016 5–4 55.6% #169 1,647 0 2
34 2016 36–5 87.8% #2 2,177 22 69 — — — — — — —
35 2017 8–1 88.9% #22 2,172 23 70 — — — — — — —
36 2018 18–7 72.0% #16 2,078 23 70 — — — — — — —
37 2019 25–8 75.8% #10 2,052 23 70 — — — — — — —
38 2020 16–5 76.2% #11 1,991 23 71 — — — — — — —
39 2021 12–6 66.7% #41 1,950 23 71 — — — — — — —
40 2022 3–4 42.9% #320 1,891 23 71 — — — — — — —
44 2026 0–1 0.0% #320 — 23 71 — — — — — — —