H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC

Serena Williams vs Virginie Razzano H2H: 0-1

Virginie Razzano holds a 1–0 lead over Serena Williams in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Virginie Razzano leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Virginie Razzano won the 2012 Roland Garros round of 128 4-6 7-6(5) 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Serena Williams
USA Age 44 Right-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
0 – 1
1 main-draw meetings
Virginie Razzano
France Age 43 Right-Handed 174 cm / 5'9"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Virginie Razzano #111 4-6 7-6(5) 6-3 Serena Williams #5 Match data May 29, 2012* R128 Roland Garros Grand Slam Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS Olympics 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Serena Williams #320 #1 13,615 2,399 837 172 83.0% 23 1 23 6 18 2 73
Virginie Razzano #1,226 #16 2,420 1,854 201 217 48.1% 0 0 0 0 0 2 2

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Serena Williams Virginie Razzano
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 1997 3–2 60.0% #101 1,582 0 0 — — — — — — —
16 1998 26–11 70.3% #20 1,893 0 0 1999 0–1 0.0% #344 1,483 0 0
17 1999 38–7 84.4% #4 2,189 1 5 2000 3–4 42.9% #143 1,481 0 0
18 2000 37–8 82.2% #6 2,184 1 8 2001 10–12 45.5% #87 1,578 0 0
19 2001 40–7 85.1% #6 2,237 1 11 2002 11–12 47.8% #76 1,657 0 0
20 2002 57–5 91.9% #1 2,339 4 19 2003 15–20 42.9% #72 1,612 0 0
21 2003 36–3 92.3% #3 2,365 6 23 2004 7–8 46.7% #60 1,593 0 0
22 2004 39–11 78.0% #7 2,225 6 25 2005 16–22 42.1% #51 1,606 0 0
23 2005 21–9 70.0% #11 2,101 7 26 2006 10–18 35.7% #88 1,593 0 0
24 2006 12–4 75.0% #95 2,063 7 26 2007 34–20 63.0% #28 1,806 0 2
25 2007 34–10 77.3% #7 2,077 8 28 2008 15–21 41.7% #58 1,634 0 2
26 2008 44–9 83.0% #2 2,126 9 32 2009 31–20 60.8% #19 1,788 0 2
27 2009 50–13 79.4% #1 2,120 11 35 2010 9–15 37.5% #113 1,655 0 2
28 2010 25–4 86.2% #4 2,158 13 37 2011 13–13 50.0% #83 1,680 0 2
29 2011 22–4 84.6% #12 2,182 13 39 2012 5–9 35.7% #160 1,632 0 2
30 2012 54–6 90.0% #3 2,302 15 46 2013 9–8 52.9% #99 1,682 0 2
31 2013 77–5 93.9% #1 2,382 17 57 2014 4–8 33.3% #165 1,620 0 2
32 2014 52–10 83.9% #1 2,272 18 64 2015 4–2 66.7% #200 1,656 0 2
33 2015 50–6 89.3% #1 2,292 21 69 2016 5–4 55.6% #169 1,646 0 2
34 2016 38–6 86.4% #2 2,208 22 71 — — — — — — —
35 2017 8–1 88.9% #22 2,200 23 72 — — — — — — —
36 2018 18–7 72.0% #16 2,112 23 72 — — — — — — —
37 2019 25–8 75.8% #10 2,093 23 72 — — — — — — —
38 2020 16–5 76.2% #11 2,045 23 73 — — — — — — —
39 2021 12–6 66.7% #41 1,994 23 73 — — — — — — —
40 2022 3–4 42.9% #320 1,926 23 73 — — — — — — —
44 2026 0–1 0.0% #320 1,899 23 73 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Serena Williams Virginie Razzano
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
15 1997 — — — — — — — — — — — — 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 1998 16 7 23 69.6% 6 2 8 75.0% 4 2 6 66.7% — — — — 1999 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
17 1999 27 4 31 87.1% 6 3 9 66.7% — — — — 5 0 5 100.0% 2000 0 1 1 0.0% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
18 2000 29 5 34 85.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 5 1 6 83.3% 3 1 4 75.0% 2001 5 8 13 38.5% 2 2 4 50.0% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — —
19 2001 32 5 37 86.5% 4 1 5 80.0% 4 1 5 80.0% — — — — 2002 6 7 13 46.2% 4 4 8 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
20 2002 28 3 31 90.3% 18 2 20 90.0% 7 0 7 100.0% 4 0 4 100.0% 2003 5 9 14 35.7% 6 7 13 46.2% 3 2 5 60.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
21 2003 13 0 13 100.0% 12 3 15 80.0% 7 0 7 100.0% 4 0 4 100.0% 2004 4 4 8 50.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — —
22 2004 23 6 29 79.3% 10 4 14 71.4% 6 1 7 85.7% — — — — 2005 4 10 14 28.6% 8 7 15 53.3% 3 3 6 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
23 2005 16 5 21 76.2% 2 2 4 50.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 1 1 2 50.0% 2006 8 9 17 47.1% 1 6 7 14.3% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
24 2006 12 4 16 75.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2007 28 11 39 71.8% 6 8 14 42.9% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
25 2007 24 6 30 80.0% 6 3 9 66.7% 4 1 5 80.0% — — — — 2008 8 13 21 38.1% 4 5 9 44.4% 1 2 3 33.3% 2 1 3 66.7%
26 2008 27 5 32 84.4% 11 3 14 78.6% 6 1 7 85.7% — — — — 2009 15 12 27 55.6% 9 5 14 64.3% 7 2 9 77.8% 0 1 1 0.0%
27 2009 36 8 44 81.8% 4 4 8 50.0% 7 0 7 100.0% 3 1 4 75.0% 2010 8 11 19 42.1% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
28 2010 10 1 11 90.9% 8 3 11 72.7% 7 0 7 100.0% — — — — 2011 10 8 18 55.6% 2 2 4 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0%
29 2011 18 2 20 90.0% — — — — 4 2 6 66.7% — — — — 2012 2 5 7 28.6% 2 2 4 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
30 2012 26 4 30 86.7% 15 2 17 88.2% 13 0 13 100.0% — — — — 2013 4 3 7 57.1% 5 3 8 62.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
31 2013 46 4 50 92.0% 28 0 28 100.0% 3 1 4 75.0% — — — — 2014 2 4 6 33.3% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
32 2014 41 6 47 87.2% 9 3 12 75.0% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — 2015 — — — — 4 2 6 66.7% — — — — — — — —
33 2015 30 3 33 90.9% 13 3 16 81.3% 7 0 7 100.0% — — — — 2016 0 1 1 0.0% 5 3 8 62.5% — — — — — — — —
34 2016 20 5 25 80.0% 11 1 12 91.7% 7 0 7 100.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2017 8 1 9 88.9% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 2018 9 5 14 64.3% 3 1 4 75.0% 6 1 7 85.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
37 2019 16 5 21 76.2% 3 2 5 60.0% 6 1 7 85.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
38 2020 15 4 19 78.9% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
39 2021 8 2 10 80.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
40 2022 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
44 2026 — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 533 103 636 83.8% 174 47 221 78.7% 107 17 124 86.3% 23 5 28 82.1% — 109 116 225 48.4% 64 67 131 48.9% 23 23 46 50.0% 5 11 16 31.2%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 633/768 of Serena Williams's and 249/365 of Virginie Razzano's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Serena Williams Virginie Razzano
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
20 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2003 5/35 0.8 3.8 63.9% 64.9% 39.5% 53.6% 53.7% 55.6% 50.3%
21 2003 13/39 3.9 2.1 61.7% 74.0% 52.8% 63.9% 58.8% 66.1% 51.8% 2004 5/15 1.0 6.2 60.8% 62.6% 43.1% 56.8% 61.8% 55.3% 40.7%
22 2004 16/50 6.4 2.6 61.3% 73.3% 51.5% 64.8% 54.6% 64.9% 49.7% 2005 12/38 1.3 5.5 64.0% 63.5% 42.1% 57.4% 44.1% 55.3% 44.0%
23 2005 14/30 5.9 2.6 61.2% 74.1% 52.5% 68.0% 48.3% 65.1% 47.5% 2006 20/28 1.0 4.6 66.9% 59.4% 45.1% 57.2% 45.7% 54.6% 40.7%
24 2006 15/16 6.3 2.9 59.3% 74.2% 47.4% 54.7% 58.2% 63.1% 46.9% 2007 30/54 1.8 4.6 64.7% 61.1% 43.5% 53.3% 50.7% 55.0% 45.1%
25 2007 42/44 6.1 2.6 59.4% 69.2% 48.1% 58.2% 57.3% 60.8% 46.0% 2008 30/36 1.9 4.5 64.0% 61.1% 43.0% 55.7% 50.1% 54.5% 44.0%
26 2008 44/53 6.8 2.7 61.4% 73.4% 45.2% 60.0% 47.6% 62.7% 47.7% 2009 47/51 1.8 3.5 64.6% 63.0% 48.1% 53.6% 45.8% 57.8% 43.8%
27 2009 57/63 6.2 2.8 60.8% 75.0% 50.7% 54.5% 48.2% 65.3% 46.2% 2010 23/24 2.1 4.1 64.6% 59.7% 41.3% 49.3% 54.3% 53.2% 42.9%
28 2010 29/29 8.6 2.9 62.3% 77.4% 47.5% 66.0% 51.5% 66.4% 46.8% 2011 25/26 1.8 4.2 65.7% 62.1% 42.1% 51.7% 50.1% 55.2% 43.5%
29 2011 25/26 8.0 2.5 59.0% 79.5% 53.0% 67.2% 50.8% 68.7% 46.9% 2012 13/14 1.5 3.5 62.9% 59.8% 41.7% 56.8% 54.0% 53.0% 41.7%
30 2012 48/60 8.2 2.3 59.0% 78.7% 54.8% 66.6% 53.2% 68.8% 49.8% 2013 13/17 1.9 4.6 66.1% 63.1% 48.1% 61.1% 46.5% 57.6% 42.1%
31 2013 74/82 6.1 2.2 63.0% 76.5% 53.5% 60.3% 56.0% 68.1% 52.4% 2014 11/12 2.1 2.9 71.3% 61.8% 41.6% 54.4% 55.4% 55.9% 43.7%
32 2014 56/62 7.7 3.5 59.3% 76.5% 51.6% 64.4% 52.8% 66.3% 48.9% 2015 6/6 1.0 4.7 73.6% 58.7% 52.3% 53.1% 55.2% 57.9% 45.5%
33 2015 50/56 9.5 3.5 59.9% 76.7% 55.9% 67.3% 54.5% 68.4% 47.8% 2016 9/9 2.4 4.7 64.7% 62.8% 37.8% 49.2% 55.4% 53.8% 45.0%
34 2016 41/44 7.9 2.8 62.3% 77.4% 51.9% 58.8% 50.6% 68.0% 49.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
35 2017 9/9 7.9 3.9 55.9% 79.6% 46.7% 57.9% 51.3% 65.7% 46.5% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
36 2018 24/25 7.1 3.4 59.2% 74.2% 48.5% 55.3% 51.9% 63.9% 44.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
37 2019 31/33 6.6 2.8 59.2% 76.5% 50.4% 50.4% 45.6% 65.5% 46.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
38 2020 20/21 8.9 2.7 61.3% 73.3% 50.7% 71.0% 49.7% 64.3% 44.9% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
39 2021 17/18 5.1 2.6 57.4% 72.6% 48.9% 43.6% 49.4% 62.4% 46.2% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
40 2022 7/7 8.0 4.7 65.0% 68.0% 35.4% 62.0% 45.8% 56.6% 40.5% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
44 2026 1/1 7.0 7.0 79.0% 62.7% 45.0% 54.6% 27.3% 59.0% 38.2% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 633/1,009 7.2 2.8 60.6% 75.5% 50.9% 60.9% 52.1% 65.8% 48.0% — 249/418 1.7 4.2 65.2% 61.6% 44.0% 54.2% 50.0% 55.4% 43.6%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Serena Williams Virginie Razzano
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
15 1997 1582 144.0 — — — — +42 — — 54.5% +0.82 1–0 1–1 — -0.18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 1998 1893 158.1 — — — — -62 -201 -189 64.6% +1.29 8–5 (62%) 2–3 (40%) 106.2 -1.19 1999 1484 97.7 — — — — — — — 0.0% -2.50 — — — +0.23
17 1999 2189 178.2 — — — — +12 -418 — 80.2% +2.10 8–5 (62%) 6–0 (100%) 108.5 -2.69 2000 1481 108.1 — — — — — +65 — 40.0% -0.53 1–2 (33%) 1–2 (33%) 98.1 +0.38
18 2000 2185 168.9 — — — — +24 — -372 80.6% +2.43 6–1 (86%) 4–3 (57%) 102.2 +0.57 2001 1579 126.2 — — — — -34 -3 +66 44.4% -0.41 6–4 (60%) 3–4 (43%) 103.6 -0.70
19 2001 2238 172.8 — — — — +36 -434 -326 79.2% +2.45 7–4 (64%) 5–5 (50%) 100.5 -2.79 2002 1658 129.3 — — — — -42 -61 — 48.1% -0.35 3–3 (50%) 6–3 (67%) 103.2 -2.19
20 2002 2339 173.4 — — — — +18 -278 -232 87.1% +2.70 9–3 (75%) 11–1 (92%) 111.5 -2.86 2003 1613 121.0 -0.21 +2.36 1.133 52.9% -31 +1 +72 45.6% -0.40 5–6 (45%) 5–2 (71%) 103.5 -0.11
21 2003 2365 170.4 +7.11 +5.95 1.527 58.7% +80 -218 -130 86.0% +2.74 6–2 (75%) 2–0 — -1.67 2004 1594 104.5 -0.89 -1.63 0.911 48.4% -36 -11 +105 46.9% -0.69 1–3 (25%) 3–0 (100%) 100.4 +0.44
22 2004 2226 163.6 +6.68 +4.43 1.416 56.9% +107 -101 +86 74.8% +1.90 9–4 (69%) 4–3 (57%) 96.9 -0.38 2005 1606 127.3 +0.37 +0.22 0.983 49.8% -74 +84 +60 41.2% -0.66 8–5 (62%) 3–8 (27%) 100.4 -0.08
23 2005 2101 150.6 +5.70 +2.41 1.360 56.0% +157 -3 +122 70.0% +1.48 8–0 (100%) 1–6 (14%) 99.2 -0.26 2006 1594 129.9 -0.29 -1.94 0.897 48.2% +18 +21 — 40.9% -0.50 3–7 (30%) 2–3 (40%) 95.8 -0.85
24 2006 2064 147.1 +4.12 +2.38 1.272 54.9% +120 — — 69.4% +1.75 3–1 (75%) 0–3 (0%) 96.2 -0.43 2007 1806 138.8 -0.54 +0.52 1.003 50.2% +49 -251 — 61.9% +0.91 9–4 (69%) 10–6 (63%) 109.3 +0.70
25 2007 2077 165.4 +4.80 +3.80 1.173 53.4% +88 +12 +155 78.3% +1.84 6–4 (60%) 9–3 (75%) 101.7 -2.31 2008 1635 123.8 -0.44 -0.24 0.968 49.5% +52 -83 -67 45.1% -0.35 5–7 (42%) 5–3 (63%) 96.6 +0.98
26 2008 2126 164.9 +6.89 +4.29 1.280 55.0% +42 -33 +130 80.0% +2.11 9–4 (69%) 5–2 (71%) 102.9 -1.00 2009 1789 138.2 +2.43 +0.57 1.037 51.0% -69 -109 -67 54.9% +0.62 8–4 (67%) 5–9 (36%) 100.1 -0.77
27 2009 2120 165.8 +9.20 +3.92 1.332 55.3% +59 -117 +157 75.6% +1.76 11–6 (65%) 8–8 (50%) 98.1 -2.33 2010 1655 119.8 -2.12 -0.81 0.917 48.1% -4 -39 — 41.5% -0.92 1–6 (14%) 1–1 — -0.13
28 2010 2159 157.0 +8.78 +3.86 1.393 56.1% +37 -163 +212 79.1% +2.01 6–3 (67%) 10–2 (83%) 106.5 -1.14 2011 1681 123.8 +0.20 +0.19 0.970 49.6% -1 -65 -3 51.9% +0.11 4–2 (67%) 6–3 (67%) 105.2 -0.70
29 2011 2182 160.3 +9.93 +4.56 1.499 57.5% +57 — +125 78.9% +2.33 6–1 (86%) 3–2 (60%) 101.2 -0.27 2012 1633 114.8 -1.74 -0.90 0.889 47.6% +11 +12 +24 39.3% -0.86 3–1 (75%) 1–1 — -0.93
30 2012 2302 168.5 +11.57 +6.33 1.597 58.7% -26 -157 +62 88.2% +2.98 6–1 (86%) 3–2 (60%) 103.3 -2.18 2013 1682 127.1 +0.95 -0.89 0.992 50.1% -10 -7 — 51.3% +0.31 3–2 (60%) 2–4 (33%) 99.5 -0.32
31 2013 2383 177.8 +12.05 +8.21 1.643 59.9% -2 -40 +41 89.7% +3.22 10–4 (71%) 3–3 (50%) 101.0 -0.69 2014 1621 106.8 -0.91 +0.76 0.992 49.8% +5 +39 -17 41.4% -0.52 1–4 (20%) 3–3 (50%) 96.7 -0.40
32 2014 2273 171.7 +9.98 +6.05 1.454 57.3% +55 +1 +33 83.6% +2.37 7–3 (70%) 8–0 (100%) 102.4 -0.53 2015 1656 110.4 +0.27 +1.25 1.081 51.4% — +28 — 75.0% +2.13 2–0 — — -0.16
33 2015 2293 165.1 +9.57 +5.97 1.514 57.9% +37 -12 +16 81.3% +2.24 17–2 (89%) 7–2 (78%) 105.8 -0.61 2016 1646 107.5 -0.91 +0.91 0.973 49.6% — +40 — 47.6% +0.19 3–2 (60%) 1–0 — -0.64
34 2016 2208 161.7 +10.55 +5.23 1.529 57.9% +31 +121 +136 83.0% +2.39 4–2 (67%) 8–2 (80%) 100.3 -0.68 2017 1581 95.0 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2017 2201 137.8 +4.47 +1.79 1.354 56.0% +39 — — 89.5% +2.32 0–1 1–0 — -0.09 2018 1572 98.9 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 2018 2112 148.0 +5.23 +2.07 1.220 53.7% +22 +268 +229 71.2% +1.29 3–1 (75%) 3–0 (100%) 102.0 -0.74 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
37 2019 2094 156.8 +7.34 +3.63 1.352 55.6% +42 +282 +271 77.3% +2.05 7–1 (88%) — — -0.12 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
38 2020 2046 143.2 +4.70 +1.29 1.259 54.8% +19 — — 70.6% +1.55 7–4 (64%) 4–3 (57%) 97.0 +0.57 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
39 2021 1994 145.6 +4.15 +2.90 1.229 53.9% +132 +333 — 68.6% +1.54 3–0 (100%) 2–2 (50%) 101.9 -0.19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
40 2022 1926 119.5 +0.06 -0.90 0.934 48.7% +144 — — 47.1% -0.35 1–2 (33%) 2–1 (67%) — +0.04 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
44 2026 1899 96.8 +0.10 -3.44 0.931 47.3% — — — 33.3% -1.67 0–1 1–0 — +0.12 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 2399 174.5 +8.45 +4.77 1.403 56.6% +43 -85 +34 79.6% +2.21 168–65 (72%) 113–57 (66%) 110.8 -2.44 — 1855 132.0 +0.03 -0.04 0.978 49.7% -7 -34 +14 48.1% -0.12 66–62 (52%) 57–52 (52%) 104.4 -1.27

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.